Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2026 13 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Com. v. Bradley, P.green2 sentences2026See Commonwealth v. Bradley, 237 A.3d 1131, 1138-39 (Pa. Super. 2020) (finding claim waived where appellant did not raise it in a post- sentence motion). 2025See Commonwealth v. Bradley, 237 A.3d 1131, 1138-39 (Pa. Super. 2020) (finding claim waived where appellant did not raise it in a post- sentence motion). | 5 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Hunzergreen2 sentences2026See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(b)-(c) (requiring citation to legal authority and reference to the record in appellate briefs); Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 516 (Pa.Super. 2005) (holding an appellant waives a claim where he failed to cite any legal authority in support of an argument in his appellate brief). 2025See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(b)-(c) (requiring citation to legal authority and specific reference to the record in appellate briefs); see Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 516 (Pa. Super. 2005) (an appellant waives a claim where he failed to cite any legal authority in support of an argument in his appellate brief); see also Commonwealth v. Sexton, 222 A.3d 405, 416 (Pa. Super. 2019) (appellant waived challenge to weight of the evidence where appellant's brief conflated weight and sufficiency claims and did not otherwise develop weight claim). | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Millergreen2 sentences2024See Commonwealth v. Miller, 212 A.3d 1114, 1131 (Pa. Super. 2019) (stating that an appellant waives a claim when he fails to properly develop that claim, including citation to relevant legal authority and a meaningful discussion of how that authority supports his claim). 2024See Commonwealth v. Miller, 212 A.3d 1114, 1131 (Pa. Super. 2019) (stating that an appellant waives a claim when he fails to properly develop that claim, including citation to relevant legal authority and a meaningful discussion of how that authority supports his claim). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Cartrettegreen2 sentences2016Commonwealth v. Cartrette, supra, 83 A.3d at 1042 (“Absent [a timely post-sentence motion or claim raised during sentencing], an objection to a discretionary aspect of a sentence is waived.”). 2016Commonwealth v. Cartrette, 83 A.3d 1030 (Pa.Super. 2013) (en banc). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Leatherbygreen1 sentence2026See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a); Commonwealth v. Leatherby, 116 A.3d 73, 83 (Pa. Super. 2015) (noting an appellant waives their claim when they “fail[] to expand upon [the] claim in the argument section of [their] brief.”). | 1 | 1 |
Com. v. Sexton, S.green1 sentence2025See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(b)-(c) (requiring citation to legal authority and specific reference to the record in appellate briefs); see Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 516 (Pa. Super. 2005) (an appellant waives a claim where he failed to cite any legal authority in support of an argument in his appellate brief); see also Commonwealth v. Sexton, 222 A.3d 405, 416 (Pa. Super. 2019) (appellant waived challenge to weight of the evidence where appellant's brief conflated weight and sufficiency claims and did not otherwise develop weight claim). | 1 | 1 |
Com. v. Lawrence, D.green1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Lawrence, 313 A.3d 265, 284 (Pa. Super. 2024) (finding claim waived where appellant did not raise it in a post-sentence motion). | 1 | 1 |
B.S.G. v. D.M.C.green1 sentence2022See ____________________________________________ 13 Even were Mother’s claim reviewable, given our determination that Pennsylvania does not have exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the custody determination, we would not find that the trial court erred in vacating its order requiring Child’s immediate return to Pennsylvania. - 14 - J-A15044-22 B.S.G., 255 A.3d at 535 (holding that an appellant waives a claim by failing to provide any discussion of the claim with citation to relevant legal authority); Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a).14 ____________________________________________ 14 Even if we were to | 1 | 1 |
Commc'ns Network Int'l, Ltd. v. Mullineauxgreen2 sentences2020See Communications Network Int’l, Ltd. v. Mullineaux, 187 A.3d 951, 965 (Pa.Super. 2018) (holding that an appellant waives claim of error where the appellant offers “no controlling authority” in support of argument). - 11 - J-A27012-19 We review a trial court’s evidentiary decisions under an abuse of discretion standard. 2020See Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a), Communications Network Int’l, Ltd. v. Mullineaux, 187 A.3d 951, 965 (Pa.Super. 2018) (holding that an appellant waives claim of error where they offer “no controlling authority”). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2020See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 925 (Pa. 2009) (explaining that an appellant waives a claim on appeal where she fails to provide any discussion of it with citation to relevant authority). -9- J-S25019-20 Judgment of Sentence affirmed.7 Judgment Entered. | 1 | 1 |
Hassel, R. v. Franzi, J.green1 sentence2020See Hassel v. Franzi, 207 A.3d 939, 950 (Pa.Super. 2019). “[W]here the evidentiary ruling turns on a question of law, our review is plenary.” Buckman v. Verazin, 54 A.3d 956, 960 (Pa.Super. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Buckman v. Verazingreen1 sentence2020See Hassel v. Franzi, 207 A.3d 939, 950 (Pa.Super. 2019). “[W]here the evidentiary ruling turns on a question of law, our review is plenary.” Buckman v. Verazin, 54 A.3d 956, 960 (Pa.Super. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Krebs v. United Refining Co. of Pennsylvaniagreen1 sentence2016See Krebs v. United Refining Company of Pennsylvania, 893 A.2d 776, 797 (Pa. Super. 2006) (stating that an appellant waives a claim by failing to raise it as an issue in both his concise statement and his statement of questions involved section of his brief on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Collins v. Coopergreen1 sentence2002See Pa.R.A.P. 2119; Collins v. Cooper, 746 A.2d 615, 619 (Pa.Super.2000) (stating that an appellant waives a claim of trial court error when he or she "has failed to cite any authority in support of a contention.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.