19 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of Joseph ANDREUCCETTI and Noemi Andreuccetti, Debtors-Appellantsgreen2 sentences2017In re Andreuccetti, 975 F.2d 413, 417 (7th Cir. 1992). 2017In re Andreuccetti, 975 F.2d 413, 417 (7th Cir. 1992). | 2 | 2 |
People v. O'BANNERgreen2 sentences2005See People v. O'Banner , 215 Ill. 2005See People v. O’Banner, 215 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Insurancegreen2 sentences2024Moore et al., 6 Moore’s Federal Practice 26.70[6][c] at 26-226 (3d ed. 1997)); see also Waste Management, 144 Ill. 2d at 199-200 (implied waiver of work product occurs “where the sought-after material is either the basis of the lawsuit or the defense thereof.”) ¶ 27 In this case, the trial court found that plaintiffs impliedly waived their attorney-client and work product privileges against disclosure of the protected materials where they relied on the materials to support their information and belief allegations. ¶ 28 “Pleading facts ‘on information and belief’ is a widely used device in both 2018Id. at 199-200 , 161 Ill.Dec. 774 , 579 N.E.2d 322 . | 1 | 5 |
Diamond v. General Telephone Co.green1 sentence2020Diamond v. General Telephone Co. of Illinois, 211 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rosier v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008Roiser, 367 Ill. 2008Roiser, 367 Ill. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Pyramid Controls, Inc. v. Siemens Industrial Automations, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Pyramid Controls, 176 F.R.D. at 273 . 2004Pyramid Controls, 176 F.R.D. at 273 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
green
2 sentences1998(See, e.g., Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (N.D.Cal. 1976), 413 F.Supp. 926 ; Truck Insurance Exchange v. St. 1991(See, e.g., Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (N.D.Cal.1976), 413 F.Supp. 926 ; Truck Insurance Exchange v. St. | 2 | 1991–1998 |
In re Marriage of Reicher
green
1 sentence2024“A plaintiff may sometimes be forced to present 7 No. 1-23-0901 allegations that are based on information and belief, particularly when the necessary facts are within the defendant’s sole knowledge.” In re Marriage of Reicher, 2021 IL App (2d) 200454, ¶ 42 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Nielson v. SwedishAmerican Hospital
green
2 sentences2017However, the manual also states that the risk- management department “reviews all QCRs and conducts investigation of occurrences or variances which require more complete documentation, follow-up from a risk management -6- 2017 IL App (2d) 160743 perspective, or reporting under the Safe Medical Devices Act.” Also, it provides that a “QCR may serve as a report to legal counsel to assist in the defense of a lawsuit or claim.” ¶ 21 E. 2017The forms also address billing, instructing that responsibility for medical costs is determined after the risk-management department or its designee investigates the occurrence. - 14 - 2017 IL App (2d) 160743 ¶ 44 The foregoing evidence reflects that the QCRs here (indeed all of defendant’s medical- occurrence QCRs) serve multiple purposes, including quality assurance (all medical-occurrence QCRs), risk management (all QCRs), and, to a certain extent, billing (all QCRs). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sowinski v. Ramey
green
1 sentence1996Failure by an assured to advise the carrier of the existence of a lawsuit will bar coverage on the basis of noncooperation, and I cite Sowinski v. Ramey, 36 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau
green
1 sentence1989Thereafter, a number of lower Federal courts held in antitrust actions that a single lawsuit or claim may constitute “sham litigation.” See, e.g., MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (7th Cir. 1983), 708 F.2d 1081 ; Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc. (9th Cir. 1982), 690 F.2d 1240 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
green
1 sentence1989Thereafter, a number of lower Federal courts held in antitrust actions that a single lawsuit or claim may constitute “sham litigation.” See, e.g., MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (7th Cir. 1983), 708 F.2d 1081 ; Clipper Express v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc. (9th Cir. 1982), 690 F.2d 1240 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.