Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Metcalfegreen2 sentences2024People v. Terrell, 185 Ill. 2d 467, 489 (1998); People v. Bishop, 218 Ill. 2d 232, 251 (2006). ¶ 31 A. For Cause Challenge ¶ 32 Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion because Jerry H. “stated repeatedly that he would be biased against” defendant and the trial court “allowed many jurors who expressed a similar reluctance to serve to be excused.” The State asserts that the defendant affirmatively waived his objection to Jerry H. by “failing to exercise an available peremptory challenge” to remove him. ¶ 33 “It is well established that the failure of defense counsel to challe 2017People v. Metcalfe, 202 Ill. 2d 544, 561-62 (2002). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Bowmangreen2 sentences2002In Bowman , the appellate court held that the decision to exercise an available peremptory challenge is a strategic one, and further held that the defendant had failed to show that his counsel’s decisions “questionable as they might be, were not tactical and a matter of jury selection strategy.” Bowman , 325 Ill. 2002In Bowman, the appellate court held that the decision to exercise an available peremptory challenge is a strategic one, and further held that the defendant had failed to show that his counsel’s decisions “questionable as they might be, were not tactical and a matter of jury selection strategy.” Bowman, 325 Ill. | 1 | 3 |
People v. Bowensgreen2 sentences2024Id. 2021People v. Bowens, 407 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Terrellgreen1 sentence2024People v. Terrell, 185 Ill. 2d 467, 489 (1998); People v. Bishop, 218 Ill. 2d 232, 251 (2006). ¶ 31 A. For Cause Challenge ¶ 32 Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion because Jerry H. “stated repeatedly that he would be biased against” defendant and the trial court “allowed many jurors who expressed a similar reluctance to serve to be excused.” The State asserts that the defendant affirmatively waived his objection to Jerry H. by “failing to exercise an available peremptory challenge” to remove him. ¶ 33 “It is well established that the failure of defense counsel to challe | 1 | 1 |
People v. MacRigreen1 sentence2024People v. Terrell, 185 Ill. 2d 467, 489 (1998); People v. Bishop, 218 Ill. 2d 232, 251 (2006). ¶ 31 A. For Cause Challenge ¶ 32 Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion because Jerry H. “stated repeatedly that he would be biased against” defendant and the trial court “allowed many jurors who expressed a similar reluctance to serve to be excused.” The State asserts that the defendant affirmatively waived his objection to Jerry H. by “failing to exercise an available peremptory challenge” to remove him. ¶ 33 “It is well established that the failure of defense counsel to challe | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bishopgreen1 sentence2024People v. Terrell, 185 Ill. 2d 467, 489 (1998); People v. Bishop, 218 Ill. 2d 232, 251 (2006). ¶ 31 A. For Cause Challenge ¶ 32 Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion because Jerry H. “stated repeatedly that he would be biased against” defendant and the trial court “allowed many jurors who expressed a similar reluctance to serve to be excused.” The State asserts that the defendant affirmatively waived his objection to Jerry H. by “failing to exercise an available peremptory challenge” to remove him. ¶ 33 “It is well established that the failure of defense counsel to challe | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Perry
green
2 sentences2017Perry, 224 Ill. 2d at 342 . ¶ 48 The decision to exercise an available peremptory challenge is a strategic one and generally not subject to scrutiny under Strickland. 2017Perry, 224 Ill. 2d at 342 . ¶ 48 The decision to exercise an available peremptory challenge is a strategic one and generally not subject to scrutiny under Strickland. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2001Wilson, 303 Ill. 2001Wilson , 303 Ill. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. Cronic
green
2 sentences1999Defendant maintains these alleged errors are so egregious that this court can presume ineffective assistance pursuant to United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 80 L. 1999Defendant maintains these alleged errors are so egregious that this court can presume ineffective assistance pursuant to United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 80 L. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Martin
green
2 sentences1999Martin, 271 Ill. 1999Martin, 271 Ill. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2020In addition, defendant argues that his counsel was ineffective when he failed to request a jury instruction on the justified use of force by a private person in making a citizen’s arrest where the theory of the defense was that defendant justifiably discharged his firearm while attempting to catch the person whom he believed had committed a home invasion and then threated his life afterward on the street. ¶ 40 To establish that trial counsel was ineffective, the defendant must satisfy the standard articulated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Rinehart
green
1 sentence2018Defense counsel did not use an available peremptory challenge against juror J.W. ¶ 94 In People v. Rinehart , 2012 IL 111719 , 356 Ill.Dec. 759 , 962 N.E.2d 444 , our supreme court discussed the right to an impartial jury encompassed within the constitutional right to a jury trial. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Rinehart
green
2 sentences2018Defense counsel did not use an available peremptory challenge against juror J.W. ¶ 94 In People v. Rinehart , 2012 IL 111719 , 356 Ill.Dec. 759 , 962 N.E.2d 444 , our supreme court discussed the right to an impartial jury encompassed within the constitutional right to a jury trial. 2018Defense counsel did not use an available peremptory challenge against juror J.W. ¶ 94 In People v. Rinehart , 2012 IL 111719 , 356 Ill.Dec. 759 , 962 N.E.2d 444 , our supreme court discussed the right to an impartial jury encompassed within the constitutional right to a jury trial. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1993App. 3d 952, 955 , 516 N.E.2d 343, 345 .) Similarly, such an issue will be considered waived for purposes of appeal if the defendant failed to exercise an available peremptory challenge to exclude the objectionable juror. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Brooks
green
1 sentence1993People v. Brooks (1989), 185 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.