Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jacksongreen2 sentences1998The issue of an illegally lenient sentence has been previously addressed by this court in State v. Hines, 95-111 (La.App. 8 Cir. 10/4/95); 668 So.2d 199, 201 , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984), and resolved as follows: [W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought the appellate review. 1995In State v. Stein, 611 So.2d 800 at 801 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), this court, quoting the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984), stated: [W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought the appellate review. | 3 | 15 |
State v. Steingreen2 sentences1998State v. Hines, 95-111 p. 3 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/4/95); 663 So.2d 199, 201 , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Stein, 611 So.2d 800, 801 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/92) and State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984). 1995In State v. Stein, 611 So.2d 800 at 801 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), this court, quoting the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984), stated: [W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought the appellate review. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hines
neutral
2 sentences1998State v. Hines, 95-111 p. 3 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/4/95); 663 So.2d 199, 201 , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Stein, 611 So.2d 800, 801 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/92) and State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984). 1998The issue of an illegally lenient sentence has been previously addressed by this court in State v. Hines, 95-111 (La.App. 8 Cir. 10/4/95); 668 So.2d 199, 201 , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984), and resolved as follows: [W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought the appellate review. | 4 | 1997–1998 |
State v. Hines
neutral
2 sentences1998State v. Hines, 95-111 p. 3 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/4/95); 663 So.2d 199, 201 , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Stein, 611 So.2d 800, 801 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/22/92) and State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984). 1998State v. Hines, 95-111 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; 663 So.2d 199 , 201 writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); 667 So.2d 528 , citing State v. Jackson, 452 So.2d 682 (La.1984). | 3 | 1997–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.