Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dawn M. v. New York State Central Register of Child Abuse & Maltreatmentgreen2 sentences2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. 2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. | 4 | 5 |
300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rightsgreen2 sentences2012Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). 2012Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). | 3 | 4 |
Cheryl Z. v. Carriongreen2 sentences2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. 2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. | 3 | 3 |
Ojofeitimi v. New York State Office of Children & Family Servicesgreen2 sentences2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. 2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. | 2 | 3 |
Archer v. Carriongreen2 sentences2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. 2017Thus, the Administrative Law Judge’s “determination that [OCFS] established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject child[ ] and that such maltreatment was relevant and reasonably related to childcare employment is supported by substantial evidence” (Dawn M., 138 AD3d at 1494; see generally Matter of Cheryl Z. v Carrion, 119 AD3d 1109, 1111 [2014]; Matter of Archer v Carrion, 117 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2014]; Matter of Ojofeitimi v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 89 AD3d 854, 855 [2011]; Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. | 2 | 3 |
Zurheide v. S-C Associates, L.P.green2 sentences2017Dept. of Social Servs., 248 AD2d 380, 382 [1998]). 2017Dept. of Social Servs., 248 AD2d 380, 382 [1998]). | 2 | 3 |
Castilloux v. New York State Office of Children & Family Servicesgreen2 sentences2012We conclude, therefore, that respondent’s determination that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the child based on excessive corporal punishment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Castilloux v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 16 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). 2012We conclude, therefore, that respondent’s determination that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the child based on excessive corporal punishment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Castilloux v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 16 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). | 2 | 3 |
In re the Claim of Santiagogreen2 sentences2012Contrary to the further contention of petitioner, the Administrative Law Judge’s refusal to grant certain subpoenas did not deprive him of the right to a fair hearing because the subpoenas would have resulted in the introduction of irrelevant or duplicative evidence (see generally Matter of Flynn v Hevesi, 308 AD2d 674, 676 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 504 [2003]). 2012Contrary to the further contention of petitioner, the Administrative Law Judge’s refusal to grant certain subpoenas did not deprive him of the right to a fair hearing because the subpoenas would have resulted in the introduction of irrelevant or duplicative evidence (see generally Matter of Flynn v Hevesi, 308 AD2d 674, 676 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 504 [2003]). | 2 | 3 |
Godfrey v. Shahgreen2 sentences2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946). 2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295 ; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125 ; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946 ). | 1 | 1 |
Layer v. Novellogreen2 sentences2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946). 2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295 ; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125 ; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946 ). | 1 | 1 |
Sorrentino v. Novellogreen2 sentences2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946). 2026In sum, the evidence at the fair hearing unequivocally showed that the Convaid Cruiser stroller was medically necessary, as, among other things, it would reduce the petitioner's physical disability, restore him to his best possible functional level, and improve his capacity for normal activity ( see Matter of Godfrey v Shah , 91 AD3d 1294, 1295 ; Matter of Layer v Novello , 17 AD3d 1123, 1125 ; Matter of Sorrentino v Novello , 295 AD2d 945, 946 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hattie G. v. Monroe County Department of Social Services, Children's Services Unit
green
2 sentences2012We conclude on the record before us that the determi nation that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject children is supported by substantial evidence (see Mangus, 68 AD3d at 1775 ; cf. Hattie G., 48 AD3d at 1293 ; see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. 2012We conclude on the record before us that the determi nation that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject children is supported by substantial evidence (see Mangus, 68 AD3d at 1775 ; cf. Hattie G., 48 AD3d at 1293 ; see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. | 4 | 2009–2012 |
Mangus v. Niagara County Department of Social Services
green
2 sentences2012We conclude on the record before us that the determi nation that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject children is supported by substantial evidence (see Mangus, 68 AD3d at 1775 ; cf. Hattie G., 48 AD3d at 1293 ; see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. 2012We conclude on the record before us that the determi nation that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the subject children is supported by substantial evidence (see Mangus, 68 AD3d at 1775 ; cf. Hattie G., 48 AD3d at 1293 ; see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. | 3 | 2012–2012 |
Secco Elec. Corp. v. Kalikow
green
2 sentences2012We conclude, therefore, that respondent’s determination that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the child based on excessive corporal punishment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Castilloux v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 16 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). 2012We conclude, therefore, that respondent’s determination that DSS established by a fair preponderance of the evidence at the fair hearing that petitioner maltreated the child based on excessive corporal punishment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Castilloux v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 16 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). | 3 | 2012–2012 |
Bradford v. Blum
neutral
1 sentence1984We find that the evidence at the fair hearing, which established, at worst, that petitioner was slow and disruptive on the job, was not sufficient to justify the inference that petitioner willfully failed or refused to accept manpower services (see 18 NYCRR 385.7 [a] [2] [v]; 385.8 [b]; Matter of Bradford v Blum, 91 AD2d 550 ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Carlin v. Blum
neutral
1 sentence1980In our opinion, the evidence at the fair hearing was sufficient to permit recoupment only as to the first of the alleged frauds, and only to the extent that it would not deprive petitioner’s minor children of assistance which they are entitled to receive (Matter of Carlin v Blum, 72 AD2d 561 ). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.