third degree violation (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

third degree violation in Ohio

20 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Dorseygreen
ohioctapp · 2021 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Id., citing State v. Dorsey, 2021-Ohio-76, ¶ 16 (2d Dist.). {¶10} With regard to the sentence imposed in the instant case, Stephens was convicted of Tampering with Evidence, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2921.12(A)(1).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Foster green
ohio · 2006
2 sentences

2006Due to the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2006-Ohio-856 , we reverse the sentence imposed by the court below and remand this matter for resentencing. {¶ 2} On September 1, 2005, White entered guilty pleas to four counts of Attempted Aggravated Arson, felonies of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2923.02 and R.C. 2909.02 (A)(2).

2006Due to the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2006-Ohio-856 , we reverse the sentence imposed by the court below and remand this matter for resentencing. {¶ 2} On January 9, 2006, Frisina entered guilty pleas to five counts of Robbery, a felony of the second degree in violation of R.C. 2911.02 (A)(2), five counts of Robbery, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2911.02 (A)(3), one count of Theft, a felony of the fifth degree in violation of R.C. 2913.02 (A)(1), and one count of Engaging in a Pattern of Corrupt Activity, a felony of the first degre

42006–2006
Blakely v. Washington green
scotus · 2004
2 sentences

2012Accordingly, appellant’s third assignment of error is without merit. {¶49} Appellant’s fourth assignment of error states: THE TRIAL COURT MADE FINDINGS OF FACT AT SENTENCING THAT WERE NOT IMPLICIT IN THE JURY’S VERDICT AND THEREBY VIOLATED APPELLANT BURNS’ SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. {¶50} Appellant contends here that the trial court engaged in unconstitutional judicial fact-finding in sentencing him, which is prohibited by Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

2008Per the *Page 3 notice, Mr. Hundzsa was admitted to the correctional facility and began serving his sentence on November 4, 2004. {¶ 7} Roughly two months later, on January 13, 2005, the trial court issued another nunc pro tunc order and judgment entry, which changed the terms of the sentences to run consecutively instead of concurrently. {¶ 8} On December 15, 2005, Mr. Hundzsa, pro se, filed a motion for postconviction relief, alleging sentencing errors in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 296 .

32005–2012
North Carolina v. Alford green
scotus · 1970
2 sentences

2023For the following reasons, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. {¶2} On May 31, 2022, Manyo entered a plea of guilty, by way of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.E.2d 162 (1970), to Abduction, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2905.02(A)(2) and (C), and Domestic Violence, a felony of the fourth degree in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A) and (D)(3).

2023For the following reasons, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. {¶2} On May 31, 2022, Manyo entered a plea of guilty, by way of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.E.2d 162 (1970), to Abduction, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2905.02(A)(2) and (C), and Domestic Violence, a felony of the fourth degree in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A) and (D)(3).

22006–2023
State v. Johnson green
ohioctapp · 2021
1 sentence

2025Id., citing State v. Dorsey, 2021-Ohio-76, ¶ 16 (2d Dist.). {¶10} With regard to the sentence imposed in the instant case, Stephens was convicted of Tampering with Evidence, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2921.12(A)(1).

12025–2025
State v. Lynn green
ohioctapp · 2023
1 sentence

2023That sentence was suspended, and the trial judge ordered Lynn to serve a sentence “up to six (6) months in the Guernsey County Jail.” Id.

12023–2023
State v. Fair green
ohioctapp · 2019
1 sentence

2021Portage No. 2018-P-0027, 2019-Ohio-2508 , this court affirmed the jury’s verdicts and the imposition of consecutive sentences but reversed for failing to merge allied offenses.

12021–2021
Anders v. California green
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

2017On December 1, 2016, appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) as well as a Motion to Withdraw. {¶5} This Court then provided Penrod the opportunity to file a pro se brief in support of his appeal, which he did on January 27, 2017.

2017On December 1, 2016, appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) as well as a Motion to Withdraw. {¶5} This Court then provided Penrod the opportunity to file a pro se brief in support of his appeal, which he did on January 27, 2017.

12017–2017
State v. Ware (Slip Opinion) green
ohio · 2014
2 sentences

2017In the Written Plea of Guilty, Boyer was advised that he was subject to a "MANDATORY PRISON TERM OF EITHER 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 YEARS." {¶ 3} Following a sentencing hearing on May 15, 2015, Boyer was sentenced to "a term of imprisonment of Two (2) years." {¶ 4} On June 21, 2016, Boyer filed a Motion for Judicial Release. {¶ 5} On September 26, 2016, a hearing was held on Boyer's Motion, at which the State opposed release on the grounds that Boyer's sentence was mandatory. {¶ 6} On September 28, 2016, the trial court granted the Motion for Judicial Release. {¶ 7} On October 6, 2016, the State of Oh

2017In the Written Plea of Guilty, Boyer was advised that he was subject to a "MANDATORY PRISON TERM OF EITHER 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 YEARS." {¶ 3} Following a sentencing hearing on May 15, 2015, Boyer was sentenced to "a term of imprisonment of Two (2) years." {¶ 4} On June 21, 2016, Boyer filed a Motion for Judicial Release. {¶ 5} On September 26, 2016, a hearing was held on Boyer's Motion, at which the State opposed release on the grounds that Boyer's sentence was mandatory. {¶ 6} On September 28, 2016, the trial court granted the Motion for Judicial Release. {¶ 7} On October 6, 2016, the State of Oh

12017–2017
State v. Eslich neutral
ohioctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2014S.W., Ste 104 Canton, OH 44703 Canton, OH 44702 [Cite as State v. Eslich, 2014-Ohio-4640 .] Gwin, P.J. {¶1} Appellant Amber Rae Eslich [“Eslich”] appeals her conviction and sentence for one count of Soliciting for Prostitution a misdemeanor of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2907.24 (A) following a jury trial in the Canton Municipal Court.

12014–2014
State v. Yambrisak neutral
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2013PAUL CUSHION, II. 38 South Park Street 75 Public Square, Ste. 1111 Mansfield, OH 44902 Cleveland, OH 44113 [Cite as State v. Yambrisak, 2013-Ohio-1406 .] Gwin, J., {¶1} Appellant Byron Yambrisak appeals his conviction in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas on one count of retaliation against a public servant or witness, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2921.05(A) and one count of intimidation of a public servant a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2921.03(A).

12013–2013
United States v. Booker green
scotus · 2004
1 sentence

2012Accordingly, appellant’s third assignment of error is without merit. {¶49} Appellant’s fourth assignment of error states: THE TRIAL COURT MADE FINDINGS OF FACT AT SENTENCING THAT WERE NOT IMPLICIT IN THE JURY’S VERDICT AND THEREBY VIOLATED APPELLANT BURNS’ SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. {¶50} Appellant contends here that the trial court engaged in unconstitutional judicial fact-finding in sentencing him, which is prohibited by Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

12012–2012
State v. Hartman neutral
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011Allen, Ltd. 27 North Fifth 713 South Front Zanesville, OH Columbus, OH 43206 [Cite as State v. Hartman, 2011-Ohio-6112 .] Gwin, P.J. {¶ 1} Defendant–appellant Trevor A. Hartman appeals from the imposition of a five year prison sentence upon his convictions in the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas on one count of gross sexual imposition of a child under the age of thirteen, a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4) and one count of attempted gross sexual imposition of a child under the age of thirteen, a felony of the fourth degree in violation of R.C. 2907.04(A)(4) a

12011–2011
State v. Harper green
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011PADDEN RONALD COUCH 139 West Eighth Street 121 West Eighth Street Cambridge, OH 43725 Cambridge, OH 43725 [Cite as State v. Harper, 2011-Ohio-4568 .] Gwin, P.J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant Henry Harper appeals the judgment of the Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of Kidnapping with a firearm specification, a felony of the first degree in violation of R.C. 2905.01(A)(1) and (2), Having Weapons While Under a Disability with a firearm specification a felony of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2923.13, and Discharge of a Firearm on or Near Prohibited Premises a misdemeanor of

12011–2011
State v. Elkins green
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011Rich St., Ste. 2100 Newark, OH 43055 Colummbus, OH 43215 [Cite as State v. Elkins, 2011-Ohio-3611 .] Gwin, P.J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant Timothy Elkins appeals his convictions and sentences from the Licking County Court of Common Pleas for one count of Rape of a minor less than ten years old, a felony of the first degree in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and two counts of Gross Sexual Imposition felonies of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4).

12011–2011
State v. Thomas neutral
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011Main Street, Ste. 101 250 East Broad Street, Ste. 1400 Lancaster, OH 43130 Columbus, OH 43215 [Cite as State v. Thomas, 2011-Ohio-3354 .] Gwin, P.J. {¶1} Defendant-Appellant William D, Thomas appeals from the sentenced imposed by the Fairfield County Court of Common Pleas upon his conviction after a jury trial of three counts of gross sexual imposition, felonies of the third degree in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4).

12011–2011

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.11 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2907.05 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.12 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.14 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2953.08 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 111 (1984–2025) NY 24 (1971–2026) OH 20 (2005–2025) HI 7 (1996–2026) PA 5 (1990–2015) IA 3 (1993–2018) NJ 2 (1997–2005) MN 2 (1992–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check