Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iseberg v. Grossgreen2 sentences2010In general, a settled rule of law that does not contravene a statute or constitutional principle should be followed unless doing so is likely to result in serious detriment to public interests, and such a rule may only be disregarded for "good cause" or "compelling reasons." Iseberg v. Gross, 227 Ill. 2d 78, 101 , 879 N.E.2d 278, 292 (2007). 2010In general, a settled rule of law that does not contravene a statute or constitutional principle should be followed unless doing so is likely to result in serious detriment to public interests, and such a rule may only be disregarded for "good cause" or "compelling reasons." Iseberg v. Gross, 227 Ill. 2d 78, 101 , 879 N.E.2d 278, 292 (2007). | 2 | 2 |
Appelhans v. McFallgreen2 sentences2008In addition, this court has noted that “[t]he rule of stare decisis is founded upon sound principles in the administration of justice.” Appelhans v. McFall, 325 Ill. 2008In addition, this court has noted that "[t]he rule of stare decisis is founded upon sound principles in the administration of justice." Appelhans v. McFall, 325 Ill.App.3d 232, 238 , 259 Ill.Dec. 124 , 757 N.E.2d 987 (2001). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Colon
green
2 sentences2016“In general, a settled rule of law that does not contravene a statute or constitutional principle should be followed unless doing so is likely to result in serious detriment prejudicial to public interests.” Id. ¶ 31 The State has failed to demonstrate good cause or compelling reasons to depart from stare decisis. 2015“In general, a settled rule of law that does not contravene a statute or constitutional principle should be followed unless doing so is likely to result in serious detriment prejudicial to public interests.” Id. ¶ 31 The State has failed to demonstrate good cause or compelling reasons to depart from stare decisis. | 12 | 2008–2020 |
Vitro v. Mihelcic
green
2 sentences2011Colon, 225 Ill.2d at 146 , 310 Ill.Dec. 396 , 866 N.E.2d 207 ; Vitro, 209 Ill.2d at 82 , 282 Ill.Dec. 335 , 806 N.E.2d 632 . 2011Colon, 225 Ill.2d at 146 , 310 Ill.Dec. 396 , 866 N.E.2d 207 ; Vitro, 209 Ill.2d at 82 , 282 Ill.Dec. 335 , 806 N.E.2d 632 . | 4 | 2006–2011 |
People v. Sharpe
green
2 sentences2007Suarez, 224 Ill. 2d at 50 , quoting Sharpe, 216 Ill. 2d at 520 . 2007Suarez, slip op. at 10, quoting Sharpe, 216 Ill. 2d at 520 . | 4 | 2006–2007 |
Mickens v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2008To support its argument that we should abandon the per se rule, in favor of an actual-conflict analysis only, the State argues that the per se rule is at odds with United States Supreme Court precedent, in particular Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 , 122 S.Ct. 1237 , 152 L.Ed.2d 291 (2002). 2008To support its argument that we should abandon the per se rule, in favor of an actual-conflict analysis only, the State argues that the per se rule is at odds with United States Supreme Court precedent, in particular Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 , 122 S.Ct. 1237 , 152 L.Ed.2d 291 (2002). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Suarez
green
1 sentence2007Suarez, 224 Ill. 2d at 50 , quoting Sharpe, 216 Ill. 2d at 520 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.