Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
JIMMY SMITH v. STATE OF ARKANSASgreen1 sentence2020Swanigan v. State, 2019 Ark. 294 , 586 S.W.3d 137 ; see also Smith v. State, 2018 Ark. 396 , 562 S.W.3d 2 Although Barnett makes a conclusory claim that Black received favorable treatment in exchange for his testimony, Barnett offers no evidence to support his claim, and a court considering a claim of a Brady violation in a coram nobis petition is not required to take a petitioner’s allegations at face value without substantiation—which Barnett fails to provide. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Jones v. State, 2014 Ark. 448, at 6-7 , 486 S.W.3d 743, 748 (per curiam) (“The burden is entirely on the claimant to provide facts that affirmatively support his or her claims of prejudice; neither conclusory statements nor allegations without factual substantiation are sufficient to overcome the presumption that counsel was effective.”); see also Detherow v. State, 2015 Ark. 447, at 5 , 476 S.W.3d 155, 159 (per curiam). 2017See Jones v. State, 2014 Ark. 448, at 6-7 , 486 S.W.3d 743, 748 (per curiam) (“The burden is entirely on the claimant to provide facts that affirmatively support his or her claims of prejudice; neither conclusory statements nor allegations without factual substantiation are sufficient to overcome the presumption that counsel was effective.”); see also Detherow v. State, 2015 Ark. 447, at 5 , 476 S.W.3d 155, 159 (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
Nance v. Stategreen2 sentences2017“Conclusory allegations that are unsupported by facts do not provide a basis for either.an evidentiary hearing or postconviction relief.” Nance v. State, 339 Ark. 192, 195 , 4 S.W.3d 501, 503 (1999). | ifiIn this case, Burnside has simply stated a conclusory claim that the motorcycle gang’s presence outside the courthouse created an atmosphere of prejudice. 2017“Conclusory allegations that are unsupported by facts do not provide a basis for either.an evidentiary hearing or postconviction relief.” Nance v. State, 339 Ark. 192, 195 , 4 S.W.3d 501, 503 (1999). | ifiIn this case, Burnside has simply stated a conclusory claim that the motorcycle gang’s presence outside the courthouse created an atmosphere of prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
Detherow v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Jones v. State, 2014 Ark. 448, at 6-7 , 486 S.W.3d 743, 748 (per curiam) (“The burden is entirely on the claimant to provide facts that affirmatively support his or her claims of prejudice; neither conclusory statements nor allegations without factual substantiation are sufficient to overcome the presumption that counsel was effective.”); see also Detherow v. State, 2015 Ark. 447, at 5 , 476 S.W.3d 155, 159 (per curiam). 2017See Jones v. State, 2014 Ark. 448, at 6-7 , 486 S.W.3d 743, 748 (per curiam) (“The burden is entirely on the claimant to provide facts that affirmatively support his or her claims of prejudice; neither conclusory statements nor allegations without factual substantiation are sufficient to overcome the presumption that counsel was effective.”); see also Detherow v. State, 2015 Ark. 447, at 5 , 476 S.W.3d 155, 159 (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 321 Ark. 117 , 900 S.W.2d 940 (1995). . 2010See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 321 Ark. 117 , 900 S.W.2d 940 (1995). . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ortega v. State
green
2 sentences2021Ortega v. State, 2017 Ark. 365 , 533 S.W.3d 68 . 2021Ortega v. State, 2017 Ark. 365 , 533 S.W.3d 68 . | 2 | 2020–2021 |
James Nelson Eng. v. State
neutral
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Dawson v. Delaware
green
1 sentence2022That case bars admission of a defendant’s beliefs and associations “when those beliefs have no bearing on the issue being tried.” 503 U.S. at 168 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Darrell Dennis v. State of Arkansas
green
2 sentences2022Dennis v. State, 2020 Ark. 28 , 592 S.W.3d 646 . 2022Dennis v. State, 2020 Ark. 28 , 592 S.W.3d 646 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Nicholas Addison v. State of Arkansas
neutral
2 sentences2021Addison v. State, 2020 Ark. 273 , 606 S.W.3d 73 . 2021Addison v. State, 2020 Ark. 273 , 606 S.W.3d 73 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Charles Edward Jones v. State of Arkansas
neutral
1 sentence2020Jones, 2019 Ark. 340 , 588 S.W.3d 33 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Terry Swanigan v. State of Arkansas
neutral
1 sentence2020Swanigan v. State, 2019 Ark. 294 , 586 S.W.3d 137 ; see also Smith v. State, 2018 Ark. 396 , 562 S.W.3d 2 Although Barnett makes a conclusory claim that Black received favorable treatment in exchange for his testimony, Barnett offers no evidence to support his claim, and a court considering a claim of a Brady violation in a coram nobis petition is not required to take a petitioner’s allegations at face value without substantiation—which Barnett fails to provide. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Thacker v. State
green
2 sentences2020Thacker v. State, 2016 Ark. 350 , 500 S.W.3d 736 . 2020Thacker v. State, 2016 Ark. 350 , 500 S.W.3d 736 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Green v. State
green
2 sentences2019Green v. State, 2016 Ark. 386 , 502 S.W.3d 524 . 2019Green v. State, 2016 Ark. 386 , 502 S.W.3d 524 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Munnerlyn v. State
green
1 sentence2014Munnerlyn v. State, 2013 Ark. 339 (per curiam); Glaze v. State, 2013 Ark. 141 (per curiam). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Kaestel v. State
green
1 sentence2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Gilbert
green
1 sentence2000Kaestal v. State, 274 Ark. 550 , 636 S.W.2d 940 (1982). 2 Mr. Hinkston also makes a conclusory claim that the admission of his statements might have violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.