Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggsgreen2 sentences2022The decision to grant or withhold relief by way of second-tier certiorari largely depends on our “assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Heggs, 658 So. 2d at 531 n.14). 2022A “district court’s exercise of its discretionary certiorari jurisdiction should ‘depend on the court’s assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.’” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523 , 531 n.14 (Fla. 1995)). | 3 | 13 |
Dade County v. MARCA, SAgreen2 sentences2023CONCLUSION The decision to grant or withhold relief by way of second-tier certiorari largely depends on our “assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City 6 While the first-tier briefs alluded to traffic congestion, the record of the public hearing contains no such reference. “[T]he well[-]established rule applicable to . . . certiorari proceeding[s] [is] that the reviewing court’s consideration shall be confined strictly and solely to the record of proceedings by the agency or board on which the questioned order is bas 2022CONCLUSION The decision to grant or withhold relief by way of second-tier certiorari largely depends on our “assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City 6 While the first-tier briefs alluded to traffic congestion, the record of the public hearing contains no such reference. “[T]he well[-]established rule applicable to . . . certiorari proceeding[s] [is] that the reviewing court’s consideration shall be confined strictly and solely to the record of proceedings by the agency or board on which the questioned order is bas | 2 | 2 |
Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co.green2 sentences2006See Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d at 890-91 (upholding the district court's granting of certiorari review of a circuit court's decision based upon its conclusion that the legal error was sufficiently egregious or fundamental to fall within the scope of its certiorari jurisdiction); Ivey, 774 So.2d at 682 (explaining that district courts should examine the seriousness of the trial court's error and only grant certiorari when the violation of the clearly established principle of law results in a miscarriage of justice); Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 531 (Fla.1995)(explaining that the c 2006See Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d at 890-91 (upholding the district court’s granting of certiorari review of a circuit court’s decision based upon its conclusion that the legal error was sufficiently egregious or fundamental to fall within the scope of its certiorari jurisdiction); Ivey, 774 So.2d at 682 (explaining that district courts should examine the seriousness of the trial court’s error and only grant cer-tiorari when the violation of the clearly established principle of law results in a miscarriage of justice); Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 531 (Fla.1995)(explaining that the | 2 | 2 |
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanosgreen2 sentences2006See Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d at 890-91 (upholding the district court's granting of certiorari review of a circuit court's decision based upon its conclusion that the legal error was sufficiently egregious or fundamental to fall within the scope of its certiorari jurisdiction); Ivey, 774 So.2d at 682 (explaining that district courts should examine the seriousness of the trial court's error and only grant certiorari when the violation of the clearly established principle of law results in a miscarriage of justice); Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 531 (Fla.1995)(explaining that the c 2006See Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d at 890-91 (upholding the district court’s granting of certiorari review of a circuit court’s decision based upon its conclusion that the legal error was sufficiently egregious or fundamental to fall within the scope of its certiorari jurisdiction); Ivey, 774 So.2d at 682 (explaining that district courts should examine the seriousness of the trial court’s error and only grant cer-tiorari when the violation of the clearly established principle of law results in a miscarriage of justice); Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 531 (Fla.1995)(explaining that the | 2 | 2 |
Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.green2 sentences2023CONCLUSION The decision to grant or withhold relief by way of second-tier certiorari largely depends on our “assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City 6 While the first-tier briefs alluded to traffic congestion, the record of the public hearing contains no such reference. “[T]he well[-]established rule applicable to . . . certiorari proceeding[s] [is] that the reviewing court’s consideration shall be confined strictly and solely to the record of proceedings by the agency or board on which the questioned order is bas 2022The decision to grant or withhold relief by way of second-tier certiorari largely depends on our “assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Heggs, 658 So. 2d at 531 n.14). | 1 | 10 |
Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.green2 sentences2012See Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214, 215 (Fla.1998) (increased burden, added expense, and concomitant delay has no bearing on “adequacy” of plenary appeal). 1 Nor does the gravity of the error justify the relaxation of the irreparable harm prerequisite to certiorari relief. 2012Id. (even deprivation of constitutional right does not confer certiorari jurisdiction). | 1 | 1 |
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authoritygreen2 sentences2012The United States Supreme Court has succinctly summarized the salient relevant factors: In deciding whether to depart from a prior decision, one relevant consideration is whether the decision is “unsound in principle.” Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528, 546 [ 105 S.Ct. 1005 , 83 L.Ed.2d 1016 ] (1985). 2012The United States Supreme Court has succinctly summarized the salient relevant factors: In deciding whether to depart from a prior decision, one relevant consideration is whether the decision is “unsound in principle.” Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528, 546 [ 105 S.Ct. 1005 , 83 L.Ed.2d 1016 ] (1985). | 1 | 1 |
Pearlstein v. Malunneygreen1 sentence2004In Pearlstein , we concluded that our legislature, by enacting presuit notice and screening in medical malpractice cases, expressed a sense of urgency such that early intervention by means of certiorari was appropriate to correct errors thwarting the presuit requirements. 500 So.2d at 588 (drawing an analogy to News-Press Publishing Co. v. Gadd, 388 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), in which the legislative policy favoring expedition of proceedings involving media access to public records warranted early intervention by means of certiorari). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Department of Ins.green1 sentence1993Smith v. Department of Ins., 507 So.2d 1080, 1096 (Fla. 1987) (Ehrlich, J., concurring *1263 in part, dissenting in part) (emphasis supplied); see also, e.g., Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649, 665 , 64 S.Ct. 757, 765 , 88 L.Ed. 987 (1944) ("when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent"). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Allwrightgreen2 sentences1993Smith v. Department of Ins., 507 So.2d 1080, 1096 (Fla. 1987) (Ehrlich, J., concurring *1263 in part, dissenting in part) (emphasis supplied); see also, e.g., Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649, 665 , 64 S.Ct. 757, 765 , 88 L.Ed. 987 (1944) ("when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent"). 1993Smith v. Department of Ins., 507 So.2d 1080, 1096 (Fla. 1987) (Ehrlich, J., concurring *1263 in part, dissenting in part) (emphasis supplied); see also, e.g., Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649, 665 , 64 S.Ct. 757, 765 , 88 L.Ed. 987 (1944) ("when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Ft. Myers v. Splitt
green
2 sentences2023“This rule controls the determination of the factual basis establishing standing to initiate a certiorari proceeding in the circuit court.” City of Fort Myers v. Splitt, 988 So. 2d 28 , 32–33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). 14 Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523 , 530 n.14 (Fla. 1995)). 2022“This rule controls the determination of the factual basis establishing standing to initiate a certiorari proceeding in the circuit court.” City of Fort Myers v. Splitt, 988 So. 2d 28 , 32–33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). 13 Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523 , 531 n.14 (Fla. 1995)). | 2 | 2022–2023 |
Nader v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles
green
2 sentences2016The Court “has repeatedly emphasized that district courts must be allowed a large degree of discretion so that they may judge each case individually.” Id. (citation and quotation omitted.). “[T]he district court’s exercise of its discretionary certiorari jurisdiction should ‘depend on the court's assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief.’” Custer, 62 So. 3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d, 523 531 n.14 (Fla. 1995)). 2016The Court “has repeatedly emphasized that district courts must be allowed a large degree of discretion so that they may judge each case individually.” Id. (citation and quotation omitted.). “[T]he district court’s exercise of its discretionary certiorari jurisdiction should ‘depend on the court’s assessment of the gravity of the error and the adequacy of other relief’ ” Custer, 62 So.3d at 1092 (quoting Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d, 523 531 n. 14 (Fla.1995)). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
News-Press Publishing Co., Inc. v. Gadd
green
1 sentence2004In Pearlstein , we concluded that our legislature, by enacting presuit notice and screening in medical malpractice cases, expressed a sense of urgency such that early intervention by means of certiorari was appropriate to correct errors thwarting the presuit requirements. 500 So.2d at 588 (drawing an analogy to News-Press Publishing Co. v. Gadd, 388 So.2d 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), in which the legislative policy favoring expedition of proceedings involving media access to public records warranted early intervention by means of certiorari). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.