Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sullivan v. Edward Hospitalgreen2 sentences2008Petryshyn objected, arguing that Priver’s testimony concerning the nursing standard of care — testimony that she elicited on direct examination in the evidence deposition — was inadmissible under the decision of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 209 Ill. 2d 100, 119 , 806 N.E.2d 645, 657 (2004). 2008Petryshyn objected, arguing that Priver’s testimony concerning the nursing standard of care — testimony that she elicited on direct examination in the evidence deposition — was inadmissible under the decision of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 209 Ill. 2d 100, 119 , 806 N.E.2d 645, 657 (2004). | 5 | 6 |
Paris v. MICHAEL KREITZ JR., PAgreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., Paris v. Kreitz, 75 N.C. 2004See, e.g., Paris v. Kreitz, 75 N.C.App. 365, 380 , 331 S.E.2d 234, 245 (1985) (noting that "physicians are clearly acceptable experts with regard to * * * nurses"); Goff v. Doctors General Hospital, 166 Cal.App.2d 314, 319-20 , 333 P.2d 29, 33 (1958) (reasoning that "surely, a qualified doctor would know what was standard procedure for nurses to follow"). | 3 | 3 |
WINGO BY WINGO v. Rockford Memorial Hosp.green2 sentences2004App. 3d 896, 904-07 , 686 N.E.2d 722 (1997), to support his argument that his experts were competent to testify as to the applicable nursing standard of care. 2004Accordingly, we hold that no error occurred in allowing the doctors to testify as to the applicable nursing standard of care in this case.” (Emphasis added.) Wingo, 292 Ill. | 2 | 7 |
Goff v. Doctors General Hospitalgreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., Paris v. Kreitz, 75 N.C.App. 365, 380 , 331 S.E.2d 234, 245 (1985) (noting that "physicians are clearly acceptable experts with regard to * * * nurses"); Goff v. Doctors General Hospital, 166 Cal.App.2d 314, 319-20 , 333 P.2d 29, 33 (1958) (reasoning that "surely, a qualified doctor would know what was standard procedure for nurses to follow"). 2004See, e.g., Paris v. Kreitz, 75 N.C.App. 365, 380 , 331 S.E.2d 234, 245 (1985) (noting that "physicians are clearly acceptable experts with regard to * * * nurses"); Goff v. Doctors General Hospital, 166 Cal.App.2d 314, 319-20 , 333 P.2d 29, 33 (1958) (reasoning that "surely, a qualified doctor would know what was standard procedure for nurses to follow"). | 1 | 1 |
Holston v. Sisters of Third Order of St. Francisgreen1 sentence1997Francis, 165 Ill. 2d 150, 162 (1995) (doctor testified that nurses failed to conform to nursing standard of care where nurses failed to notify doctor of patient’s condition); Glassman v. St. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Garley v. Columbia LaGrange Memorial Hospital
green
2 sentences2008App. 3d 398 , 813 N.E.2d 1030 (2004), the court had erred by permitting the jury to hear the portion of Priver’s testimony regarding the nursing standard of care. 2008Following an August 2007 hearing on Petryshyn's motion, the court granted the motion for a new trial, concluding that, based upon the authority of Garley v. Columbia LaGrange Memorial Hospital, 351 Ill.App.3d 398 , 286 Ill.Dec. 337 , 813 N.E.2d 1030 (2004), the court had erred by permitting the jury to hear the portion of Priver's testimony regarding the nursing standard of care. | 4 | 2007–2008 |
Collins v. Straka
neutral
2 sentences2002Defendants cite Collins v. Straka , 164 Ill. 2002Defendants cite Collins v. Straka, 164 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Solis v. BASF Corp.
green
1 sentence2019Rather, Pignatiello’s testimony provided ample evidence concerning the standard of care applicable to the nurses at Clare Oaks and the ways in which they deviated from the standard. ¶ 91 Finally, Clare Oaks argues that “Dr. Bigol’s counsel violated the prohibition against evidence of subsequent remedial measures by driving home the point that Clare Oaks now uses a Coumadin flowsheet, despite the trial court sustaining two objections on the subject.” See Solis v. BASF Corp., 2012 IL App (1st) 110875, ¶ 76 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.