8 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams Ex Rel. Wilford v. Barnes Hospitalgreen2 sentences2008He asked if any of "you folks ever had a lawsuit or claim brought against you?" Id. 2008He asked if any of “you folks ever had a lawsuit or claim brought against you?” Id. | 1 | 3 |
Guzzardo v. Vandeventer Spring Redevelopment Corp.green1 sentence2025See e.g., id. at 601–02 (dismissed nine years after original suit was filed); Duckett Creek, 930 S.W.2d at 500 (dismissed eight years after suit was filed); Shirrell v. Mo. Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446 , 449–50 (Mo. banc 1976) (dismissed four-and-a-half years after suit was filed); State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
King v. Ryalsgreen1 sentence2007For support for this proposition, they rely on King v. Ryals, 981 S.W.2d 151, 154 (Mo.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Girratono v. Kansas City Public Service Companygreen1 sentence1993“The appellate courts are more liberal in upholding a trial court’s action in sustaining a motion for new trial than in denying it.” Girratono v. Kansas City Public Service Co., 272 S.W.2d 278, 281 (Mo.1954). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co.
green
1 sentence2025See e.g., id. at 601–02 (dismissed nine years after original suit was filed); Duckett Creek, 930 S.W.2d at 500 (dismissed eight years after suit was filed); Shirrell v. Mo. Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446 , 449–50 (Mo. banc 1976) (dismissed four-and-a-half years after suit was filed); State ex rel. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Duckett Creek Sewer District v. Westerfield Development Corp.
green
1 sentence2025See e.g., id. at 601–02 (dismissed nine years after original suit was filed); Duckett Creek, 930 S.W.2d at 500 (dismissed eight years after suit was filed); Shirrell v. Mo. Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446 , 449–50 (Mo. banc 1976) (dismissed four-and-a-half years after suit was filed); State ex rel. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Hampton v. Carter Enterprises, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Hampton, 238 S.W.3d at 176 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
W. E. Bowen Improvement Co. v. Van Hafften
green
1 sentence2002In Bowen, the reviewing court discussed an earlier case in which a contractor and the city agreed to bring a lawsuit to test the validity of a city ordinance. 238 S.W. at 148 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.