Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1941–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowskigreen2 sentences2016The Iowa rule does not use the term “may.” The Minnesota court, however, has recently held that if a respondent fails to file a timely answer, “[u]pon the Director’s [of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility] motion, we deem[ ] the allegations in the petition admitted.” In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski, 834 N.W.2d 697, 701 (Minn.2013) (per curiam). 2016The Iowa rule does not use the term “may.” The Minnesota court, however, has recently held that if a respondent fails to file a timely answer, “[u]pon the Director’s [of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility] motion, we deem[ ] the allegations in the petition admitted.” In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski, 834 N.W.2d 697, 701 (Minn.2013) (per curiam). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Larsongreen2 sentences2016In In re Disciplinary Action Against Larson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota considered a case in which an attorney failed to file an answer within the time allowed by the Minnesota rule by a wide margin but subsequently filed an answer the day before a show-cause hearing. 324 N.W.2d 656 , 657 (Minn.1982) (per curiam). 2016In In re Disciplinary Action Against Larson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota considered a case in which an attorney failed to file an answer within the time allowed by the Minnesota rule by a wide margin but subsequently filed an answer the day before a show-cause hearing. 324 N.W.2d 656 , 657 (Minn.1982) (per curiam). | 1 | 2 |
Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'ngreen2 sentences2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). 2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). | 1 | 1 |
Lane v. Security Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). 2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois National Insurance Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.green1 sentence2001In Illinois National we compared Minnesota’s rule with Iowa’s pro rata approach, and held that we “prefer to apply our own rule.” Illinois Nat’l, 578 N.W.2d at 673. | 1 | 1 |
Ripka v. Mehusgreen1 sentence1999See Ripka v. Mehus, 390 N.W.2d 878, 880 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (interpreting similar Minnesota rule of evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authoritygreen2 sentences1990Thus, in Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 277 Minn. 76, 82 , 151 N.W.2d 584, 588 (1967), the court reached the merits of a plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action by affirming the long-standing Minnesota rule that a plaintiff may move for entry of dismissal in order to appeal from the adverse judgment. 1990Thus, in Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 277 Minn. 76, 82 , 151 N.W.2d 584, 588 (1967), the court reached the merits of a plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action by affirming the long-standing Minnesota rule that a plaintiff may move for entry of dismissal in order to appeal from the adverse judgment. | 1 | 1 |
Carden v. Johnsongreen2 sentences1990See also Carden v. Johnson, 282 Or. 169, 173 , 577 P.2d 513, 515 (1978) (plaintiff’s direct approach to appeal constitutional claim by seeking adverse judgment from trial court was “unorthodox and somewhat illogical” but more “efficient” than writ of mandamus); Annotation, Appellate Review at Instance of Plaintiff Who Has Requested, Induced, or Consented to Dismissal or Nonsuit, 23 A.L.R.2d 664 , 670 (1969 & 1989 Supp.). 1990See also Carden v. Johnson, 282 Or. 169, 173 , 577 P.2d 513, 515 (1978) (plaintiff’s direct approach to appeal constitutional claim by seeking adverse judgment from trial court was “unorthodox and somewhat illogical” but more “efficient” than writ of mandamus); Annotation, Appellate Review at Instance of Plaintiff Who Has Requested, Induced, or Consented to Dismissal or Nonsuit, 23 A.L.R.2d 664 , 670 (1969 & 1989 Supp.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Swensongreen2 sentences1976See State v. Swenson, 301 Minn. 199 , 221 N.W.2d 706, 708 (1974). 1976See State v. Swenson, 301 Minn. 199 , 221 N.W.2d 706, 708 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Volquardson v. Hartford Insurance
green
2 sentences2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). 2004Volquardson, 647 N.W.2d at 610 ; see also Watson, 566 N.W.2d at 691 (because the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy consistently used “the insured” and not “an insured,” the policy’s intentional loss provision incorporated an additional contract term; the policy thus was “at odds with the rights and benefits of the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy” because it failed to provide coverage for innocent coinsured spouses); Lane, 747 N.E.2d at 1272 (same). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Lange
green
1 sentence1999We have said that error is not preserved without an offer of proof “unless the whole record makes apparent what is sought to be proven.” Lange, 531 N.W.2d at 114 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Board of Supervisors v. ValAdCo
green
2 sentences1998The Minnesota test for a conflict was nearly identical to that applied in Iowa: “a local ordinance is invalid only if the express and implied terms of the ordinance and the state statute are irreconcilable.” Id. 1998The Minnesota test for a conflict was nearly identical to that applied in Iowa: “a local ordinance is invalid only if the express and implied terms of the ordinance and the state statute are irreconcilable.” Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Berghammer v. Smith
green
1 sentence1992We concluded that: “[B]y enforcing the now discarded Minnesota rule, we would ignore our own state policy without advancing Minnesota’s.” Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc.
green
2 sentences1978Minnesota’s rule explained in Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc., 301 Minn. 108 , 223 N.W.2d 376 (1974), would not support a different result here. 1978Minnesota’s rule explained in Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc., 301 Minn. 108 , 223 N.W.2d 376 (1974), would not support a different result here. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Reich v. Purcell
green
2 sentences1971Law Review 551 (a series of comments on Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 .) We must decide two questions to dispose of this issue: (1) Is Minnesota the state of most significant relationship; and (2) if so, which Minnesota rule should be applied under the particular facts of this case, the one in effect at the time of this accident (which denies recovery) or the one recently adopted in the Thill case (which permits it). 1971Law Review 551 (a series of comments on Reich v. Purcell, 67 Cal.2d 551 , 63 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 432 P.2d 727 .) We must decide two questions to dispose of this issue: (1) Is Minnesota the state of most significant relationship; and (2) if so, which Minnesota rule should be applied under the particular facts of this case, the one in effect at the time of this accident (which denies recovery) or the one recently adopted in the Thill case (which permits it). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Hickman v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1968Advisory Committee on Rules in making recommendations for revisions to provide broader discovery procedures, after considering the problem of Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 , 67 S.Ct. 385 , 91 L.Ed. 451 , suggested adoption of either the New Jersey provision or the Minnesota rule. 1968Advisory Committee on Rules in making recommendations for revisions to provide broader discovery procedures, after considering the problem of Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 , 67 S.Ct. 385 , 91 L.Ed. 451 , suggested adoption of either the New Jersey provision or the Minnesota rule. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1953Defendant refers to the' Minnesota rule as announced in the case of Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co., 190 Minn. 616, 621 , 252 N.W. 837, 839 . 1953Defendant refers to the' Minnesota rule as announced in the case of Dwyer v. Illinois Oil Co., 190 Minn. 616, 621 , 252 N.W. 837, 839 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Hinchcliff v. District Court
green
2 sentences1941Nickell v. District Court, 202 Iowa 408 , 210 N. W. 563 , and Hinchcliff v. District Court, 204 Iowa 470 , 215 N. W. 605 , present a situation analogous to that before us. 1941Nickell v. District Court, 202 Iowa 408 , 210 N. W. 563 , and Hinchcliff v. District Court, 204 Iowa 470 , 215 N. W. 605 , present a situation analogous to that before us. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Chariton Finance Co. v. Wennerstrum
green
2 sentences1941Chariton Finance Co. v. Wennerstrum, 226 Iowa 464 , 284 N. W. 375 ; State v. Associated Pack. 1941Chariton Finance Co. v. Wennerstrum, 226 Iowa 464 , 284 N. W. 375 ; State v. Associated Pack. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Nickell v. District Court of Clarke County
green
2 sentences1941Nickell v. District Court, 202 Iowa 408 , 210 N. W. 563 , and Hinchcliff v. District Court, 204 Iowa 470 , 215 N. W. 605 , present a situation analogous to that before us. 1941Nickell v. District Court, 202 Iowa 408 , 210 N. W. 563 , and Hinchcliff v. District Court, 204 Iowa 470 , 215 N. W. 605 , present a situation analogous to that before us. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.