Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perkins Restaurants Operating Co. v. Van Den Bergh Foods Co.green2 sentences2005“Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.” Perkins Restaurants , 276 Ill. 2005“Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.” Perkins Restaurants, 276 Ill. | 5 | 7 |
First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddickgreen2 sentences2025Id. ¶ 33 This “limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.” First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. 2017Moreover, “ ‘[l]imited -8 2017 IL App (2d) 160799 judicial review of arbitration awards fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Id. ¶ 18 (quoting First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. | 5 | 5 |
Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest Hospitalgreen2 sentences2026Id. “ ‘Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest Hospital, 359 Ill. 2025Id. “ ‘Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest Hospital, 359 Ill. | 4 | 5 |
Town of Cicero v. Illinois Ass'n of Firefightersgreen1 sentence2025Town of Cicero v. Illinois Ass’n of Firefighters, IAFF Local 717 AFL-CIO, CLC, 338 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. State
green
2 sentences2026Id. “ ‘Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest Hospital, 359 Ill. 2025Id. “ ‘Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest Hospital, 359 Ill. | 3 | 2025–2026 |
Garver v. Ferguson
green
2 sentences2003App. 3d 191, 195 , 419 N.E.2d 940 (1981)), and limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning, of litigation (Garver v. Ferguson, 76 Ill. 2d 1, 9 , 389 N.E.2d 1181 (1979)). 2003App. 3d 191, 195 , 419 N.E.2d 940 (1981)), and limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning, of litigation (Garver v. Ferguson, 76 Ill. 2d 1, 9 , 389 N.E.2d 1181 (1979)). | 3 | 1995–2003 |
GPS USA, Inc. v. Performance Powdercoating
green
2 sentences2017Moreover, “ ‘[l]imited judicial review of arbitration awards fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Id. ¶ 18 (quoting First -5- Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. 2015App. 3d 40, 48 (2009). ¶ 19 Section 12 of the Uniform Arbitration Act (Act) (710 ILCS 5/12 (West 2012)) specifies grounds for vacating an arbitration award, stating in relevant part: “(a) Upon application of a party, the court shall vacate an award where: (1) The award was procured by corruption, fraud or other undue means; (2) There was evident partiality by an arbitrator appointed as a neutral or corruption in any one of the arbitrators or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party; (3) The arbitrators exceeded their powers; (4) The arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon suffic | 2 | 2015–2017 |
Salsitz v. Kreiss
green
2 sentences2015“The courts of this state favor arbitration as well.” Id. ¶ 18 The favorability of arbitration is further reflected in the principles governing judicial review of arbitration awards: “[J]udicial review of an arbitrator’s award is extremely limited, more limited than appellate review of a trial. [Citations.] Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation. [Citation.] When parties agree to submit a dispute to arbitration for a binding and nonappealable decision, they bargain for finality. [Ci 2015“The courts of this state favor arbitration as well.” Id. ¶ 18 The favorability of arbitration is further reflected in the principles governing judicial review of arbitration awards: “[J]udicial review of an arbitrator’s award is extremely limited, more limited than appellate review of a trial. [Citations.] Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation. [Citation.] When parties agree to submit a dispute to arbitration for a binding and nonappealable decision, they bargain for finality. [Ci | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Seither & Cherry Co. v. Illinois Bank Building Corp.
green
2 sentences2003App. 3d 191, 195 , 419 N.E.2d 940 (1981)), and limited judicial review fosters the long accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning, of litigation ( Garver v. Ferguson , 76 Ill. 2d 1, 9 , 389 N.E.2d 1181 (1979)). 2003App. 3d 191, 195 , 419 N.E.2d 940 (1981)), and limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning, of litigation (Garver v. Ferguson, 76 Ill. 2d 1, 9 , 389 N.E.2d 1181 (1979)). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Galasso v. KNS Companies, Inc.
green
1 sentence2025Id. ¶ 33 This “limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.” First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In re Marriage of Haleas
green
2 sentences2017Moreover, “ ‘[l]imited -8 2017 IL App (2d) 160799 judicial review of arbitration awards fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Id. ¶ 18 (quoting First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. 2017Moreover, “ ‘[l]imited -8 2017 IL App (2d) 160799 judicial review of arbitration awards fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning of litigation.’ ” Id. ¶ 18 (quoting First Health Group Corp. v. Ruddick, 393 Ill. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Christian Dior, Inc. v. Schaffner & Marx
green
1 sentence1995App. 3d 427, 431 , 637 N.E.2d 546 .) Limited judicial review fosters the long-accepted and encouraged principle that an arbitration award should be the end, not the beginning, of litigation. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.