Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hein v. Oriental Gardens, Inc.green2 sentences2009The party claiming instructional error has the burden of proving “ ‘that the instruction as submitted misdirected, misled, or confused the jury.’ ” Id. (quoting Hein v. Oriental Gardens, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 632, 634 (Mo.App. 2007The party claiming instructional error has the task of showing “ ‘that the instruction as submitted misdirected, misled or confused the jury.’ ” Martens v. White, 195 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Mo.App.2006) (quoting Hein v. Oriental Gardens, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 632, 634 (Mo.App.1999)). | 3 | 4 |
Sorrell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.green2 sentences2017Co., 249 S.W.3d 207, 209 (Mo. banc 2008). 2016Co., 249 S.W.3d 207, 209 (Mo. banc 2008) (“To reverse on grounds of instructional error, the party claiming instructional error must establish that the instruction at issue misdirected, mislead, or confused the jury. | 3 | 3 |
Howard v. City of Kansas Citygreen2 sentences2024“We will reverse the verdict ‘only if the party claiming instructional error establishes that the instructions at issue misdirected, misled, or confused the jury, resulting in prejudicial error.”” Jd. (quoting Howard v. City of Kansas City, 332 S.W.3d 772, 790 (Mo. banc 2011)). 2015This Court will only reverse a verdict for instructional error “if the party claiming instructional error establishes that the instruction at issue misdirected, misled, or confused the jury, resulting in prejudicial error.” Id. at 790 . | 1 | 3 |
Martens v. Whitegreen2 sentences2009The party claiming instructional error has the burden of proving “ ‘that the instruction as submitted misdirected, misled, or confused the jury.’ ” Id. (quoting Hein v. Oriental Gardens, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 632, 634 (Mo.App. 2007The party claiming instructional error has the task of showing “ ‘that the instruction as submitted misdirected, misled or confused the jury.’ ” Martens v. White, 195 S.W.3d 548, 557 (Mo.App.2006) (quoting Hein v. Oriental Gardens, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 632, 634 (Mo.App.1999)). | 1 | 2 |
Steward v. ABU BONDING INC.green1 sentence2011Kan., 240 S.W.3d 175, 183 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Jone v. Coleman Co.green1 sentence2009Jone v. Coleman Corp., 183 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Alexander v. American Lodging, Inc.green1 sentence2000Wal-Mart argues that it was not required to remove any naturally accumulating snow or ice which constituted a condition general to the community, citing authorities such as Maxwell v. City of Hayti 985 S.W.2d 920, 921-22 (Mo.App. 1999); Alexander v. American Lodging Inc., 786 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Mo.App.1990); Milford v. May Dept. | 1 | 1 |
Maxwell v. City of Haytigreen1 sentence2000Wal-Mart argues that it was not required to remove any naturally accumulating snow or ice which constituted a condition general to the community, citing authorities such as Maxwell v. City of Hayti 985 S.W.2d 920, 921-22 (Mo.App. 1999); Alexander v. American Lodging Inc., 786 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Mo.App.1990); Milford v. May Dept. | 1 | 1 |
Judy v. Arkansas Log Homes, Inc.green1 sentence1999Judy v. Arkansas Log Homes, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 409, 420 (Mo.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Harrisonville, Appellant-Respondent v. McCall Service Stations d/b/a Big Tank Oil, the Missouri Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.
green
2 sentences2016Fleshner, 304 S.W.3d at 90-91 . 2016Fleshner, 304 S.W.3d at 90-91 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Harvey v. Washington
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Gorman v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.