Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2024In the absence of controlling authority establishing that any error in the jury instructions at issue was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, the appellant could not meet the second prong of the plain-error test.”); Simmons, 314 Ga. at 889-890 (2) (a) (holding that defendant failed to show clear and obvious error in jury instruction, where the instruction appeared in Georgia’s pattern jury instructions, and the defendant did not point to any authority showing that the pattern instruction was deficient); Williams v. State, 304 Ga. 455, 458-459 (3) ( 818 SE2d 653 ) (2018) (concluding that defenda 2024In the absence of controlling authority establishing that any error in the jury instructions at issue was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, the appellant could not meet the second prong of the plain-error test.”); Simmons, 314 Ga. at 889-890 (2) (a) (holding that defendant failed to show clear and obvious error in jury instruction, where the instruction appeared in Georgia’s pattern jury instructions, and the defendant did not point to any authority showing that the pattern instruction was deficient); Williams v. State, 304 Ga. 455, 458-459 (3) ( 818 SE2d 653 ) (2018) (concluding that defenda | 2 | 2 |
Simmons v. Stategreen1 sentence2024In the absence of controlling authority establishing that any error in the jury instructions at issue was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, the appellant could not meet the second prong of the plain-error test.”); Simmons, 314 Ga. at 889-890 (2) (a) (holding that defendant failed to show clear and obvious error in jury instruction, where the instruction appeared in Georgia’s pattern jury instructions, and the defendant did not point to any authority showing that the pattern instruction was deficient); Williams v. State, 304 Ga. 455, 458-459 (3) ( 818 SE2d 653 ) (2018) (concluding that defenda | 1 | 1 |
MUSE v. THE STATE (Three Cases)green2 sentences2024See also Muse v. State, 316 Ga. 639, 667 (9) (b) ( 889 SE2d 885 ) (2023) (“As to the second part of the plain error test, an error is plain if it is clear or obvious under current law. 2024See also Muse v. State, 316 Ga. 639, 667 (9) (b) ( 889 SE2d 885 ) (2023) (“As to the second part of the plain error test, an error is plain if it is clear or obvious under current law. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2024In the absence of controlling authority establishing that any error in the jury instructions at issue was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, the appellant could not meet the second prong of the plain-error test.”); Simmons, 314 Ga. at 889-890 (2) (a) (holding that defendant failed to show clear and obvious error in jury instruction, where the instruction appeared in Georgia’s pattern jury instructions, and the defendant did not point to any authority showing that the pattern instruction was deficient); Williams v. State, 304 Ga. 455, 458-459 (3) ( 818 SE2d 653 ) (2018) (concluding that defenda 2024In the absence of controlling authority establishing that any error in the jury instructions at issue was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, the appellant could not meet the second prong of the plain-error test.”); Simmons, 314 Ga. at 889-890 (2) (a) (holding that defendant failed to show clear and obvious error in jury instruction, where the instruction appeared in Georgia’s pattern jury instructions, and the defendant did not point to any authority showing that the pattern instruction was deficient); Williams v. State, 304 Ga. 455, 458-459 (3) ( 818 SE2d 653 ) (2018) (concluding that defenda | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Jackson v. State, 305 Ga. 614, 620-621 ( 825 SE2d 188 ) (2019) (holding that there was no clear error in giving pattern charge on defendant’s good character without additional language stating that “good character is a substantive fact which itself creates reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s 3 The suggested pattern jury instruction states as follows: You have heard evidence of the (character of the defendant) (character of the defendant for a particular trait, more specifically __________) in an effort to show that the defendant likely acted in keeping with such character or trait at pertin | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2020Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-696 ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984); Wesley v. State, 286 Ga. 355, 356 ( 689 SE2d 280 ) (2010). 2020Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-696 ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984); Wesley v. State, 286 Ga. 355, 356 ( 689 SE2d 280 ) (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Wesley v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-696 ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984); Wesley v. State, 286 Ga. 355, 356 ( 689 SE2d 280 ) (2010). 2020Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-696 ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984); Wesley v. State, 286 Ga. 355, 356 ( 689 SE2d 280 ) (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Likewise, in Davis v. State, 168 Ga. App. 272, 275 (8) ( 308 SE2d 602 ) (1983), this court upheld a similar jury charge, concluding that “ [t] he trial judge’s instructions could not have caused the jury to misunderstand the burden of proof resting upon the state.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) In the instant case, it certainly would have been the better practice for the trial court to have more precisely followed the suggested pattern jury instruction by using the word “or” instead of the word “and” in the charge in question. 2015Likewise, in Davis v. State, 168 Ga. App. 272, 275 (8) ( 308 SE2d 602 ) (1983), this court upheld a similar jury charge, concluding that “ [t] he trial judge’s instructions could not have caused the jury to misunderstand the burden of proof resting upon the state.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) In the instant case, it certainly would have been the better practice for the trial court to have more precisely followed the suggested pattern jury instruction by using the word “or” instead of the word “and” in the charge in question. | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Nevertheless, in viewing the charge as a whole, as we are bound to do, “we conclude that it is not reasonably likely that the jury misapprehended the [s]tate’s burden of proof.” Anderson v. State, 286 Ga. 57, 59 (5) ( 685 SE2d 716 ) (2009). 2015Nevertheless, in viewing the charge as a whole, as we are bound to do, “we conclude that it is not reasonably likely that the jury misapprehended the [s]tate’s burden of proof.” Anderson v. State, 286 Ga. 57, 59 (5) ( 685 SE2d 716 ) (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Hodges v. Stategreen1 sentence2014There was direct evidence of Tremblay’s guilt based on the eyewitness testimony of the victim and Tremblay’s two friends. 2 In the recent case of Hodges v. State, 319 Ga. App. 657, 660 (3), n. 1 ( 738 SE2d 111 ) (2013), we questioned whether the suggested pattern jury instruction on justification and several of our cases indicating that an absence of revenge is an essential element of justification are still good law. | 1 | 1 |
Quintero v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Drummer v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Mizell v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Ledford v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Odom v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Crenshaw v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Kania v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Haggins v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Thompson v. State, supra at 106, fa. 2; Johnson v. State, 207 Ga. App. 34, 36 (2) (a) ( 427 SE2d 29 ) (1993). 1999See Thompson v. State, supra at 106, fa. 2; Johnson v. State, 207 Ga. App. 34, 36 (2) (a) ( 427 SE2d 29 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Kettman v. Stategreen2 sentences1998The instruction, however, was from the suggested pattern jury instruction and has previously been upheld by our Supreme Court in Kettman v. State, 257 Ga. 603, 605-606 (7) ( 362 SE2d 342 ) (1987). 1998The instruction, however, was from the suggested pattern jury instruction and has previously been upheld by our Supreme Court in Kettman v. State, 257 Ga. 603, 605-606 (7) ( 362 SE2d 342 ) (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2023Jackson v. State, 305 Ga. 614, 620-621 ( 825 SE2d 188 ) (2019) (holding that there was no clear error in giving pattern charge on defendant’s good character without additional language stating that “good character is a substantive fact which itself creates reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s 3 The suggested pattern jury instruction states as follows: You have heard evidence of the (character of the defendant) (character of the defendant for a particular trait, more specifically __________) in an effort to show that the defendant likely acted in keeping with such character or trait at pertin | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Ford v. State
green
1 sentence2014There was direct evidence of Tremblay’s guilt based on the eyewitness testimony of the victim and Tremblay’s two friends. 2 In the recent case of Hodges v. State, 319 Ga. App. 657, 660 (3), n. 1 ( 738 SE2d 111 ) (2013), we questioned whether the suggested pattern jury instruction on justification and several of our cases indicating that an absence of revenge is an essential element of justification are still good law. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
McKenzie v. State
green
1 sentence2013In two cases decided after Campbell’s trial, the Court of Appeals cautioned against giving the “great care and caution” charge when the defendant’s statement was exculpatory and recommended that the suggested pattern jury instruction “be modified to refer to incriminatory statements only, i.e., admissions and confessions.” See McKenzie, 293 Ga. App. at 353 ; Pincherli, 295 Ga. App. at 414 & n. 25. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Pincherli v. State
green
1 sentence2013In two cases decided after Campbell’s trial, the Court of Appeals cautioned against giving the “great care and caution” charge when the defendant’s statement was exculpatory and recommended that the suggested pattern jury instruction “be modified to refer to incriminatory statements only, i.e., admissions and confessions.” See McKenzie, 293 Ga. App. at 353 ; Pincherli, 295 Ga. App. at 414 & n. 25. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Isaac v. State
green
2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Warren v. State
green
2 sentences2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See 2006Smith, P. J., and Phipps, J., concur. 1 See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483 ) (2005). 2 See id. 3 See Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599, 600 ( 619 SE2d 636 ) (2005); Warren v. State, 233 Ga. App. 699 -700 (1) ( 505 SE2d 777 ) (1998). 4 See Mizell v. State, 266 Ga. App. 833, 835 (1) ( 598 SE2d 100 ) (2004); Drummer v. State, 264 Ga. App. 617, 619 (1) ( 591 SE2d 481 ) (2003). 5 See Hoggins v. State, 277 Ga. App. 742, 747 (6) ( 627 SE2d 448 ) (2006). 6 (Citation omitted.) Kania v. State, 280 Ga. App. 356, 358-359 (2) ( 634 SE2d 146 ) (2006). 7 (Punctuation omitted.) Haggins, supra. 8 See | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Tarvestad v. State
green
2 sentences2005Although he requested the suggested pattern jury instruction on self-defense and defense of others, Gravitt also relies on OCGA § 16-3-20 (6), the omnibus provision of Georgia’s justification statute: “The defense of justification can be claimed . . . [i]n all other instances which stand upon the same footing of reason and justice as those enumerated in [OCGA § 16-3-20 et seq.]” See Tarvestad v. State, 261 Ga. 605 ( 409 SE2d 513 ) (1991) (defendant was entitled to instruction on the defense of justification based on OCGA § 16-3-20 (6)). 2005Although he requested the suggested pattern jury instruction on self-defense and defense of others, Gravitt also relies on OCGA § 16-3-20 (6), the omnibus provision of Georgia’s justification statute: “The defense of justification can be claimed . . . [i]n all other instances which stand upon the same footing of reason and justice as those enumerated in [OCGA § 16-3-20 et seq.]” See Tarvestad v. State, 261 Ga. 605 ( 409 SE2d 513 ) (1991) (defendant was entitled to instruction on the defense of justification based on OCGA § 16-3-20 (6)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Pilzer v. Jones
green
2 sentences2003Pilzer v. Jones, 242 Ga.App. 198 (1), 529 S.E.2d 205 (2000); R.J. 2003Pilzer v. Jones, 242 Ga.App. 198 (1), 529 S.E.2d 205 (2000); R.J. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Cantrell v. State
green
2 sentences2001The jury instructions did not require unanimity with respect to the greater offense before consideration of the lesser included offense, a procedure prohibited by Cantrell v. State, 266 Ga. 700 , 469 S.E.2d 660 (1996). 2001The jury instructions did not require unanimity with respect to the greater offense before consideration of the lesser included offense, a procedure prohibited by Cantrell v. State, 266 Ga. 700 , 469 S.E.2d 660 (1996). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Farley v. State green | 1 | 1997–1997 |