Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1991–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1998When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) White v. State, 221 Ga. App. 860, 861 (1) ( 473 SE2d 539 ) (1996). 1998When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) White v. State, 221 Ga. App. 860, 861 (1) ( 473 SE2d 539 ) (1996). | 7 | 7 |
Robinson v. Stategreen2 sentences1998“When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Citation omitted.) Robinson v. State, 200 Ga. App. 515, 518 (2) (b) ( 408 SE2d 820 ) (1991). 1998“When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Citation omitted.) Robinson v. State, 200 Ga. App. 515, 518 (2) (b) ( 408 SE2d 820 ) (1991). | 6 | 6 |
West v. Nodvingreen2 sentences1991When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (Murphy, supra) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned (West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4c) ( 397 SE2d 567 )). 1991When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (Murphy, supra) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned (West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4c) ( 397 SE2d 567 )). | 5 | 5 |
Griffin v. Stategreen2 sentences1998“When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Punctuation omitted.) Griffin v. State, 228 Ga. App. 200, 201 ( 491 SE2d 437 ) (1997). 1998“When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining assertions of error therein as abandoned.” (Punctuation omitted.) Griffin v. State, 228 Ga. App. 200, 201 ( 491 SE2d 437 ) (1997). | 2 | 2 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Brown v. State, 191 Ga. App. 76, 79 (4) ( 381 SE2d 101 ) (1989) (“[a]n appellant cannot expand his enumerations of error by brief to include issues not raised in the enumerations of error”); see also White v. State, 221 Ga. App. 860, 861 (1) ( 473 SE2d 539 ) (1996) (“ £[w]hen an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (cit.) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumera tion and treat the remain 1997See Brown v. State, 191 Ga. App. 76, 79 (4) ( 381 SE2d 101 ) (1989) (“[a]n appellant cannot expand his enumerations of error by brief to include issues not raised in the enumerations of error”); see also White v. State, 221 Ga. App. 860, 861 (1) ( 473 SE2d 539 ) (1996) (“ £[w]hen an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (cit.) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumera tion and treat the remain | 2 | 2 |
Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.green2 sentences1997Co., 208 Ga. App. 598, 606 (6) ( 431 SE2d 383 ), cert. den., 510 U. S. 1195 (114 SC 1303, 127 LE2d 655); West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4) (c) ( 397 SE2d 567 ); see Hap Farms v. Heard, 209 Ga. App. 684, 686 (1) (c) ( 434 SE2d 118 ). 1997Co., 208 Ga. App. 598, 606 (6) ( 431 SE2d 383 ), cert. den., 510 U. S. 1195 (114 SC 1303, 127 LE2d 655); West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4) (c) ( 397 SE2d 567 ); see Hap Farms v. Heard, 209 Ga. App. 684, 686 (1) (c) ( 434 SE2d 118 ). | 2 | 2 |
Hap Farms, Inc. v. Heardgreen2 sentences1997Co., 208 Ga. App. 598, 606 (6) ( 431 SE2d 383 ), cert. den., 510 U. S. 1195 (114 SC 1303, 127 LE2d 655); West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4) (c) ( 397 SE2d 567 ); see Hap Farms v. Heard, 209 Ga. App. 684, 686 (1) (c) ( 434 SE2d 118 ). 1997Co., 208 Ga. App. 598, 606 (6) ( 431 SE2d 383 ), cert. den., 510 U. S. 1195 (114 SC 1303, 127 LE2d 655); West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4) (c) ( 397 SE2d 567 ); see Hap Farms v. Heard, 209 Ga. App. 684, 686 (1) (c) ( 434 SE2d 118 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. State
green
2 sentences1994When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (Murphy, supra) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining [enumerations] as abandoned. 1993When an appellant argues more than one error within a single enumeration, this court in its discretion may elect to review none of the errors so enumerated in violation of OCGA § 5-6-40 (Murphy, supra) or elect to review any one or more of the several assertions of error contained within the single enumeration and treat the remaining [enumerations] as abandoned. | 4 | 1991–1994 |
Gonzales v. Carter
green
1 sentence1997Co., 208 Ga. App. 598, 606 (6) ( 431 SE2d 383 ), cert. den., 510 U. S. 1195 (114 SC 1303, 127 LE2d 655); West v. Nodvin, 196 Ga. App. 825, 830 (4) (c) ( 397 SE2d 567 ); see Hap Farms v. Heard, 209 Ga. App. 684, 686 (1) (c) ( 434 SE2d 118 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.