Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2026People v LaFountain, 495 Mich 968 , 970; 844 NW2d 5 (2014), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (“Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”). 2026People v LaFountain, 495 Mich 968 , 970; 844 NW2d 5 (2014), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (“Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”). | 6 | 12 |
People v. Haggartgreen2 sentences2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p 2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p | 2 | 2 |
People v. Nyxgreen2 sentences2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p 2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rileygreen2 sentences2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p 2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p | 2 | 2 |
People v. Griffingreen2 sentences2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p 2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p | 2 | 2 |
Moody v. Home Owners Insurancegreen2 sentences2016Under the invited-error doctrine, appellate relief is generally not available because “when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.” A related rule is that error requiring reversal may only be predicated on the trial court’s actions and not upon alleged error to which the aggrieved party contributed by plan or negligence. -3- [Moody v Home Owners Ins Co, 304 Mich App 415, 438-439 ; 849 NW2d 31 (2014) (citations and quotation marks omitted).] In this case, defendant initially asserted in its affirmative defenses that the benefits c 2015See Moody v Homes Owners Inc Co, 304 Mich App 415, 438 ; 849 NW2d 31 (2014), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (“Under the invited-error doctrine, appellate relief is generally not available because ‘when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.’ ”). | 1 | 2 |
People v. Cartergreen2 sentences2014People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6 (2003) (“Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”), citing People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 214-215 (2000). 2003People v Carter, 462 Mich 206, 214-215 ; 612 NW2d 144 (2000). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vannoy v. City of Warren
green
2 sentences2019For example, in Vannoy v City of Warren, 386 Mich 686, 690 ; 194 NW2d 304 (1972), this Court explained that a party cannot seek appellate review of an instruction that he himself requested, saying, “Assuming error as claimed, that error comes within the purview of what of tradition and common sense is known as ‘invited error.’ ” Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished. [Cassidy v Cassidy, 318 Mich App 463 , 476; 899 NW2d 65 , 75, lv den 501 Mich 908 (2017), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich 2019For example, in Vannoy v City of Warren, 386 Mich 686, 690 ; 194 NW2d 304 (1972), this Court explained that a party cannot seek appellate review of an instruction that he himself requested, saying, “Assuming error as claimed, that error comes within the purview of what of tradition and common sense is known as ‘invited error.’ ” Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished. [Cassidy v Cassidy, 318 Mich App 463 , 476; 899 NW2d 65 , 75, lv den 501 Mich 908 (2017), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich | 3 | 2003–2019 |
Lewis v. LeGrow
green
2 sentences2019For example, in Vannoy v City of Warren, 386 Mich 686, 690 ; 194 NW2d 304 (1972), this Court explained that a party cannot seek appellate review of an instruction that he himself requested, saying, “Assuming error as claimed, that error comes within the purview of what of tradition and common sense is known as ‘invited error.’ ” Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished. [Cassidy v Cassidy, 318 Mich App 463 , 476; 899 NW2d 65 , 75, lv den 501 Mich 908 (2017), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich 2019For example, in Vannoy v City of Warren, 386 Mich 686, 690 ; 194 NW2d 304 (1972), this Court explained that a party cannot seek appellate review of an instruction that he himself requested, saying, “Assuming error as claimed, that error comes within the purview of what of tradition and common sense is known as ‘invited error.’ ” Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished. [Cassidy v Cassidy, 318 Mich App 463 , 476; 899 NW2d 65 , 75, lv den 501 Mich 908 (2017), quoting People v Jones, 468 Mich | 3 | 2014–2019 |
Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, Inc
green
2 sentences2025See People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (“Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate view, and any error is extinguished.”); Blazer Foods, Inc v Restaurant Props, Inc, 259 Mich App 241, 252 ; 673 NW2d 805 (2003) (stating that a party may not take a position in the trial court and later seek redress on appeal that is based on a position contrary to that earlier position). 2025See People v Jones, 468 Mich 345 , 352 n 6; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (“Appellate review is precluded because when a party invites the error, he waives his right to seek appellate view, and any error is extinguished.”); Blazer Foods, Inc v Restaurant Props, Inc, 259 Mich App 241, 252 ; 673 NW2d 805 (2003) (stating that a party may not take a position in the trial court and later seek redress on appeal that is based on a position contrary to that earlier position). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p 2021People v Haggart, 142 Mich App 330, 337-338 (1985); cf. People v Riley, 465 Mich 442, 448 (2001) (reaching the same conclusion, without using the phrase “invited error,” to prevent a defendant from challenging 28 See also People v Nyx, 479 Mich 112 , 128 n 43 (2007) (“[W]hen a party invites the error, the party waives the right to seek appellate review, and any error is extinguished.”); People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 46 (1999) (holding that the defendant had waived appellate review of an issue “[b]ecause error requiring reversal cannot be error to which the aggrieved party contributed by p | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.