Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hardygreen2 sentences2025App. 146, 160 , 774 S.E.2d 410, 420 (2015) (“When the trial court consolidates multiple convictions into a single judgment but one of the convictions was entered in error, the proper remedy is to remand for resentencing when the appellate courts ‘are unable to determine what weight, if any, the trial court gave each of the separate convictions . . . in calculating the sentences imposed upon the defendant.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Moore, 327 N.C. 378, 383 , 395 S.E.2d 124, 127-28 (1990)). 2023“When the trial court consolidates multiple convictions into a single judgment but one of the convictions was entered in error, the proper remedy is to remand for resentencing[.]” State v. Hardy, 242 N.C. | 8 | 11 |
State v. Mooregreen2 sentences2026When the trial court consolidates multiple convictions into a single judgment, but one of the convictions was entered in error, the proper remedy is to remand for resentencing when this Court is “unable to determine what weight, if any, the trial court gave each of the separate convictions . . . in calculating the sentences imposed upon the defendant.” State v. Moore, 327 N.C. 378, 383 (1990). 2025App. 146, 160 , 774 S.E.2d 410, 420 (2015) (“When the trial court consolidates multiple convictions into a single judgment but one of the convictions was entered in error, the proper remedy is to remand for resentencing when the appellate courts ‘are unable to determine what weight, if any, the trial court gave each of the separate convictions . . . in calculating the sentences imposed upon the defendant.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Moore, 327 N.C. 378, 383 , 395 S.E.2d 124, 127-28 (1990)). | 4 | 6 |
State v. Cromartiegreen2 sentences2023However, “[w]hen the trial court consolidates multiple convictions into a single judgment but one of the convictions was entered in error, the proper remedy is to remand for resentencing[,]” but only where this Court is “unable to determine what weight, if any, the trial court gave to each of the separate convictions[.]” State v. Cromartie, 257 N.C. 2023App. 790, 797 , 810 S.E.2d 766, 772 (2018) (internal marks and citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2023App. 146, 160 (2015) (quoting State v. Moore, 327 N.C. 378, 383 (1990)) (emphasis added); see also State v. Jones, 265 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.