Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Myersgreen2 sentences2017A conclusory claim that a defendant would have proceeded with trial if an error had not occurred “is not a sufficient assertion of prejudice.” State v. Myers, 653 N.W.2d 574, 579 (Iowa 2002). 2016In State v. Myers, 653 N.W.2d 574, 578 (Iowa 2002), our supreme court rejected the defendant’s “conclusory claim” that she was “ready to insist on going to trial.” Gray does not even offer such a conclusory claim. | 5 | 5 |
Dunbar v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See State v. Kendall, 167 N.W.2d 909, 911 (Iowa 1969) (stating that ineffective-assistance claims “must be supported by more than speculative, generalized argument”); see also, e.g., Dunbar v. State, 515 N.W.2d 12, 15 (Iowa 1994) (holding a PCR applicant’s claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate were “too general in nature” to address because the applicant did “not propose what an investigation would have revealed or how anything discovered would have affected the result obtained below”); Luke v. State, 465 N.W.2d 898, 902 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990) (rejecting a claim of | 1 | 1 |
Luke v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See State v. Kendall, 167 N.W.2d 909, 911 (Iowa 1969) (stating that ineffective-assistance claims “must be supported by more than speculative, generalized argument”); see also, e.g., Dunbar v. State, 515 N.W.2d 12, 15 (Iowa 1994) (holding a PCR applicant’s claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate were “too general in nature” to address because the applicant did “not propose what an investigation would have revealed or how anything discovered would have affected the result obtained below”); Luke v. State, 465 N.W.2d 898, 902 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990) (rejecting a claim of | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kendallgreen1 sentence2026See State v. Kendall, 167 N.W.2d 909, 911 (Iowa 1969) (stating that ineffective-assistance claims “must be supported by more than speculative, generalized argument”); see also, e.g., Dunbar v. State, 515 N.W.2d 12, 15 (Iowa 1994) (holding a PCR applicant’s claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate were “too general in nature” to address because the applicant did “not propose what an investigation would have revealed or how anything discovered would have affected the result obtained below”); Luke v. State, 465 N.W.2d 898, 902 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990) (rejecting a claim of | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strawgreen1 sentence2023But “a conclusory claim that she was ready to insist on going to trial [is] not a sufficient assertion of prejudice.” State v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 137 (Iowa 2006), superseded in part by statute on other grounds, 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140 §§ 28, 31 (codified at Iowa Code §§ 814.6 (1)(a), .7). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Millergreen1 sentence2019See State v. Miller, 311 N.W.2d 81 , 83–84 (Iowa 1981); State v. Ruiz, 496 N.W.2d 789, 792 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ruizgreen1 sentence2019See State v. Miller, 311 N.W.2d 81 , 83–84 (Iowa 1981); State v. Ruiz, 496 N.W.2d 789, 792 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tategreen1 sentence2014See State v. Tate, 710 N.W.2d 237, 241 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.