Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McFarlandgreen2 sentences2025State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 338 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 12 No. 40152-9-III State v. Butler NO VIOLATION OF BUTLER’S RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT Butler argues the State violated his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent by arguing negative inferences from Bailon’s unwillingness to talk with the detective, or as Butler terms it, Bailon’s “silence.” We disagree. 2018See McFarland, 127 Wn.2d at 334 . 9 No. 49757-3-II Therefore, because Hayes fails to show a manifest error affecting a constitutional right under RAP 2.5(a), his SAG claim fails. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bluehorse
green
2 sentences2024Bluehorse, 159 Wn. 2024Bluehorse, 159 Wn. | 5 | 2017–2024 |
State v. Alvarado
green
2 sentences2024State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot 25 No. 57561-2-II review” claims that rely on evidence outside the appellate record).7 McCoshum’s prosecutorial misconduct SAG claim fails. 2023State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot review” claims that rely on evidence outside of the appellate record). 9 No. 57405-5-II McIntosh’s second SAG claim states, “Mental health diagnosis coupled with violent history.” SAG at 1. | 2 | 2023–2024 |
State v. Alvarado
green
2 sentences2024State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot 25 No. 57561-2-II review” claims that rely on evidence outside the appellate record).7 McCoshum’s prosecutorial misconduct SAG claim fails. 2023State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot review” claims that rely on evidence outside of the appellate record). 9 No. 57405-5-II McIntosh’s second SAG claim states, “Mental health diagnosis coupled with violent history.” SAG at 1. | 2 | 2023–2024 |
State v. Afeworki
neutral
2 sentences2024There no right to counsel for purposes of filing a claim for money damages against counsel or others as a result of a criminal conviction. “‘[T]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel, while fundamental, is not a right without limitation.’” State v. Afeworki, 189 Wn. 2024There no right to counsel for purposes of filing a claim for money damages against counsel or others as a result of a criminal conviction. “‘[T]he Sixth Amendment right to counsel, while fundamental, is not a right without limitation.’” State v. Afeworki, 189 Wn. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State Of Washington v. Anthony Gene Hand
green
2 sentences2025State v. Hand, 199 Wn. 2025State v. Hand, 199 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Norman
green
2 sentences2021App. 16, 27-28 , 808 P.2d 1159 (1991). 2 No. 37011-9-III State v. Bockman The other SAG challenge alleges that the case was filed at the Benton County Justice Center in Kennewick instead of at the county courthouse in Prosser. 2021App. 16, 27-28 , 808 P.2d 1159 (1991). 2 No. 37011-9-III State v. Bockman The other SAG challenge alleges that the case was filed at the Benton County Justice Center in Kennewick instead of at the county courthouse in Prosser. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. O'Connor
green
2 sentences2019State v. O’Connor, 155 Wn. 2019State v. O’Connor, 155 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Boogaard
green
1 sentence2015Because appellate counsel addressed this issue in his supplemental brief, we do not separately address Proshold' s SAG claim on this ground. 45736 -9 -II in telling jury it needed to return a verdict by a certain time); Boogaard, 90 Wn.2d at 739 -40 trial court impermissibly suggested that jury needed to return a verdict within a half hour. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.