Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jenkins v. Jenkinsgreen2 sentences2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. 2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. | 11 | 13 |
Walker v. Walkergreen2 sentences2001Walker v. Walker, 295 S.C. 286, 288 , 368 S.E.2d 89, 90 (Ct.App.1988) (“This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under section 20-7-472 with sufficiency for us to conclude he was cognizant of the statutory factors.”). 2001Walker v. Walker, 295 S.C. 286, 288 , 368 S.E.2d 89, 90 (Ct.App.1988) (“This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under section 20-7-472 with sufficiency for us to conclude he was cognizant of the statutory factors.”). | 2 | 4 |
Doe v. Doegreen2 sentences2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors 2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors | 2 | 2 |
Bragg v. Bragggreen2 sentences2006Id. at 23, 553 S.E.2d at 255 . “This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under section 20-7-472 sufficiently for us to conclude he was cognizant of the statutory factors.” Jenkins v. Jenkins , 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001). 2005Id. at 23, 553 S.E.2d at 255 . “This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under section 20-7-472 sufficiently for us to conclude he was cognizant of the statutory factors.” Jenkins v. Jenkins , 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001). | 1 | 4 |
Crossland v. Crosslandgreen2 sentences2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. 2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. | 1 | 1 |
Arnal v. Arnalgreen2 sentences2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. 2017Code Ann. § 20-3-130 (C) (2014) (detailing the factors to consider in awarding alimony); Crossland, 408 S.C. at 452 , 759 S.E.2d at 423 ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); Arnal v. Arnal, 363 S.C. 268, 299 , 609 S.E.2d 821, 837 (Ct. App. 2005) ("This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . ." (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100 , 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))). 6. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors 2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors | 1 | 1 |
Ball v. Ballgreen2 sentences2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors 2001Johnson v. Johnson, 296 S.C. 289, 300-01 , 372 S.E.2d 107, 113 (Ct.App.1988); see also Ball v. Ball, 314 S.C. 445, 448 , 445 S.E.2d 449, 451 (1994) (the family court has wide discretion in determining the contributions made by each spouse to the marital estate; the weight to be accorded evidence of marital misconduct is for the court to determine in the exercise of its discretion); Doe v. Doe, 324 S.C. 492, 502 , 478 S.E.2d 854, 859 (Ct.App.1996) (the reviewing court will affirm the family court judge’s apportionment of marital property if it can be determined that the judge addressed factors | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
West v. West
green
2 sentences1988West v. West , *289 294 S.C. 190 , 363 S.E. (2d) 402 (Ct. App. 1987). 1988West v. West , *289 294 S.C. 190 , 363 S.E. (2d) 402 (Ct. App. 1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.