Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2010The evaluation of a Batson challenge involves a three-step process: (1) the opponent of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination; (2) the proponent of the strike must then provide a race-neutral explanation for the strike; and (3) the court must decide whether the opponent of the strike has proven discriminatory intent. [Cit.] Thomas v. State, 214 Ga. 156, 161 (5) ( 549 SE2d 359 ) (2001). 2008The evaluation of a Batson challenge involves a three-step process: (1) the opponent of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination; (2) the proponent of the strike must then provide a race-neutral explanation for the strike; and (3) the court must decide whether the opponent of the strike has proven discriminatory intent. [Cit.] Thomas v. State, 274 Ga. 156, 161 (5) ( 549 SE2d 359 ) (2001). | 8 | 9 |
Chandler v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Thomas v. State, 274 Ga. 156, 161 ( 549 SE2d 359 ) (2001); Chandler v. State, 266 Ga. 509, 510 ( 467 SE2d 562 ) (1996). 2005Thomas v. State, 274 Ga. 156, 161 ( 549 SE2d 359 ) (2001); Chandler v. State, 266 Ga. 509, 510 ( 467 SE2d 562 ) (1996). | 2 | 2 |
Kimble v. Stategreen2 sentences2012(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Kimble v. State, 301 Ga. App. 237, 245 (6) ( 687 SE2d 242 ) (2009). 2012(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Kimble v. State, 301 Ga. App. 237, 245 (6) ( 687 SE2d 242 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Blackshear v. Stategreen2 sentences2012The appeal was docketed to the April 2012 term of this Court and was submitted for a decision on briefs. 2 The evaluation of a Batson challenge involves a three-step process: (1) the opponent of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination; (2) the proponent of the strike must then provide a race-neutral explanation for the strike; and (3) the court must decide whether the opponent of the strike has proven discriminatory intent. [Cit.] Blackshear v. State, 285 Ga. 619, 620 ( 680 SE2d 850 ) (2009). 2012The appeal was docketed to the April 2012 term of this Court and was submitted for a decision on briefs. 2 The evaluation of a Batson challenge involves a three-step process: (1) the opponent of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination; (2) the proponent of the strike must then provide a race-neutral explanation for the strike; and (3) the court must decide whether the opponent of the strike has proven discriminatory intent. [Cit.] Blackshear v. State, 285 Ga. 619, 620 ( 680 SE2d 850 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Ayers v. Stategreen1 sentence2010The evaluation of a Batson challenge involves a three-step process: (1) the opponent of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie showing of racial discrimination; (2) the proponent of the strike must then provide a race-neutral explanation for the strike; and (3) the court must decide whether the opponent of the strike has proven discriminatory intent. [Cit.] Thomas v. State, 214 Ga. 156, 161 (5) ( 549 SE2d 359 ) (2001). | 1 | 1 |
Ludy v. Stategreen2 sentences2009(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ludy v. State, 283 Ga. 322, 324 (2) ( 658 SE2d 745 ) (2008). 2009(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ludy v. State, 283 Ga. 322, 324 (2) ( 658 SE2d 745 ) (2008). | 1 | 1 |
Flanders v. Stategreen2 sentences2009(Citation omitted.) Flanders v. State, 279 Ga. 35, 37 (2) ( 609 SE2d 346 ) (2005). 2009(Citation omitted.) Flanders v. State, 279 Ga. 35, 37 (2) ( 609 SE2d 346 ) (2005). | 1 | 1 |
McCastle v. Stategreen2 sentences2006(Citations omitted.) McCastle v. State, 276 Ga. App. 218, 219 (1) ( 622 SE2d 896 ) (2005). 2006(Citations omitted.) McCastle v. State, 276 Ga. App. 218, 219 (1) ( 622 SE2d 896 ) (2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.