Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisillgreen2 sentences1989Article 927. 3 As long ago explained by Judge Tate, "The essential function of this exception is to provide a threshold device for terminating a suit brought by one without legal interest to assert it.” Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill, 201 So.2d 136, 142 (3rd Cir.1967) (citations omitted). 1979In Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill, 201 So.2d 136 (La.App.3d Cir. 1967), the court stated: "The essential function of this exception is to provide a threshold device for terminating a suit brought by one without legal interest to assert it. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Waterhouse v. Star Land Co.
neutral
2 sentences1979Reporter's Comment (b) 5, LSA-CCP art. 927; Waterhouse v. Star Land Co., 139 La. 177 , 71 So. 358 ; McMahon, Parties Litigant in Louisiana, 11 Tul.L.Rev. 527, 528-32 (1937); McMahon, The Exception of No Cause of Action in Louisiana, 9 Tul.L. 1979Reporter's Comment (b) 5, LSA-CCP art. 927; Waterhouse v. Star Land Co., 139 La. 177 , 71 So. 358 ; McMahon, Parties Litigant in Louisiana, 11 Tul.L.Rev. 527, 528-32 (1937); McMahon, The Exception of No Cause of Action in Louisiana, 9 Tul.L. | 5 | 1967–1979 |
Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. v. Verdin
green
2 sentences2003Id.; Alco Collections Inc. v. Poirier, 95-2582 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96) , 680 So.2d 735 , writ denied, 96-2628 (La.12/13/96), 692 So.2d 1067 . 2001Id.; Alco Collections Inc. v. Poirier, 95-2582 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96) , 680 So.2d 735 , writ denied 96-2628 (La.12/13/96), 692 So.2d 1067 . | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Alco Collections, Inc. v. Poirier
neutral
2 sentences2003Id.; Alco Collections Inc. v. Poirier, 95-2582 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96) , 680 So.2d 735 , writ denied, 96-2628 (La.12/13/96), 692 So.2d 1067 . 2003Id.; Alco Collections Inc. v. Poirier, 95-2582 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96) , 680 So.2d 735 , writ denied, 96-2628 (La.12/13/96), 692 So.2d 1067 . | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Louisiana Capital Assistance Center v. Dinvaut
neutral
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat. Bank
green
1 sentence2004Robertson v. Caddo Parish, Louisiana, 36,540 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), 833 So.2d 1139 ; Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 37,266 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/03), 852 So.2d 1221 . [4] The essential function of an exception of no right of action is to test whether the plaintiff has a real and actual interest in the action. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Robertson v. CADDO PARISH, LA.
neutral
1 sentence2004Robertson v. Caddo Parish, Louisiana, 36,540 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), 833 So.2d 1139 ; Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 37,266 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/03), 852 So.2d 1221 . [4] The essential function of an exception of no right of action is to test whether the plaintiff has a real and actual interest in the action. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Td v. Mmm
red
1 sentence2000T.D. v. M.M.M., 98-167 (La.3/2/99) 730 So.2d 873 . [3] Even with regard to legitimate children, a biological father has been found to have such avowal action. [4] The essential function of the exception of no right of action is to provide a threshold device for terminating a suit brought by one with no legal interest to assert it, that is, to challenge the plaintiff's interest in the subject matter of the suit or his lack of capacity to proceed with the suit. [5] This exception is not available to urge a defense to the effect that the plaintiff is without interest simply because the defendants | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Henry v. State, Through Dept. of Health
green
1 sentence1990Henry v. State, through DHHR, 435 So.2d 565 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983), writ denied 441 So.2d 750 (La.1983). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Henry v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES
neutral
1 sentence1990Henry v. State, through DHHR, 435 So.2d 565 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983), writ denied 441 So.2d 750 (La.1983). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System
green
1 sentence1989Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System, 456 So.2d 594 (La.1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Watkins v. Louisiana High School Athletic Ass'n
green
1 sentence1984Watkins v. Louisiana High *189 School Athletic Ass'n, 301 So.2d 695 (La. | 1 | 1984–1984 |