Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
120 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2026 71 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Beemangreen2 sentences2016Cumulative Error {¶ 151} In proposition of law No. 20, Belton urges the court to reverse his conviction or, alternatively, his sentence, on grounds of cumulative error. {¶ 152} The cumulative-error doctrine provides that “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , at ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987), par 2015Cumulative Error {¶ 95} In proposition of law No. 7, Johnson urges the court to reverse his sentence on grounds of cumulative error and order a new trial. {¶ 96} The cumulative-error doctrine provides that “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987), paragraph tw | 4 | 17 |
State v. Durantgreen2 sentences2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this 2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this | 3 | 3 |
State v. DeMarcogreen2 sentences2026“A conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 2012- Ohio-2577, ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 (1987), paragraph two of the syllabus. {¶ 26} Here, assuming the cumulative error doctrine is applicable to a non-trial situation, we have found no error, let alone cumulative error, that would have acted to deprive Smith of his constitutional rights. 2026Under the cumulative error doctrine, “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 , citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 (1987). | 2 | 46 |
State v. Hillgreen2 sentences2026But even if there are some errors, they do not “become prejudicial by sheer weight of numbers.” State v. Hill, 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 212 (1996), citing State v. Davis, 62 Ohio St.3d 326, 348 (1991). 33 {¶ 98} In support of his cumulative error argument, Petaway relies on the arguments made in his prior assignments of error regarding the purported improper admission of evidence. 2024But “errors ‘cannot become prejudicial by sheer weight of numbers.’ ” State v. McKelton, 148 Ohio St.3d 261, 2016-Ohio-5735, 70 N.E.2d 508, ¶ 322, quoting State v. Hill, 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 212, 661 N.E.2d 1068 (1996). {¶ 290} The ambiguous reference to a polygraph examination (see proposition of law No. III) did not deny Knuff a fair trial. | 2 | 5 |
City of Norwood v. Burtongreen2 sentences2020However, because Madison “offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance.” State v. Sapp, 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239, ¶ 103 ; see also Bethel, 110 Ohio St.3d 416 , 2006-Ohio-4853 , 854 N.E.2d 150, at ¶ 197 . 2018However, because Myers "offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance." State v. Sapp , 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239 , ¶ 103 ; see also State v. Bethel , 110 Ohio St.3d 416 , 2006-Ohio-4853 , 854 N.E.2d 150 , ¶ 197. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Bethelgreen2 sentences2020However, because Madison “offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance.” State v. Sapp, 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239, ¶ 103 ; see also Bethel, 110 Ohio St.3d 416 , 2006-Ohio-4853 , 854 N.E.2d 150, at ¶ 197 . 2018However, because Myers "offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance." State v. Sapp , 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239 , ¶ 103 ; see also State v. Bethel , 110 Ohio St.3d 416 , 2006-Ohio-4853 , 854 N.E.2d 150 , ¶ 197. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Allengreen2 sentences2026“However, the doctrine of cumulative error is inapplicable when the alleged errors are found to be harmless or nonexistent.” State v. Allen, 2016-Ohio-102, ¶ 53 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Brown, 2003-Ohio-5059 , ¶ 48. 2026“However, the doctrine of cumulative error is inapplicable when the alleged errors are found to be harmless or nonexistent.” State v. Allen, 2016-Ohio-102, ¶ 53 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Brown, 2003-Ohio-5059 , ¶ 48. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Akladyousgreen2 sentences2025"Under the doctrine of cumulative error[ ], a reviewing court 'will reverse a conviction when the cumulative effect of errors deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.'" State v. Akladyous, 2023-Ohio-3105, ¶ 60 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Kirkland, 2014- Ohio-1966, ¶ 140. 2024Cumulative Error {¶ 86} Creech argues the purported errors discussed within his third and fourth assignments of error amount to cumulative error. {¶ 87} "Under the doctrine of cumulative error[], a reviewing court 'will reverse a - 26 - Preble CA2023-05-005 conviction when the cumulative effect of errors deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.'" State v. Akladyous, 2023-Ohio-3105, ¶ 60 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Kirkland, 2014-Ohio-1966, ¶ 140 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Fromangreen2 sentences2025"The cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable when there are not multiple instances presented of harmless error." State v. Froman, 2022-Ohio-2726, ¶ 200 (12th Dist.), citing State v. Garner, 74 Ohio St.3d 49, 64 , 1995-Ohio-168 . {¶ 81} Here, we have found no prejudicial errors and only one harmless error— admission of Elliot's report into evidence. 2024"The cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable when there are not multiple instances presented of harmless error." State v. Froman, 2022-Ohio-2726, ¶ 200 (12th Dist.), citing State v. Garner, 74 Ohio St.3d 49, 64 , 1995-Ohio-168 (1995). {¶ 88} Here, we found, with respect to Creech's third assignment of error, that the trial court did not err when it denied Creech's request for a mistrial and that it properly instructed the jury regarding Chief Spurlock's statements about Creech's silence and request for counsel and regarding Creech's right not to testify. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mizegreen2 sentences2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this 2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this | 2 | 2 |
State v. Powellgreen2 sentences2026He contends that “if the errors complained of in the first three assignments of error, standing alone, do not call for reversal of his conviction, cumulatively, they deprived him of a fair trial.” (Appellant’s brief p. 14.) Under the cumulative-error doctrine, a conviction may be reversed when the cumulative effect of nonprejudicial errors “deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Garrett, 2022-Ohio-4218, ¶ 270 , citing State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . 2026Under the cumulative-error doctrine, a conviction may be reversed when the cumulative effect of nonprejudicial errors “deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Garrett, 2022-Ohio-4218, ¶ 270 , citing State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . | 1 | 86 |
State v. Madrigalgreen2 sentences2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this 2023We disagree. {¶ 110} Pursuant to the cumulative error doctrine “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even -49- though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191, 196-197 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987). “[I]n order * * * to consider whether ‘cumulative’ error is present, we would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in this | 1 | 5 |
Daniels v. Northcoast Anesthesia Providers, Inc.green2 sentences2024Cuyahoga No. 105125, 2018-Ohio-3562, ¶ 66 , quoting State v. McKelton, 148 Ohio St.3d 261 , 2016-Ohio-5735 , 70 N.E.3d 508, ¶ 321 . 2024Cuyahoga No. 105125, 2018-Ohio-3562, ¶ 66 , quoting State v. McKelton, 148 Ohio St.3d 261 , 2016-Ohio-5735 , 70 N.E.3d 508, ¶ 321 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Davisgreen1 sentence2026But even if there are some errors, they do not “become prejudicial by sheer weight of numbers.” State v. Hill, 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 212 (1996), citing State v. Davis, 62 Ohio St.3d 326, 348 (1991). 33 {¶ 98} In support of his cumulative error argument, Petaway relies on the arguments made in his prior assignments of error regarding the purported improper admission of evidence. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ward, 05ca13 (5-21-2007)green1 sentence2025Before a reviewing court can find cumulative error, “it must find a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different but for the combination of the separately Ross App. No. 24CA16 27 harmless errors.” State v. Ward, 2007-Ohio-2531, ¶ 49 (4th Dist.), citing State v. Thomas, 2001 WL 1103328 (2d Dist. | 1 | 1 |
In re J.M.green1 sentence2025“To find cumulative error, a court must first find multiple errors committed at trial and determine that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome below would have been different but for the combination of the harmless errors.” In re J.M., 2012-Ohio-1467, ¶ 36 (3d Dist.). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Craftgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Huntergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Fraziergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Matthewsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garner
green
2 sentences2016Cumulative Error {¶ 151} In proposition of law No. 20, Belton urges the court to reverse his conviction or, alternatively, his sentence, on grounds of cumulative error. {¶ 152} The cumulative-error doctrine provides that “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , at ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987), par 2015Cumulative Error {¶ 95} In proposition of law No. 7, Johnson urges the court to reverse his sentence on grounds of cumulative error and order a new trial. {¶ 96} The cumulative-error doctrine provides that “a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223, citing State v. DeMarco, 31 Ohio St.3d 191 , 509 N.E.2d 1256 (1987), paragraph tw | 10 | 2001–2022 |
State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2023Under the cumulative error doctrine, “‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’” State v. McKelton, 148 Ohio St.3d 261 , 2016-Ohio-5735 , 70 N.E.3d 508, ¶ 321 , quoting State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio2577, 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223. 2023Under the cumulative error doctrine, “‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’” State v. McKelton, 148 Ohio St.3d 261 , 2016-Ohio-5735 , 70 N.E.3d 508, ¶ 321 , quoting State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio2577, 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223. | 9 | 2017–2026 |
State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2024Cumulative Error {¶ 86} Creech argues the purported errors discussed within his third and fourth assignments of error amount to cumulative error. {¶ 87} "Under the doctrine of cumulative error[], a reviewing court 'will reverse a - 26 - Preble CA2023-05-005 conviction when the cumulative effect of errors deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.'" State v. Akladyous, 2023-Ohio-3105, ¶ 60 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Kirkland, 2014-Ohio-1966, ¶ 140 . 2023Standards of Review {¶ 60} Under the doctrine of cumulative errors, a reviewing court "will reverse a conviction when the cumulative effect of errors deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal." State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966, ¶ 140 . {¶ 61} To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Akladyos must show his defense counsel's performance was deficient, and that he was prejudiced as a result. | 7 | 2020–2026 |
State v. Froman (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2025This Court disagrees. {¶58} “Under the doctrine of cumulative error, ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’” State v. Froman, 2020-Ohio-4523, ¶ 156 , quoting State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . 2024“Under the doctrine of cumulative error, ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’” State v. Froman, 162 Ohio St.3d 435 , 2020-Ohio-4523, ¶ 156 , quoting State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . | 7 | 2020–2025 |
State v. Garrett
green
2 sentences2026He contends that “if the errors complained of in the first three assignments of error, standing alone, do not call for reversal of his conviction, cumulatively, they deprived him of a fair trial.” (Appellant’s brief p. 14.) Under the cumulative-error doctrine, a conviction may be reversed when the cumulative effect of nonprejudicial errors “deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Garrett, 2022-Ohio-4218, ¶ 270 , citing State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . 2026Under the cumulative-error doctrine, a conviction may be reversed when the cumulative effect of nonprejudicial errors “deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Garrett, 2022-Ohio-4218, ¶ 270 , citing State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . | 5 | 2023–2026 |
State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2025Legal Standard {¶124} “The cumulative-error doctrine provides that ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’” State v. Belton, 2016-Ohio-1581, ¶ 169 , quoting State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . 2023The cumulative-error doctrine provides that ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’ State v. Belton, 149 Ohio St.3d 165 , 2016-Ohio-1581 , 74 N.E.3d 319, ¶ 169 , quoting State v. Powell, 132 Ohio St.3d 233 , 2012-Ohio-2577 , 971 N.E.2d 865 , ¶ 223. | 5 | 2019–2025 |
State v. Sapp
green
2 sentences2022However, “[a]s [Drain] offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance.” State v. Sapp, 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239, ¶ 103 . 2022However, “[a]s [Drain] offers no further analysis, this proposition lacks substance.” State v. Sapp, 105 Ohio St.3d 104 , 2004-Ohio-7008 , 822 N.E.2d 1239, ¶ 103 . | 3 | 2018–2022 |
State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2021We disagree. {¶ 84} "Under the doctrine of accumulated error, a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal." State v. Pickens, 141 Ohio St.3d 462 , 2014-Ohio-5445, ¶ 230 , citation omitted, overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Bates, 159 Ohio St.3d 156 , 2020-Ohio-634 . 2021We disagree. {¶ 84} "Under the doctrine of accumulated error, a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal." State v. Pickens, 141 Ohio St.3d 462 , 2014-Ohio-5445, ¶ 230 , citation omitted, overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Bates, 159 Ohio St.3d 156 , 2020-Ohio-634 . | 3 | 2016–2021 |
State v. Garner
green
2 sentences2025"The cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable when there are not multiple instances presented of harmless error." State v. Froman, 2022-Ohio-2726, ¶ 200 (12th Dist.), citing State v. Garner, 74 Ohio St.3d 49, 64 , 1995-Ohio-168 . {¶ 81} Here, we have found no prejudicial errors and only one harmless error— admission of Elliot's report into evidence. 2024"The cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable when there are not multiple instances presented of harmless error." State v. Froman, 2022-Ohio-2726, ¶ 200 (12th Dist.), citing State v. Garner, 74 Ohio St.3d 49, 64 , 1995-Ohio-168 (1995). {¶ 88} Here, we found, with respect to Creech's third assignment of error, that the trial court did not err when it denied Creech's request for a mistrial and that it properly instructed the jury regarding Chief Spurlock's statements about Creech's silence and request for counsel and regarding Creech's right not to testify. | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2024“A claim of cumulative error based on the ineffective assistance of counsel would require a determination that while no single act by trial counsel met the standard set forth in Strickland, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , the cumulative effect of counsel’s conduct satisfied the Strickland standard.” State v. Howard, 2d Dist. 2024“A claim of cumulative error based on the ineffective assistance of counsel would require a determination that while no single act by trial counsel met the standard set forth in Strickland, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , the cumulative effect of counsel’s conduct satisfied the Strickland standard.” State v. Howard, 2d Dist. | 2 | 2013–2024 |
State v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2023Warren No. CA2018-03-022, 2019-Ohio-338, ¶ 25 . {¶ 54} However, as relevant here, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that "in order to consider whether ‘cumulative' error is present, [the court] would first have to find that multiple errors were committed in [the] case." State v. Madrigal, 87 Ohio St.3d 378, 398 (2000); State v. Kaufold, 12th Dist. 2021Warren No. CA2018-03-022, 2019-Ohio-338, ¶ 25 , quoting State v. Kirkland, 140 Ohio St.3d 73 , 2014-Ohio-1966, ¶ 140 . | 2 | 2021–2023 |
State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2021We disagree. {¶ 84} "Under the doctrine of accumulated error, a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal." State v. Pickens, 141 Ohio St.3d 462 , 2014-Ohio-5445, ¶ 230 , citation omitted, overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Bates, 159 Ohio St.3d 156 , 2020-Ohio-634 . 2021We disagree. {¶ 84} "Under the doctrine of accumulated error, a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal." State v. Pickens, 141 Ohio St.3d 462 , 2014-Ohio-5445, ¶ 230 , citation omitted, overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Bates, 159 Ohio St.3d 156 , 2020-Ohio-634 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Wesson
green
1 sentence2025“The cumulative error doctrine provides that ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.” State v. Wesson, 2013-Ohio-4575, ¶ 87 , quoting State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . {¶66} Given that we did not find multiple errors, we will not apply the cumulative-error doctrine. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Knuff
green
1 sentence2025Law and analysis {¶67} “Under the cumulative-error doctrine, ‘a conviction will be reversed when the cumulative effect of errors in a trial deprives a defendant of a fair trial even though each of the numerous instances of trial-court error does not individually constitute cause for reversal.’ ” State v. Knuff, 2024-Ohio-902, ¶ 288 , quoting State v. Powell, 2012-Ohio-2577, ¶ 223 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
| State v. Blanton green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| State v. K.A.C. green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| State v. Tench (Slip Opinion) green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. Tench green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. Myers (Slip Opinion) green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion) green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| State v. Clinton green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| State v. Barnes green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State v. Lott green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| State v. Jones green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| State v. Maxwell green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| State v. Stober green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.