party who urges exception in Louisiana

19 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Brown v. Drillers, Inc.green la · 1994 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2012 2 sentences 2012Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), 630 So.2d 741, 747, n. 7 ; Ortego v. State, Dep’t of Transp. & Dev., supra. On an exception of res judicata, the burden of proof is on the party who urges the exception to prove its essential elements by a preponderance of the evidence. 2010Brown v. Drillers, 630 So.2d at 747 ; Raymond, v. Video Inspection, 09-38 at 4, 16 So.3d at 441 .	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Bovie v. St. John the Baptist Parish, Dept. of Streets & Roads green lactapp · 2013 2 sentences 2020Id. 2019Id.	4	2014–2020
Davis v. Home Depot green lactapp · 1997 2 sentences 2008Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 , writ denied, 97-728 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 740 . 2002Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99), 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 .	4	1999–2008
Kelty v. Brumfield green la · 1994 2 sentences 2025Rogers, supra; Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La. 2/25/94), 633 So. 2d 1210 ; Hines, supra. The party who urges the exception of res judicata bears the burden of proving its essential elements by a preponderance of the evidence. 2022Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La. 2/25/94), 633 So. 2d 1210 , Hines, supra. The party who urges the exception of res judicata bears the burden of proving its essential elements by a preponderance of the evidence.	3	2009–2025
Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide green lactapp · 1999 2 sentences 2002Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 78, 80 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La. 2002Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99), 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 .	3	2001–2002
Ortiz v. Ortiz neutral lactapp · 2002 2 sentences 2012Ortiz v. Ortiz, 01-1252, p. 4 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/02), 821 So.2d 35, 37 . 2011Ortiz v. Ortiz, 01-1252 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/02) , 821 So.2d 35 .	2	2011–2012
Davis v. Home Depot green la · 1997 2 sentences 2008Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 , writ denied, 97-728 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 740 . 1999Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208 , writ denied, 97-0728 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 740 , Denkmann Associates v. IP Timberlands Operating Co., Ltd., 96-2209 (La.App. 1st Cir. 2/20/98), 710 So.2d 1091 ; Ebey v. Harvill, 26,373 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 12/7/94), 647 So.2d 461 .	2	1999–2008
Harris v. Caddo Parish School Bd. neutral lactapp · 2002 2 sentences 2005Harris v. Caddo Parish School Board, 36,591 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/11/02), 833 So.2d 1084 . 2003Harris v. Caddo Parish School Board, 36,591 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), 833 So.2d 1084 .	2	2003–2005
State v. Palmer neutral la · 1999 2 sentences 2002Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99), 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 . 2001Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99) 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/25/97) , 690 So.2d 208, 211 .	2	2001–2002
State v. Bargeman neutral la · 1999 2 sentences 2002Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/30/99), 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99), 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir.2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208, 211 . 2001Lennix v. Big 3 Industries of Air Liquide, 98-1275 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/30/99) , 735 So.2d 78, 80 , writ not considered, 99-1241 (La.5/28/99) 743 So.2d 658 , reconsideration denied, 99-1241 (La.9/3/99), 747 So.2d 530 ; Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/25/97) , 690 So.2d 208, 211 .	2	2001–2002
Raymond v. Video Inspection Services, Inc. neutral lactapp · 2009 1 sentence 2010Brown v. Drillers, 630 So.2d at 747 ; Raymond, v. Video Inspection, 09-38 at 4, 16 So.3d at 441 .	1	2010–2010
STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Matthews green lactapp · 1993 1 sentence 2009State, Dept. of Social Services v. Matthews, 615 So.2d 1112 (La.App. 5 Cir.1993) (citations omitted).	1	2009–2009
Ebey v. Harvill green lactapp · 1994 1 sentence 1999Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208 , writ denied, 97-0728 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 740 , Denkmann Associates v. IP Timberlands Operating Co., Ltd., 96-2209 (La.App. 1st Cir. 2/20/98), 710 So.2d 1091 ; Ebey v. Harvill, 26,373 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 12/7/94), 647 So.2d 461 .	1	1999–1999
Denkmann Associates v. IP Timberlands Operating Co. green lactapp · 1998 1 sentence 1999Davis v. Home Depot, 96-850 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/25/97), 690 So.2d 208 , writ denied, 97-0728 (La.5/1/97), 693 So.2d 740 , Denkmann Associates v. IP Timberlands Operating Co., Ltd., 96-2209 (La.App. 1st Cir. 2/20/98), 710 So.2d 1091 ; Ebey v. Harvill, 26,373 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 12/7/94), 647 So.2d 461 .	1	1999–1999
Sj v. Pm green lactapp · 1991 1 sentence 1993SJ v. PM, 586 So.2d 662 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1991); Lowe v. Prejean, 540 So.2d 436 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1989); Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas.	1	1993–1993
Lowe v. Prejean green lactapp · 1989 1 sentence 1993SJ v. PM, 586 So.2d 662 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1991); Lowe v. Prejean, 540 So.2d 436 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1989); Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas.	1	1993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4231 (17) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 13:4232 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 19 (1993–2025) MI 3 (1938–1942)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance