Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Von Moltke v. Gillies
green
2 sentences2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. 2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. | 15 | 1993–2024 |
State v. Gibson
green
2 sentences2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. 2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. | 6 | 1993–2024 |
State v. Ebersole
green
2 sentences2018State v. Ebersole, 107 Ohio App.3d 288, 293 , 668 N.E.2d 934 (3rd Dist.1995), citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). {¶ 17} In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00219 6 To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, th 2018State v. Ebersole, 107 Ohio App.3d 288, 293 , 668 N.E.2d 934 (3rd Dist.1995), citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). {¶ 17} In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00219 6 To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, th | 6 | 2013–2018 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2018State v. Ebersole, 107 Ohio App.3d 288, 293 , 668 N.E.2d 934 (3rd Dist.1995), citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). {¶ 17} In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00219 6 To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, th 2018State v. Ebersole, 107 Ohio App.3d 288, 293 , 668 N.E.2d 934 (3rd Dist.1995), citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). {¶ 17} In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: Stark County, Case No. 2017CA00219 6 To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, th | 4 | 2013–2018 |
Carnley v. Cochran
green
2 sentences2020Id., citing Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 , 82 S.Ct. 884, 890 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962). {¶11} This Court has previously discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, 2020Id., citing Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 , 82 S.Ct. 884, 890 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962). {¶11} This Court has previously discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, | 2 | 2020–2020 |
City of Garfield Heights v. Brewer
green
2 sentences2020Id., citing Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 , 82 S.Ct. 884, 890 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962). {¶11} This Court has previously discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, 2020Id., citing Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 , 82 S.Ct. 884, 890 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962). {¶9} This Court has previously discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: Richland County, Case No. 2020 CA 0006 5 In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the s | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. 2024State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St.3d 210 , 2006-Ohio-6404 , 858 N.E.2d 1144, ¶ 101 . {¶23} The Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d 366, 377 , 345 N.E.2d 399 (1976), applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 (1948) to establish whether the trial court made a sufficient pretrial inquiry with respect to a waiver of counsel. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Newman
green
1 sentence2022Stark No. 2017CA00219, 2018-Ohio-3253, at ¶ 17-18 , this Court discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: [Cite as State v. Meyer, 2022-Ohio-1226 .] In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, the range of allowa | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Meyer
neutral
1 sentence2022Stark No. 2017CA00219, 2018-Ohio-3253, at ¶ 17-18 , this Court discussed what must appear in the record to demonstrate a valid waiver of counsel: [Cite as State v. Meyer, 2022-Ohio-1226 .] In Gibson, supra, the Ohio Supreme Court applied the test set forth in Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948), which established the requirements for a sufficient pretrial inquiry by the trial court into a waiver of counsel: To be valid such waiver must be made with an apprehension of the nature of the charges, the statutory offenses included within them, the range of allowa | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Overholt
green
2 sentences1993The Ohio Supreme Court specifically noted, in Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d at 376-377 , 74 O.O.2d at 530-532 , 345 N.E.2d at 405-406 , that the Von Moltke standard was applicable, as did the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in State v. Doane (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 638, 647 , 591 N.E.2d 735, 741 , and the Third District Court of Appeals in State v. Overholt (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 111, 117 , 601 N.E.2d 116, 119 . 1993The Ohio Supreme Court specifically noted, in Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d at 376-377 , 74 O.O.2d at 530-532 , 345 N.E.2d at 405-406 , that the Von Moltke standard was applicable, as did the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in State v. Doane (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 638, 647 , 591 N.E.2d 735, 741 , and the Third District Court of Appeals in State v. Overholt (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 111, 117 , 601 N.E.2d 116, 119 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Doane
green
2 sentences1993The Ohio Supreme Court specifically noted, in Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d at 376-377 , 74 O.O.2d at 530-532 , 345 N.E.2d at 405-406 , that the Von Moltke standard was applicable, as did the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in State v. Doane (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 638, 647 , 591 N.E.2d 735, 741 , and the Third District Court of Appeals in State v. Overholt (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 111, 117 , 601 N.E.2d 116, 119 . 1993The Ohio Supreme Court specifically noted, in Gibson, 45 Ohio St.2d at 376-377 , 74 O.O.2d at 530-532 , 345 N.E.2d at 405-406 , that the Von Moltke standard was applicable, as did the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in State v. Doane (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 638, 647 , 591 N.E.2d 735, 741 , and the Third District Court of Appeals in State v. Overholt (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 111, 117 , 601 N.E.2d 116, 119 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.