Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Schaffnergreen2 sentences1998“The granting of a hardship driving privilege during the period of revocation is a matter of grace and there is no vested right to receive it.” Williams v. Schaffner, 477 S.W.2d 55, 57 (Mo. banc 1972). 1993Williams v. Schaffner, 477 S.W.2d 55, 57 [1, 2] (Mo. banc 1972). | 5 | 5 |
Hardwick v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence1989In Hardwick v. Director of Revenue, 760 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Mo.App.1988), this court stated that the court had no jurisdiction to grant a hardship privilege when there were two DWI convictions within a five year period. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hagan v. Director of Revenue
green
2 sentences2012"If anything, the greater public good is served by liberally interpreting the hardship driving privilege statute in favor of keeping multiple offenders off the road.” Hagan, 968 S.W.2d at 706 . 2004“If anything, the greater public good is served by liberally interpreting the hardship driving privilege statute in favor of keeping multiple offenders off the road.” Id. | 4 | 1999–2013 |
Zitzman v. Lohman
green
1 sentence2013Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Beach v. Director of Revenue
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Weir v. Director of Revenue
green
1 sentence1990The court, relying in part on Weir v. Director of Revenue, 750 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App.1988), ruled, “a judgment granting a hardship driving privilege is final thirty days after entry of the judgment.” Id. at 26. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Eccarius v. Director of Revenue
green
2 sentences1990Upon application accompanied by a copy of the applicant's driving record for the next preceding five years as certified by the Director and proof of financial responsibility, the trial court may grant the hardship driving privilege subject to certain qualifications and prohibitions. § 302.309.3; Eccarius, 774 S.W.2d at 575-76 . 1990Upon application accompanied by a copy of the applicant’s driving record for the next preceding five years as certified by the Director and proof of financial responsibility, the trial court may grant the hardship driving privilege subject to certain qualifications and prohibitions. § 302.309.3; Eccarius, 774 S.W.2d at 575-76 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Robinson v. Director of Revenue
green
2 sentences1989In Robinson the trial court granted a hardship driving privilege for one year beginning July 30, 1985. 762 S.W.2d at 873 . 1989Id. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.
green
2 sentences1972All who bring themselves by their actions into the group who are not entitled to a hardship driving privilege are subject to the same conditions, and are not denied equal protection of the law, State v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 362 Mo. 299 , 240 S.W.2d 886 , nor does the group constitute an unreasonable or capricious classification contrary to constitutional standards. 1972All who bring themselves by their actions into the group who are not entitled to a hardship driving privilege are subject to the same conditions, and are not denied equal protection of the law, State v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 362 Mo. 299 , 240 S.W.2d 886 , nor does the group constitute an unreasonable or capricious classification contrary to constitutional standards. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.