Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax
green
2 sentences2026“Such motions should be granted ‘sparingly and with care,’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” Id. (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 2024We grant such motions “ ‘sparingly and with care,’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax, 160 Wn.2d 141, 164 , 157 P.3d 831 (2007) (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 3 Caneer moved to file an amended appellate brief. | 13 | 2010–2026 |
San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax
green
2 sentences2026In principle, CR 12(b)(6) motions should be granted “ ‘sparingly and with care’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” San Juan County, 160 Wn.2d at 164 (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 2024We grant such motions “ ‘sparingly and with care,’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” San Juan County v. No New Gas Tax, 160 Wn.2d 141, 164 , 157 P.3d 831 (2007) (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 3 Caneer moved to file an amended appellate brief. | 12 | 2010–2026 |
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
green
2 sentences2026“Such motions should be granted ‘sparingly and with care,’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” Id. (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 2026In principle, CR 12(b)(6) motions should be granted “ ‘sparingly and with care’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” San Juan County, 160 Wn.2d at 164 (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). | 10 | 2007–2026 |
Tenore v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
green
2 sentences2026“Such motions should be granted ‘sparingly and with care,’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” Id. (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). 2026In principle, CR 12(b)(6) motions should be granted “ ‘sparingly and with care’ and only in the unusual case in which the plaintiff’s allegations show on the face of the complaint an insuperable bar to relief.” San Juan County, 160 Wn.2d at 164 (quoting Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998)). | 8 | 2007–2026 |
Hoffer v. State
green
2 sentences2007Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998) (quoting Hoffer v. State, 110 Wn.2d 415, 420 , 755 P.2d 781 (1988)). ¶45 NNGT alleged that the prosecutors violated its constitutional rights of free speech and free association by obtaining a preliminary injunction order that created substantial uncertainty as to the legality of its ability to solicit and receive media support during the final three weeks of the campaign. 2007Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 330 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998) (quoting Hoffer v. State, 110 Wn.2d 415, 420 , 755 P.2d 781 (1988)). ¶45 NNGT alleged that the prosecutors violated its constitutional rights of free speech and free association by obtaining a preliminary injunction order that created substantial uncertainty as to the legality of its ability to solicit and receive media support during the final three weeks of the campaign. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Matter of Marriage of Olson
green
1 sentence2020Prose litigants on appeal are held to the same standards as attorneys and are bound by the same rules of procedure and substantive law.3 In re Marriage of Olson, 69 Wn. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Alexander v. Sanford
green
1 sentence2016"The purpose of CR 12(b)(6) is to weed out complaints where, even if that which the plaintiff alleges is true, the law does not provide a remedy." Alexander v. Sanford, 181 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.