highest standard (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

highest standard in Louisiana

17 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Green v. Taca International Airlinesgreen
la · 1974 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–2025
2 sentences

2025Airlines, 304 So. 2d 357, 359-60 (La. 1974).

1996The Supreme *385 Court in Green, 304 So.2d at 359 , described the applicable standard: The duty owed by a common carrier in Louisiana to its passengers is stringent, whether it be termed "the highest standard of care," [footnote omitted] "highest degree of vigilance, care and precaution for the safety of those it undertakes to transport," or "the strictest diligence." The Banks case cited by Hyatt involves innkeeper liability for third party criminal acts, but the Banks court did not limit the high standard of care to third party criminal acts.

23

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
McLain v. Zurich Insurance green
la · 1969
2 sentences

2009Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied 254 La. 15 , 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

1999Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 254 So.2d La. 15, 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

61990–2009
Calais v. Thibodeaux green
lactapp · 1969
2 sentences

2009Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied 254 La. 15 , 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

1999Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 254 So.2d La. 15, 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

61990–2009
State in Interest of Delcuze green
la · 1981
2 sentences

1990Consequently, these proceedings which would irreversibly terminate a parent's rights must comport with the highest standard of due process, Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, [ 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981)] supra; State in re: Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

1985Consequently, these proceedings which would irreversibly terminate a parent’s rights must comport with the highest standard of due process, Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, supra; State in re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

51984–1990
Calais v. Thibodeaux green
la · 1969
2 sentences

2009Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied 254 La. 15 , 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

1997Calais v. Thibodeaux, 220 So.2d 209 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 254 La. 15 , 222 So.2d 67 (1969).

41990–2009
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty. green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

1990Consequently, these proceedings which would irreversibly terminate a parent's rights must comport with the highest standard of due process, Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, [ 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981)] supra; State in re: Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

1990Consequently, these proceedings which would irreversibly terminate a parent's rights must comport with the highest standard of due process, Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, [ 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981)] supra; State in re: Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

31984–1990
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co. green
la · 1922
2 sentences

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

22000–2012
King v. King green
la · 1968
2 sentences

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

22000–2012
Wise v. Prescott green
la · 1963
2 sentences

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

2012King v. King, 253 La. 270 , 217 So.2d 395 (1968); Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157 , 151 So.2d 356 (1963); Hopkins v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 150 La. 61 , 90 So. 512 (1921).

22000–2012
Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. green
la · 1982
1 sentence

2025Historically, Louisiana jurisprudence analogized an innkeeper’s duty to that of a common carrier owing “the highest standard of care,” or “highest degree of vigilance, care and precaution for the safety of those it undertook to transport,” or “the strictest diligence.” See Kraaz, 410 So. 2d at 1053 ; Green v. TACA Intern.

12025–2025
Philip Aaron Banks, Cross-Appellants v. Hyatt Corporation, Cross-Appellee, Refco Poydras Hotel Joint Venture green
ca5 · 1984
1 sentence

1996In Banks, 722 F.2d at 221 , the court stated that: "Under Kraaz , innkeepers owe a high degree of care, which embraces a duty to take reasonable precautions against criminal assaults on guests." The Banks court was making the point that the duty to take precautions against third party criminal acts was only one aspect of the high degree of care owed by the innkeeper in connection with tort liability generally.

11996–1996
State, in Interest of Ae and Jd green
lactapp · 1984
1 sentence

1988State in the Interest of A.E., supra, citing Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981); State In Re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

11988–1988
Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy green
scotus · 1961
2 sentences

1988State in the Interest of A.E., supra, citing Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981); State In Re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

1988State in the Interest of A.E., supra, citing Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981); State In Re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

11988–1988
Stanley v. Illinois green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

1988State in the Interest of A.E., supra, citing Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981); State In Re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

1988State in the Interest of A.E., supra, citing Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 , 81 S.Ct. 1743 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 , 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981); State In Re Delcuze, 407 So.2d 707 (La.1981).

11988–1988
Mathews v. Eldridge green
scotus · 1976
2 sentences

1984In Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), the United States Supreme Court defined due process standards which the Court has applied in parental rights termination cases.

1984In Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), the United States Supreme Court defined due process standards which the Court has applied in parental rights termination cases.

11984–1984
McMichael v. Williams neutral
lactapp · 1959
1 sentence

1983Our holding as to this portion of the judgment is consistent with the required standards related to boundary surveys as set forth in McMichael v. Williams, 111 So.2d 542 (La.App. 1st Cir.1959) where the court stated: “However, any line established by survey must be verified and its location substantiated by credible corroborative evidence upon which the courts can act with reasonable assurance of doing substantial justice as between the adverse litigants. * ⅜: * * ⅜ * The procedure adopted by Webb (the surveyor) impresses us as being unsound, arbitrary and not in keeping with the highest stand

11983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 32:212 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 32:213 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 32:214 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 44 (1895–2026) PA 44 (1967–2026) OH 43 (1976–2026) CA 30 (1971–2024) MN 18 (1939–2026) MO 18 (1914–2023) LA 17 (1983–2025) WA 15 (1972–2026) NJ 13 (1973–2024) IA 11 (1990–2017) NY 11 (1901–2000) CT 9 (1995–2019) TX 9 (1924–2016) GA 9 (1907–2013) MD 8 (1986–2022) IN 8 (1978–2025) FL 7 (1988–2022) MA 7 (1978–2026) MT 6 (1927–2004) MS 6 (1974–2023) DE 6 (2017–2025) OR 6 (1980–2023) CO 6 (1987–2021) KS 5 (2013–2026) TN 4 (1951–2004) KY 4 (1939–2025) AK 4 (1998–2024) MI 3 (2001–2022) WV 3 (1986–2020) DC 3 (1979–2000) WY 3 (1987–2007) NM 3 (2012–2018) ME 3 (1981–2003) NC 3 (2001–2026) SC 2 (1922–2013) VA 2 (2018–2025) HI 2 (1999–2005) UT 2 (1998–2011) WI 2 (1909–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check