15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dockery v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Dockery v. State, 644 N.E.2d 573, 577 (Ind. 1994). 2014Dockery v. State, 644 N.E.2d 573, 577 (Ind.1994). | 2 | 2 |
Mariscal v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Mariscal v. State, 687 N.E.2d 378, 381 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), trans. denied. 2002Mariscal v. State, 687 N.E.2d 378, 381 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), trans. denied. | 2 | 2 |
Milam v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Milam v. State, 719 N.E.2d 1208, 1210 (Ind. 1999). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Id. [80] In addition, the Indiana Supreme Court has determined, “Self defense is established if a defendant: (1) was in a place where the defendant had a right to be; (2) did not provoke, instigate, or participate willingly in the violence; and (3) had a reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm.” Brown v. State, 738 N.E.2d 271, 273 (Ind. 2000). [81] Once a defendant asserts a claim of self-defense, the State must prove that the defendant’s use of force was unjustified. | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Brattain v. State, 777 N.E.2d 774, 776 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002); Thompson v. State, 761 N.E.2d 467, 471 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Brattain v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Brattain v. State, 777 N.E.2d 774, 776 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002); Thompson v. State, 761 N.E.2d 467, 471 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Henson v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Henson v. State, 786 N.E.2d 274, 277 (Ind.2003). *109 [IB] Once the defendant asserts a claim of self-defense, the State bears the burden of disproving the existence of one of the elements of the claim. | 1 | 1 |
Brand v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Brand v. State, 766 N.E.2d 772, 780, 781 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Birdsong v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Roach v. State, 695 N.E.2d 934, 941 (Ind.1998); Birdsong v. State, 685 N.E.2d 42, 45 (Ind.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Roach v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Roach v. State, 695 N.E.2d 934, 941 (Ind.1998); Birdsong v. State, 685 N.E.2d 42, 45 (Ind.1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Herbert Quinn v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Childers v. State
green
1 sentence2016Instead, he contends that he received ineffective assistance from his probation revocation counsel. [23] In Childers v. State, 656 N.E.2d 514 (Ind.Ct.App.1995), our Court addressed the standard to be applied when a defendant asserts a claim that his probation revocation counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel during the revocation hearing. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Martin v. State
green
1 sentence1997Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Francis v. Franklin
green
2 sentences1992Instruction on Flight The defendant asserts that an instruction given on flight created a presumption of guilt upon proof of flight and shifted the burden of proof in violation of Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 LEd.2d 344, and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 LEd.2d 39. 1992Instruction on Flight The defendant asserts that an instruction given on flight created a presumption of guilt upon proof of flight and shifted the burden of proof in violation of Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 LEd.2d 344, and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 LEd.2d 39. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1992Instruction on Flight The defendant asserts that an instruction given on flight created a presumption of guilt upon proof of flight and shifted the burden of proof in violation of Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 LEd.2d 344, and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 LEd.2d 39. 1992Instruction on Flight The defendant asserts that an instruction given on flight created a presumption of guilt upon proof of flight and shifted the burden of proof in violation of Francis v. Franklin (1985), 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S.Ct. 1965 , 85 LEd.2d 344, and Sandstrom v. Montana (1979), 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 , 61 LEd.2d 39. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Rogers v. State
green
2 sentences1991Rogers v. State (1987), Ind., 514 N.E.2d 1259 ; Wood v. State (1987), Ind., 512 N.E.2d 1094 . 1991Rogers v. State (1987), Ind., 514 N.E.2d 1259 ; Wood v. State (1987), Ind., 512 N.E.2d 1094 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Wood v. State
green
2 sentences1991Rogers v. State (1987), Ind., 514 N.E.2d 1259 ; Wood v. State (1987), Ind., 512 N.E.2d 1094 . 1991Rogers v. State (1987), Ind., 514 N.E.2d 1259 ; Wood v. State (1987), Ind., 512 N.E.2d 1094 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Simmons v. United States
green
2 sentences1984The defendant asserts that the instruction is a proper one to give in that it quotes the U.S. Supreme Court in Simmons v. United States, (1968) 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 . 1984The defendant asserts that the instruction is a proper one to give in that it quotes the U.S. Supreme Court in Simmons v. United States, (1968) 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Strode v. State
neutral
1 sentence1984Strode v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 400 N.E.2d 183 ; Griffin v. State, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 469 , 372 N.E.2d 497 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Griffin v. State
green
2 sentences1984Strode v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 400 N.E.2d 183 ; Griffin v. State, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 469 , 372 N.E.2d 497 . 1984Strode v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 400 N.E.2d 183 ; Griffin v. State, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 469 , 372 N.E.2d 497 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.