adversarial balance between defense (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

adversarial balance between defense in Oklahoma

16 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kimmelman v. Morrisongreen
scotus · 1986 · cited in 16 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1997–2000
2 sentences

2000Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, interpreting Strickland , has held: [an appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verd

2000Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, interpreting Strickland , has held: [an appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verd

1516
Strickland v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 15 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1997–2000
2 sentences

2000Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, interpreting Strickland , has held: [an appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verd

2000Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, interpreting Strickland , has held: [an appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verd

115

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Nix v. Whiteside green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2000Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, interpreting Strickland , has held: [an appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verd

1999Concerning the prejudice prong, the Supreme Court, in interpreting Strickland , has held: [An appellant] alleging prejudice must show "that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." Strickland, 466 U.S., at 687 , 104 S.Ct., at 2064 ; see also Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) ("The essence of an ineffective-assistance claim is that counsel's unprofessional errors so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the v

151997–2000
Lockhart v. Fretwell green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

1997To show “prejudice”, an appellant must show that his attorney’s unprofessional errors “so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict rendered suspect.” Lockhart, 506 U.S. at 369 , 113 S.Ct. at 842 (quoting Kimmelman v. Morrison 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986)).

1997To show “prejudice”, an appellant must show that his attorney’s unprofessional errors “so upset the adversarial balance between defense and prosecution that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict rendered suspect.” Lockhart, 506 U.S. at 369 , 113 S.Ct. at 842 (quoting Kimmelman v. Morrison 477 U.S. 365, 374 , 106 S.Ct. 2574, 2582 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986)).

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.7 (9) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.12 (7) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2403 (5) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.13 (5) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.10 (4) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1088.1 (4) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2401 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2701 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 701.8 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1084 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1086 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OK 16 (1997–2000) PA 7 (1988–2025) CA 5 (2013–2018) IL 4 (2000–2006) MD 4 (1999–2018) FL 3 (1998–2007) WI 3 (1995–2021) TX 3 (2015–2025) MO 2 (1987–1987) IN 2 (1997–1998) VA 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check