Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1977–1983 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Louis v. South Broward Hospital Dist.green1 sentence1983See Louis v. South Broward Hospital District, 353 So.2d 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Click v. Pardoll, 359 So.2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 367 So.2d 1122 (Fla.1979). | 1 | 1 |
Click v. Pardollgreen1 sentence1983See Louis v. South Broward Hospital District, 353 So.2d 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Click v. Pardoll, 359 So.2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 367 So.2d 1122 (Fla.1979). | 1 | 1 |
Galuppi v. Vielegreen1 sentence1979See Gaiuppi v. Viele, 232 So.2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), in which it was held an amendment to a complaint naming the defendants in their individual capacity, rather than as a corporation, related back to the date the original complaint was filed. | 1 | 1 |
Cabot v. Clearwater Construction Companygreen2 sentences1979See Cabot v. Clearwater Construction Company, 89 So.2d 662 (Fla.1956); Argenbright v. J. 1979See Cabot v. Clearwater Construction Company, supra ( 89 So.2d at 663 ). | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Curgilgreen1 sentence1979See Young v. Curgil, 358 So.2d 58, 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aldana v. Holub
green
2 sentences1983When the mediation proceeding was terminated by operation of law pursuant to the supreme court's decision in Aldana v. Holub, 381 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1980), Cates instituted an action in the circuit court, filing a complaint on April 9, 1980. 1983When the mediation proceeding was terminated by operation of law pursuant to the supreme court’s decision in Aldana v. Holub, 381 So.2d 231 (Fla.1980), Cates instituted an action in the circuit court, filing a complaint on April 9, 1980. | 5 | 1980–1983 |
Carter v. Sparkman
green
2 sentences1979In seeking an answer to this question it must be assumed that the legislature was well aware of the court’s holding in Carter v. Sparkman, supra, that the pre-litigation burden of 768.44 was at the very limit of constitutional tolerance. 1977Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla. 1976). *626 Although requesting all the orders transferring and reinstating her medical mediation claim which delayed the progress of the mediation proceedings, the relator now claims that the ten month time limit for a final hearing on the claims established by Section 768.44(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976), has expired and the respondent has lost jurisdiction to proceed. | 2 | 1977–1979 |
Diggett v. Conkling
green
1 sentence1979The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hewitt v. Caffee
green
1 sentence1979The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Grossman v. Duncan
green
1 sentence1979The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Taylor ex rel. Taylor v. Munroe Memorial Hospital
neutral
1 sentence1979Taylor v. Munroe Memorial Hospital, 362 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Largen v. Greenfield
neutral
1 sentence1978In Largen & Clontz, et al. v. Greenfield, 363 So.2d 573 (Fla.2d DCA 1978), this court recently concluded that the venue for a medical mediation claim lay in the same forum in which the subsequent malpractice action was required to be filed. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Cole v. Wallace
neutral
1 sentence1978Cole v. Wallace, 354 So.2d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1977); Aldana v. Holub, 354 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Aldana v. Holub
green
1 sentence1978Cole v. Wallace, 354 So.2d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1977); Aldana v. Holub, 354 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.