Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squiergreen2 sentences1993Accord Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991). 1993Accord Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991). | 3 | 3 |
Maack v. School District of Lincolngreen2 sentences1993“To be considered by an appellate court, an error must be assigned and discussed in the brief of the one claiming that prejudicial error has occurred.” Maack v. School Dist. of Lincoln, 241 Neb. 847, 861 , 491 N.W.2d 341, 350 (1992). 1993“To be considered by an appellate court, an error must be assigned and discussed in the brief of the one claiming that prejudicial error has occurred.” Maack v. School Dist. of Lincoln, 241 Neb. 847, 861 , 491 N.W.2d 341, 350 (1992). | 2 | 4 |
Fee v. Feegreen2 sentences1989Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)(d) (rev. 1989) provides, “[Consideration of the case will be limited to errors assigned and discussed” (Emphasis supplied.) “To be considered by this court, errors must be assigned and discussed in the brief of the one claiming that prejudicial error has occurred.” Fee v. Fee, 223 Neb. 128, 134 , 388 N.W.2d 122, 126 (1986). 1989Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)(d) (rev. 1989) provides, “[Consideration of the case will be limited to errors assigned and discussed” (Emphasis supplied.) “To be considered by this court, errors must be assigned and discussed in the brief of the one claiming that prejudicial error has occurred.” Fee v. Fee, 223 Neb. 128, 134 , 388 N.W.2d 122, 126 (1986). | 2 | 4 |
Bohaty v. Briardgreen2 sentences1989See, also, Bohaty v. Briard, 219 Neb. 42 , 361 N.W.2d 502 (1985) (argument is an effort to establish belief by a course of reasoning). 1989See, also, Bohaty v. Briard, 219 Neb. 42 , 361 N.W.2d 502 (1985) (argument is an effort to establish belief by a course of reasoning). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vermuele
green
2 sentences1994State v. Vermuele, 241 Neb. 923 , 492 N.W.2d 24 (1992). 1994State v. Vermuele, 241 Neb. 923 , 492 N.W.2d 24 (1992). | 3 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Dyer
green
2 sentences2003State v. Dyer, 245 Neb. 385 , 513 N.W.2d 316 (1994). 2003State v. Dyer, 245 Neb. 385 , 513 N.W.2d 316 (1994). | 2 | 1997–2003 |
Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Victor
green
2 sentences1993Accord, Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991); Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Victor, 232 Neb. 351 , 440 N.W.2d 667 (1989). 1993Accord, Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991); Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Victor, 232 Neb. 351 , 440 N.W.2d 667 (1989). | 2 | 1992–1993 |
Lange v. Crouse Cartage Co.
green
2 sentences2005Lange v. Crouse Cartage Co., 253 Neb. 718 , 572 N.W.2d 351 (1998). 2005Lange v. Crouse Cartage Co., 253 Neb. 718 , 572 N.W.2d 351 (1998). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Gravel v. Schmidt
green
1 sentence1995Gravel v. Schmidt, ante p. 404, 527 N.W.2d 199 (1995). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Lange Industries, Inc. v. Hallam Grain Co.
green
2 sentences1994Lange Indus. v. Hallam Grain Co., 244 Neb. 465 , 507 N.W.2d 465 (1993). 1994Lange Indus. v. Hallam Grain Co., 244 Neb. 465 , 507 N.W.2d 465 (1993). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Myers
green
2 sentences1994State v. Myers, 244 Neb. 905 , 510 N.W.2d 58 (1993); State v. Vermuele, 241 Neb. 923 , 492 N.W.2d 24 (1992). 1994State v. Myers, 244 Neb. 905 , 510 N.W.2d 58 (1993); State v. Vermuele, 241 Neb. 923 , 492 N.W.2d 24 (1992). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Copple
green
2 sentences1992See, Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991); Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Victor, 232 Neb. 351 , 440 N.W.2d 667 (1989); State v. Copple, 224 Neb. 672 , 401 N.W.2d 141 (1987); Neb. 1992See, Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. Squier, 238 Neb. 748 , 472 N.W.2d 391 (1991); Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Victor, 232 Neb. 351 , 440 N.W.2d 667 (1989); State v. Copple, 224 Neb. 672 , 401 N.W.2d 141 (1987); Neb. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.