collateral estoppel is embodied doctrine (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

collateral estoppel is embodied doctrine in Washington

16 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Ashe v. Swenson green
scotus · 1970
2 sentences

2004“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003) (citing Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S. Ct. 1189 , 25 L.

2004“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003) (citing Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S. Ct. 1189 , 25 L.

151997–2025
State v. Tili green
wash · 2003
2 sentences

2025“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003).

2004“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003) (citing Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S. Ct. 1189 , 25 L.

42004–2025
State v. Tili green
wash · 2003
2 sentences

2025“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003).

2004“The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranty against double jeopardy.” State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 360 , 60 P.3d 1192 (2003) (citing Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 , 90 S. Ct. 1189 , 25 L.

42004–2025
State v. Linton green
washctapp · 2004
2 sentences

2005App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wn.2d at 391 ), review granted, 153 Wn.2d 1017 (2005). ¶19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

2005State v. Linton, 122 Wash.App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wash.2d at 391 , 341 P.2d 481 ), review granted, 153 Wash.2d 1017 , 108 P.3d 1229 (2005). ¶ 19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

22005–2005
State v. Schoel green
wash · 1959
2 sentences

2005App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wn.2d at 391 ), review granted, 153 Wn.2d 1017 (2005). ¶19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

2005State v. Linton, 122 Wash.App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wash.2d at 391 , 341 P.2d 481 ), review granted, 153 Wash.2d 1017 , 108 P.3d 1229 (2005). ¶ 19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

22005–2005
State v. Linton green
wash · 2005
2 sentences

2005App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wn.2d at 391 ), review granted, 153 Wn.2d 1017 (2005). ¶19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

2005State v. Linton, 122 Wash.App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wash.2d at 391 , 341 P.2d 481 ), review granted, 153 Wash.2d 1017 , 108 P.3d 1229 (2005). ¶ 19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

22005–2005
Overby v. City of Battle Ground green
wash · 2005
1 sentence

2005State v. Linton, 122 Wash.App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wash.2d at 391 , 341 P.2d 481 ), review granted, 153 Wash.2d 1017 , 108 P.3d 1229 (2005). ¶ 19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

12005–2005
State v. Linton green
washctapp · 2004
1 sentence

2005State v. Linton, 122 Wash.App. 73, 76 , 93 P.3d 183 (2004) (citing Schoel, 54 Wash.2d at 391 , 341 P.2d 481 ), review granted, 153 Wash.2d 1017 , 108 P.3d 1229 (2005). ¶ 19 The doctrine of collateral estoppel is embodied in the constitutional guaranty against double jeopardy.

12005–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.589 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 16 (1997–2025) MD 5 (1979–2002) GA 4 (1985–2009) IL 3 (1977–1990) ME 3 (2004–2010) FL 3 (1976–2001) PA 3 (1972–1979) OH 2 (1983–1994) TX 2 (1983–2023) CA 2 (2000–2000) IN 2 (1974–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check