granted defense in Washington

2013App. 251 , 742 P.2d 190 (1987), a prosecution for second degree assault with a knife, the trial court granted a defense motion to exclude any evidence of the defendant's prior conviction for the same crime.

1993App. 251, 254 , 742 P.2d 190 (1987) (citing State v. Weber, 99 Wn.2d 158, 164-65 , 659 P.2d 1102 (1983)). *648 In the present case, the trial court granted the defense motion to exclude any reference to the fact that Condon had spent time in jail.

2003App. 601, 605-06 , 694 P.2d 692 (1985), the court held that there was no due process violation where the State orally informed the defendant of its intent to seek a manifest injustice, the probation counselor recommended a disposition outside the standard range, and the court granted defense counsel two continuances in order to give him additional time to prepare a response to the presentence report.

2003In State v. Beard, 39 Wash.App. 601, 606 , 694 P.2d 692 (1985), the court held that there was no due process violation where the State orally informed the defendant of its intent to seek a manifest injustice, the probation counselor recommended a disposition outside the standard range, and the court granted defense counsel two continuances in order to give him additional time to prepare a response to the presentence report.

2003In Falling, 50 Wn.

2003In Falling, 50 Wash.App. at 51-52 , 747 P.2d 1119 , Mr. Falling cited Gutierrez , and argued that the notice requirement of the Juvenile Justice Act for finding a manifest injustice should apply to the finding of an exceptional sentence under the adult Sentencing Reform Act of 1981(SRA).

2002Lewis, 130 Wn.2d at 702 .

2002Lewis, 130 Wash.2d at 702 , 927 P.2d 235 .

2001In Chambers-Castanes v. King County, 100 Wn.2d 275 , 669 P.2d 451 (1983), this Court, citing cases from other jurisdictions, determined that for a victim to sue a police department for the failure to rescue, there must be (1) some form of privity between the police department and the victim that sets the victim apart from the general public, and (2) explicit assurances of protection that give rise to reliance on the part of the victim.

2001In Chambers-Castanes v. King County, 100 Wn.2d 275 , 669 P.2d 451 (1983), this Court, citing cases from other jurisdictions, determined that for a victim to sue a police department for the failure to rescue, there must be (1) some form of privity between the police department and the victim that sets the victim apart from the general public, and (2) explicit assurances of protection that give rise to reliance on the part of the victim.

2022Id. at 913 .

2022At the hearing defense counsel declined to assist Harell . . . and defense counsel testified as a witness for the State.” 80 Wn.

2019“A court cannot consider inadmissible evidence when ruling on a motion for summary judgment.” Dunlap v. Wayne, 105 Wn.2d 529, 535 , 716 P.2d 842 (1986).

2019“A court cannot consider inadmissible evidence when ruling on a motion for summary judgment.” Dunlap v. Wayne, 105 Wn.2d 529, 535 , 716 P.2d 842 (1986).

2016Id. at 205 .

2015When the hearing reconvened, the trial court summarized its understanding of the issues before it: 2 Price' s instructional challenge was based on State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133 , 234 P. 3d 195 2010 ), which the Washington Supreme Court overruled in State v. Nunez, 174 Wn.2d 707 , 285 P. 3d 21 ( 2012).

2015When the hearing reconvened, the trial court summarized its understanding of the issues before it: 2 Price' s instructional challenge was based on State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133 , 234 P. 3d 195 2010 ), which the Washington Supreme Court overruled in State v. Nunez, 174 Wn.2d 707 , 285 P. 3d 21 ( 2012).

2015When the hearing reconvened, the trial court summarized its understanding of the issues before it: 2 Price' s instructional challenge was based on State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133 , 234 P. 3d 195 2010 ), which the Washington Supreme Court overruled in State v. Nunez, 174 Wn.2d 707 , 285 P. 3d 21 ( 2012).

2014Hopson. 113 Wn.2d at 276 .

2010The record, however, supports only that the comment referred to A.A.A. [5] Laws of 2005, chapter 68, referred to as "S.B. 5477" in the appellant's brief, was enacted to conform the SRA to the ruling in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

2010The record, however, supports only that the comment referred to A.A.A. [5] Laws of 2005, chapter 68, referred to as "S.B. 5477" in the appellant's brief, was enacted to conform the SRA to the ruling in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

2003Most recently, in State v. Ramos, 83 Wash. App. 622 , 922 P.2d 193 (1996), the trial court granted defense counsel's motion to withdraw on the eve of trial, which led to a continuance of the speedy trial date.

2003Most recently, in State v. Ramos, 83 Wash. App. 622 , 922 P.2d 193 (1996), the trial court granted defense counsel's motion to withdraw on the eve of trial, which led to a continuance of the speedy trial date.

2002Lewis, 130 Wash.2d at 702 , 927 P.2d 235 .

1993App. 251, 254 , 742 P.2d 190 (1987) (citing State v. Weber, 99 Wn.2d 158, 164-65 , 659 P.2d 1102 (1983)). *648 In the present case, the trial court granted the defense motion to exclude any reference to the fact that Condon had spent time in jail.

1993App. 251, 254 , 742 P.2d 190 (1987) (citing State v. Weber, 99 Wn.2d 158, 164-65 , 659 P.2d 1102 (1983)). *648 In the present case, the trial court granted the defense motion to exclude any reference to the fact that Condon had spent time in jail.

1972State v. Ruud, 6 Wn.