110 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginiared2 sentences2010Pursuant to Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 2010Pursuant to Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 3 | 102 |
State v. Jacobsgreen2 sentences2004See State v. Jacobs, 504 So.2d 817 (La.1987). 14The defendant was convicted under La. 2004See State v. Jacobs, 504 So.2d 817 (La.1987). | 3 | 20 |
State v. Rosieregreen2 sentences2003Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Rosiere, 488 So.2d 965 (La.1986). 2003Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Rosiere, 488 So.2d 965 (La.1986). | 2 | 48 |
State v. Greengreen2 sentences2025“The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Green, 588 So.2d 757, 758 (La. 1995Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Green, 588 So.2d 757 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Harrisgreen1 sentence1996Specifically, the appellant argues that the evidence did not show that he was aware of the cocaine in the kitchen or that he possessed or attempted to possess the cocaine. |3The standard of review of a claim of insufficient evidence in a drug possession case was set forth by this Court in State v. Harris, 585 So.2d 649, 650 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1991): The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reason | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fuller
green
2 sentences1996Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Fuller, 414 So.2d 306 (La.1982). 1994Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Jacobs, 504 So.2d 817 (La.1987); State v. Fuller, 414 So.2d 306 (La.1982). | 23 | 1989–1996 |
State v. Hawkins
green
2 sentences2002Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), 688 So.2d 473 . 2001Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), 688 So.2d 473 . | 5 | 2000–2002 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2000In State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/19/95); 649 So.2d 1078, 1081 , this court set forth the standard for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence to support a defendant's conviction when it stated: The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 1998In State v. Smith, 94-1502, p. 2 (La.App. 4th Cir 1/19/95), 649 So.2d 1078, 1081 , this court set forth the standard for an appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence to support a defendant’s conviction: The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 3 | 1998–2000 |
State v. Tate
green
1 sentence2026App. 4 Cir. 6/10/21), 323 So.3d 957 , 971 (first citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); and then citing State v. Tate, 2001-1658, p. 4 (La. 5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 928 ). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State of Louisiana v. Rodricus C. Crawford
green
1 sentence2024See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S. Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ( 1979); State v. Crawford, 2014- 2153 ( La. 11/ 16/ 16), 218 So. 3d 13, 26 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Coleman
neutral
1 sentence2022State v. Coleman, 142 So.3d at 139 . 22-KA-112 23 Reviewing defendant’s complaints in light of these factors, we find that errors by the trial court in restricting defendant’s questioning of witnesses, if any, were harmless. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Pierre
green
1 sentence2020App. 4 Cir. 2/25/04), 869 So.2d 246, 248 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Mims
green
1 sentence2006Reviewing defendant's sentence for constitutional excessiveness, State v. Mims, supra , we note the following. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Young
green
1 sentence2003We recently summarized the standards for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims in State v. Young, 2002-1280, p. 10, n. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), 839 So.2d 186, 194 , writ denied, 2003-0599 (La. 10/17/03), 855 So.2d 756 , stating: |RIt is well-settled that the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found all of the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Wix
green
1 sentence2003We recently summarized the standards for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims in State v. Young, 2002-1280, p. 10, n. 7 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), 839 So.2d 186, 194 , writ denied, 2003-0599 (La. 10/17/03), 855 So.2d 756 , stating: |RIt is well-settled that the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found all of the essential elements of the offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Cashen
green
1 sentence2002(See State v. Cashen, 544 So.2d 1268 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989); State v. Mussall, 523 So.2d 1305 (La.1988); and Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Mussall
green
1 sentence2002(See State v. Cashen, 544 So.2d 1268 (La.App. 4th Cir.1989); State v. Mussall, 523 So.2d 1305 (La.1988); and Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2001State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), 669 So.2d 364, 375 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 860 , 117 S.Ct. 162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Garner v. United States
green
1 sentence2001State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), 669 So.2d 364, 375 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 860 , 117 S.Ct. 162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Brewington v. Woodard
green
2 sentences2001State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), 669 So.2d 364, 375 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 860 , 117 S.Ct. 162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996). 2001State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), 669 So.2d 364, 375 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 860 , 117 S.Ct. 162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Alford
green
1 sentence2001State v. Williams, 546 So.2d 963 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1989), citing State v. Alford, 323 So.2d 788 (La.1975). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Williams
neutral
1 sentence2001State v. Williams, 546 So.2d 963 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1989), citing State v. Alford, 323 So.2d 788 (La.1975). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Edwards
green
1 sentence1986Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Edwards, 400 So.2d 1370 (La.1981). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.