Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2024 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Castleberrygreen2 sentences2024See People v. Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 1 (abolishing the void-sentencing rule). 2023In that case, the supreme court abolished the void sentencing rule, which stated that “ ‘[a] sentence which does not conform to a statutory requirement is void.’ ” Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 1 (quoting People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 (1995)). | 4 | 15 |
People v. Pricegreen2 sentences2023See Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 19 (abolishing the void sentencing rule as constitutionally unsound); see also People v. Price, 2016 IL 118613, ¶ 27 , 76 N.E.3d 1240 (holding Castleberry applied prospectively and to all cases pending when the court’s decision was announced, including the defendant’s pending section 2-1401 petition for relief from judgment). ¶ 23 Generally, “[j]urisdiction over a cause depends on the state of facts at the time the action is brought.” In re Marriage of Allen, 265 Ill. 2023See Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 19 (abolishing the void sentencing rule as constitutionally unsound); see also People v. Price, 2016 IL 118613, ¶ 27 , 76 N.E.3d 1240 (holding Castleberry applied prospectively and to all cases pending when the court’s decision was announced, including the defendant’s pending section 2-1401 petition for relief from judgment). ¶ 23 Generally, “[j]urisdiction over a cause depends on the state of facts at the time the action is brought.” In re Marriage of Allen, 265 Ill. | 1 | 4 |
People v. Arnared2 sentences2023See People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 , 658 N.E.2d 445, 448 (1995), abrogated by Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916 (holding that because the trial court’s sentencing “order imposing concurrent [prison] terms was void, the appellate court had the authority to correct it at any time [citation], and the actions of the appellate court were not barred by [the Supreme Court Rules] which limit the State’s right to appeal and which prohibit the appellate court from increasing a defendant’s sentence on review”). ¶ 24 Moreover, we agree with respondent’s contention, raised below and on appeal, that petitio 2023In that case, the supreme court abolished the void sentencing rule, which stated that “ ‘[a] sentence which does not conform to a statutory requirement is void.’ ” Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 1 (quoting People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 (1995)). | 1 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Allengreen2 sentences2023See Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 19 (abolishing the void sentencing rule as constitutionally unsound); see also People v. Price, 2016 IL 118613, ¶ 27 , 76 N.E.3d 1240 (holding Castleberry applied prospectively and to all cases pending when the court’s decision was announced, including the defendant’s pending section 2-1401 petition for relief from judgment). ¶ 23 Generally, “[j]urisdiction over a cause depends on the state of facts at the time the action is brought.” In re Marriage of Allen, 265 Ill. 2023See Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 19 (abolishing the void sentencing rule as constitutionally unsound); see also People v. Price, 2016 IL 118613, ¶ 27 , 76 N.E.3d 1240 (holding Castleberry applied prospectively and to all cases pending when the court’s decision was announced, including the defendant’s pending section 2-1401 petition for relief from judgment). ¶ 23 Generally, “[j]urisdiction over a cause depends on the state of facts at the time the action is brought.” In re Marriage of Allen, 265 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Hurlbert v. Charlesgreen2 sentences2023“The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue that was already decided in a prior case.” Hurlbert v. Charles, 238 Ill. 2d 248, 255 , 938 N.E.2d 507, 512 (2010). 2023“The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue that was already decided in a prior case.” Hurlbert v. Charles, 238 Ill. 2d 248, 255 , 938 N.E.2d 507, 512 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Laugharngreen1 sentence2021People v. Laugharn, 233 Ill. 2d 318, 322 (2009). ¶ 14 In Castleberry, our supreme court abolished the void sentencing rule, which declared void any sentence that did not conform to statutory requirements. | 1 | 1 |
LVNV Funding, LLC v. Tricegreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., LVNV Funding, LLC v. Trice, 2015 IL 116129 ; Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 199 Ill. 2d 325 (2002); Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Arnared2 sentences2023See People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 , 658 N.E.2d 445, 448 (1995), abrogated by Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916 (holding that because the trial court’s sentencing “order imposing concurrent [prison] terms was void, the appellate court had the authority to correct it at any time [citation], and the actions of the appellate court were not barred by [the Supreme Court Rules] which limit the State’s right to appeal and which prohibit the appellate court from increasing a defendant’s sentence on review”). ¶ 24 Moreover, we agree with respondent’s contention, raised below and on appeal, that petitio 2023In that case, the supreme court abolished the void sentencing rule, which stated that “ ‘[a] sentence which does not conform to a statutory requirement is void.’ ” Castleberry, 2015 IL 116916, ¶ 1 (quoting People v. Arna, 168 Ill. 2d 107, 113 (1995)). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher
green
1 sentence2021See, e.g., LVNV Funding, LLC v. Trice, 2015 IL 116129 ; Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 199 Ill. 2d 325 (2002); Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
green
1 sentence2021See, e.g., LVNV Funding, LLC v. Trice, 2015 IL 116129 ; Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 199 Ill. 2d 325 (2002); Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d 514 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2019Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶¶ 31-33 . - 12 - 2019 IL App (2d) 170257 Castleberry eliminated the third type of void judgment, thus narrowing the universe of judgments subject to attack in perpetuity.” Id. ¶ 31. ¶ 22 This line of supreme court authority makes it abundantly clear that a trial court’s jurisdiction over a matter is not dependant on statutory authority. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Orahim
green
1 sentence2019Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶¶ 31-33 . - 12 - 2019 IL App (2d) 170257 Castleberry eliminated the third type of void judgment, thus narrowing the universe of judgments subject to attack in perpetuity.” Id. ¶ 31. ¶ 22 This line of supreme court authority makes it abundantly clear that a trial court’s jurisdiction over a matter is not dependant on statutory authority. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.