well-understood rule in Alabama

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1960Penton v. Penton, 223 Ala. 282 , 135 So. 481 ; Jones v. Keith, 223 Ala. 36 , 134 So. 630 ; Yates v. Barnett, 215 Ala. 554 , 112 So. 122 ; Burton & Sons v. May, 212 Ala. 435 , 103 So. 46 ; Oden-Elliott Lumber Co. v. Daniel-Gaddis Lumber Co., 210 Ala. 582 , 98 So. 730 ; Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.

1997It is a well-understood principle of law that the trial court is vested with the authority "to manage its affairs in order to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases." Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc., 553 So.2d 82 (Ala.1989).

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1946Patton v. Darden, 227 Ala. 129 , 148 So. 806 ; Taylor v. Burgett, 207 Ala. 54 , 91 So. 786 ; Johnston v. Harsh, 207 Ala. 524 , 93 So. 451 ; Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co., 207 Ala. 553 , 93 So. 604 .

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936Or, as expressed by this court in a concrete case (Hamby v. Hamby, 165 Ala. 171 , 51 So. 732, 733 , 138 Am.St.Rep. 23 ): “If, on a bill filed for that purpose, the chancery court assumes jurisdiction of the administration of an estate, all incidental questions may and must be there settled, and nothing can thereafter be done in the probate court.” And in Ex parte Jonas, 186 Ala. 567 , 64 So. 960, 962 , was the observation that “the administration of the trust estate is subject to the jurisdiction of the chancery court, and, when that juris *552 diction is rightfully assumed, that the trust is

1936As well stated by the court in Timmons v. People’s Trust Co., 114 W.Va. 618 , 173 S.E. 79, 81 , “Prior to the insolvency of a bank, the claim of an ordinary depositor is personal; but, after insolvency, his claim becomes communal and is subject to class treatment,” and, as said in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Tomlinson, 55 S.D. 185 , 225 N.W. 305, 306 , “the property of the failed bank is virtually in custodia legis.” The regulation and enforcement of trusts is one of the original and inherent powers of a court of equity (21 Corpus Juris 116), and it is also a well-understood principle that a

1936As well stated by the court in Timmons v. People’s Trust Co., 114 W.Va. 618 , 173 S.E. 79, 81 , “Prior to the insolvency of a bank, the claim of an ordinary depositor is personal; but, after insolvency, his claim becomes communal and is subject to class treatment,” and, as said in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Tomlinson, 55 S.D. 185 , 225 N.W. 305, 306 , “the property of the failed bank is virtually in custodia legis.” The regulation and enforcement of trusts is one of the original and inherent powers of a court of equity (21 Corpus Juris 116), and it is also a well-understood principle that a

1936As well stated by the court in Timmons v. People’s Trust Co., 114 W.Va. 618 , 173 S.E. 79, 81 , “Prior to the insolvency of a bank, the claim of an ordinary depositor is personal; but, after insolvency, his claim becomes communal and is subject to class treatment,” and, as said in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Tomlinson, 55 S.D. 185 , 225 N.W. 305, 306 , “the property of the failed bank is virtually in custodia legis.” The regulation and enforcement of trusts is one of the original and inherent powers of a court of equity (21 Corpus Juris 116), and it is also a well-understood principle that a

1936As well stated by the court in Timmons v. People’s Trust Co., 114 W.Va. 618 , 173 S.E. 79, 81 , “Prior to the insolvency of a bank, the claim of an ordinary depositor is personal; but, after insolvency, his claim becomes communal and is subject to class treatment,” and, as said in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Tomlinson, 55 S.D. 185 , 225 N.W. 305, 306 , “the property of the failed bank is virtually in custodia legis.” The regulation and enforcement of trusts is one of the original and inherent powers of a court of equity (21 Corpus Juris 116), and it is also a well-understood principle that a

1931Drake v. Scott, 136 Ala. 261 , 33 So. 873 , 96 Am.

1924Pearce v. Mills, 190 Ala. 616 . 67 South. 581 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250 , 15 South 568 ; Larry v. Brown, 153 Ala. 452 , 44 South. 841 .

1924Pearce v. Mills, 190 Ala. 616 . 67 South. 581 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250 , 15 South 568 ; Larry v. Brown, 153 Ala. 452 , 44 South. 841 .

1924Pearce v. Mills, 190 Ala. 616 . 67 South. 581 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250 , 15 South 568 ; Larry v. Brown, 153 Ala. 452 , 44 South. 841 .

1924Pearce v. Mills, 190 Ala. 616 . 67 South. 581 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250 , 15 South 568 ; Larry v. Brown, 153 Ala. 452 , 44 South. 841 .

1924Pearce v. Mills, 190 Ala. 616 . 67 South. 581 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250 , 15 South 568 ; Larry v. Brown, 153 Ala. 452 , 44 South. 841 .

1924A question of similar character was presented in the recent case of Miller Bros. v. Direct Lumber Co., 207 Ala. 338 , 92 South. 473 .

1924A question of similar character was presented in the recent case of Miller Bros. v. Direct Lumber Co., 207 Ala. 338 , 92 South. 473 .

1923Chicago, etc., Ass’n v. Fine Arts Bldg., 244 Ill. 532 , 91 N. E. 665 , 18 Ann.

1923Chicago, etc., Ass’n v. Fine Arts Bldg., 244 Ill. 532 , 91 N. E. 665 , 18 Ann.

1922Smith v. Bachus, 195 Ala. 12 , 70 South. 261 .

1921Co. v. Prestwood, 116 Ala. 119 , 22 South. 262 , Salmon v. Wynn, 157 Ala. 112 , 47 South. 233 , and Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Milbra, 173 Ala. 658 , 55 South. 890 , merely recognize the well-understood rule that, where the jurisdiction of a court and the right of the parties to prosecute the suit have once attached, that right. cannot be arrested or taken away by proceedings in other courts.

1921Co. v. Prestwood, 116 Ala. 119 , 22 South. 262 , Salmon v. Wynn, 157 Ala. 112 , 47 South. 233 , and Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Milbra, 173 Ala. 658 , 55 South. 890 , merely recognize the well-understood rule that, where the jurisdiction of a court and the right of the parties to prosecute the suit have once attached, that right. cannot be arrested or taken away by proceedings in other courts.

1921Co. v. Prestwood, 116 Ala. 119 , 22 South. 262 , Salmon v. Wynn, 157 Ala. 112 , 47 South. 233 , and Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Milbra, 173 Ala. 658 , 55 South. 890 , merely recognize the well-understood rule that, where the jurisdiction of a court and the right of the parties to prosecute the suit have once attached, that right. cannot be arrested or taken away by proceedings in other courts.

1921Co. v. Prestwood, 116 Ala. 119 , 22 South. 262 , Salmon v. Wynn, 157 Ala. 112 , 47 South. 233 , and Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Milbra, 173 Ala. 658 , 55 South. 890 , merely recognize the well-understood rule that, where the jurisdiction of a court and the right of the parties to prosecute the suit have once attached, that right. cannot be arrested or taken away by proceedings in other courts.

1921Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152 , 74 South. 62 , and authorities there cited. [2] The testimony in this record has been most carefully read and examined.

1921Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152 , 74 South. 62 , and authorities there cited. [2] The testimony in this record has been most carefully read and examined.

1921Co. v. Prestwood, 116 Ala. 119 , 22 South. 262 , Salmon v. Wynn, 157 Ala. 112 , 47 South. 233 , and Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Milbra, 173 Ala. 658 , 55 South. 890 , merely recognize the well-understood rule that, where the jurisdiction of a court and the right of the parties to prosecute the suit have once attached, that right. cannot be arrested or taken away by proceedings in other courts.

1917It was so determined, and this principle given full application by this court in the recent case of Holt v. Givens, 72 South. 257 . 1 Conceding, therefore, for the purpose of this case, and without deciding the same, that pleas 3 and 5 were subject to the demurrer, yet, if error there was, it was clearly without injury, and no reversal of the cause could be predicated thereon.

1914We will not here discuss the evidence, but content ourselves with the statement of our conclusion that, under the well-understood rule announced in Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630 , 9 South. 738 , and subsequently followed by a number of our decisions, we do not feel authorized to disturb the ruling of the trial court upon the motion for a new trial. (2) Charge 5 states no incorrect proposition, and the giving of this charge is not reversible error. (3) Charge 3 is criticized upon the ground that the duebill itself authorized the plaintiff to collect the rents, while the charge permitted the jury