reviewing immunity (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

reviewing immunity in Minnesota

5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1986–1998 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Pletan v. Gainesgreen
minn · 1992 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–1998
2 sentences

1998“A court reviewing immunity issues must examine with particularity the nature of the conduct the plaintiff alleges as the basis of a negligence claim.” Watson, 553 N.W.2d at 411 (citing Pletan v. Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38, 40 (Minn.1992)).

1996Pletan v. Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38, 40 (Minn.1992).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission green
minn · 1996
2 sentences

1998“A court reviewing immunity issues must examine with particularity the nature of the conduct the plaintiff alleges as the basis of a negligence claim.” Watson, 553 N.W.2d at 411 (citing Pletan v. Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38, 40 (Minn.1992)).

1997“A court reviewing immunity issues must examine with particularity the nature of the conduct the plaintiff alleges as the basis of a negligence claim.” Watson, 553 N.W.2d at 411 .

21997–1998
Strickland v. Washington green
scotus · 1984
1 sentence

1987The defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action “might be considered sound trial strategy.” Id.

11987–1987
State v. Ulvinen green
minn · 1981
1 sentence

1986In State v. Ulvinen, 313 N.W.2d 425 (Minn.1981), the Minnesota Supreme Court, explaining the standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, said: In reviewing a claim of sufficiency of the evidence we must determine whether, under the facts in the record and any *16 legitimate inferences that can be drawn from them, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.

11986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MN § Minn. Stat. § 466.03 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 110 (1986–2026) TX 34 (1991–2025) AL 31 (1993–2017) MO 31 (1986–2025) OH 29 (1991–2026) IN 27 (1981–2020) IL 24 (1983–2026) MI 22 (1970–2026) PA 19 (1976–2026) CA 16 (1973–2024) CT 14 (1985–2025) NY 10 (1997–2012) NJ 7 (1981–2025) TN 6 (1989–2013) KS 6 (1911–2023) GA 5 (2000–2010) MN 5 (1986–1998) WV 4 (2006–2024) FL 4 (1984–2010) MD 4 (1981–2025) WI 3 (2017–2019) AR 3 (2020–2025) RI 3 (1977–1995) OR 3 (2002–2024) MS 3 (2000–2001) WA 3 (1910–2019) DC 2 (1993–2016) HI 2 (2016–2024) MT 2 (1979–2001) MA 2 (2009–2023) NC 2 (1984–2017) VA 2 (1997–2006) CO 2 (2017–2017) OK 2 (1984–2006) VT 2 (2010–2021) WY 2 (2000–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check