Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hamptongreen2 sentences1993See People v. Hampton, 746 P.2d 947 (Colo.1987). 1993See People v. Hampton, 746 P.2d 947 (Colo.1987). | 2 | 3 |
Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. RegScan, Incgreen1 sentence2025“That’s the result only if the jury ‘probably would have decided [the] case differently if given a correct instruction.’” Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. RegScan, Inc., 2018 COA 21, ¶ 46 (quoting Gasteazoro v. Cath. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Gwinngreen1 sentence2020Id.; People v. Gwinn, 2018 COA 130, ¶ 31 (“A court abuses its discretion if it bases its ruling on an erroneous view of the law . . . .”); Bryant, ¶ 87. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence2001See People v. Rodriguez, supra. VI. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Griffingreen1 sentence2001People v. Griffin, 867 P.2d 27, 33 (Colo.App.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Espinoza v. People
green
2 sentences2004People v. Stewart, supra; Espinoza v. People, 712 P.2d 476 (Colo.1985). 1996Espinoza v. People, 712 P.2d 476 (Colo.1985). | 3 | 1992–2004 |
Wilson v. People
green
2 sentences1998Wilson v. People, 743 P.2d 415 (Colo.1987); People v. Larson, 782 P.2d 840 (Colo.App.1989) (using plain error analysis in the context of instructional error). 1990Wilson v. People, supra. In the context of instructional error there is no plain error unless a review of the entire record demonstrates a reasonable possibility that the improper instruction contributed to the defendant’s conviction. | 2 | 1990–1998 |
People v. Dillon
green
2 sentences1990People v. Dillon, 655 P.2d 841 (Colo.1982). 1985People v. Dillon, 655 P.2d 841 (Colo.1982); People v. Aragon, 186 Colo. 91 , 525 P.2d 1134 (1974). | 2 | 1985–1990 |
Schuessler v. Wolter
green
1 sentence2025In the context of instructional error, “a judgment will not be reversed for refusal to give requested instructions where there was not resulting substantial, prejudicial error.” Schuessler v. Wolter, 2012 COA 86, ¶ 11 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2004People v. Garcia, 28 P.3d 340 (Colo.2001). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Stewart
green
1 sentence2004People v. Stewart, supra; Espinoza v. People, 712 P.2d 476 (Colo.1985). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Larson
green
1 sentence1998Wilson v. People, 743 P.2d 415 (Colo.1987); People v. Larson, 782 P.2d 840 (Colo.App.1989) (using plain error analysis in the context of instructional error). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Aragon
green
2 sentences1985People v. Dillon, 655 P.2d 841 (Colo.1982); People v. Aragon, 186 Colo. 91 , 525 P.2d 1134 (1974). 1985People v. Dillon, 655 P.2d 841 (Colo.1982); People v. Aragon, 186 Colo. 91 , 525 P.2d 1134 (1974). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.