Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Whitfieldgreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., People v. Whitfield, 228 Ill. 2d 502 (2007); People v. Robinson, 223 Ill. 2d 165 (2006). 2008See, e.g., People v. Whitfield, 228 Ill.2d 502 , 321 Ill.Dec. 233 , 888 N.E.2d 1166 (2007); People v. Robinson, 223 Ill.2d 165 , 308 Ill.Dec. 19 , 860 N.E.2d 1101 (2006). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Baezgreen1 sentence2025The failure to include a claim in a motion made under that section “results in forfeiture of that claim.” People v. Baez, 241 Ill. 2d 44, 129 (2011) (citing People v. Enoch, 122 Ill. 2d 176, 186 (1988)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Schlossergreen1 sentence2025People v. Turner, 187 Ill. 2d 406, 412-13 (1999) (“Counsel’s -9- 1-23-1640 failure to amend the post-conviction petition to allege ineffective assistance of appellate counsel prevented the circuit court from considering the merits of petitioner’s claims.”). “[A]t a minimum, the duty to adequately or properly present [the] defendant’s claims ‘necessarily includes attempting to overcome procedural bars’ that will otherwise defeat his claims. [Citation.] Postconviction counsel must try to meet procedural requirements in order to adequately advance defendant’s claims under the Act.” People v. Schl | 1 | 1 |
People v. Enochgreen1 sentence2025The failure to include a claim in a motion made under that section “results in forfeiture of that claim.” People v. Baez, 241 Ill. 2d 44, 129 (2011) (citing People v. Enoch, 122 Ill. 2d 176, 186 (1988)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Suarezgreen1 sentence2025People v. Turner, 187 Ill. 2d 406, 412-13 (1999) (“Counsel’s -9- 1-23-1640 failure to amend the post-conviction petition to allege ineffective assistance of appellate counsel prevented the circuit court from considering the merits of petitioner’s claims.”). “[A]t a minimum, the duty to adequately or properly present [the] defendant’s claims ‘necessarily includes attempting to overcome procedural bars’ that will otherwise defeat his claims. [Citation.] Postconviction counsel must try to meet procedural requirements in order to adequately advance defendant’s claims under the Act.” People v. Schl | 1 | 1 |
People v. Perkinsgreen1 sentence2025People v. Turner, 187 Ill. 2d 406, 412-13 (1999) (“Counsel’s -9- 1-23-1640 failure to amend the post-conviction petition to allege ineffective assistance of appellate counsel prevented the circuit court from considering the merits of petitioner’s claims.”). “[A]t a minimum, the duty to adequately or properly present [the] defendant’s claims ‘necessarily includes attempting to overcome procedural bars’ that will otherwise defeat his claims. [Citation.] Postconviction counsel must try to meet procedural requirements in order to adequately advance defendant’s claims under the Act.” People v. Schl | 1 | 1 |
People v. Turnergreen1 sentence2025People v. Turner, 187 Ill. 2d 406, 412-13 (1999) (“Counsel’s -9- 1-23-1640 failure to amend the post-conviction petition to allege ineffective assistance of appellate counsel prevented the circuit court from considering the merits of petitioner’s claims.”). “[A]t a minimum, the duty to adequately or properly present [the] defendant’s claims ‘necessarily includes attempting to overcome procedural bars’ that will otherwise defeat his claims. [Citation.] Postconviction counsel must try to meet procedural requirements in order to adequately advance defendant’s claims under the Act.” People v. Schl | 1 | 1 |
Decker v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.green1 sentence2024App. 3d 24, 29 (2003) (If the issue is solely one of law, which is reviewed de novo, and thus, “are not inherently impacted by the failure to include the instruction conference colloquy, we may address the merits without a complete report of the proceedings.”). ¶ 26 Under a voluntary undertaking theory of liability, “ ‘[o]ne who voluntarily undertakes to render services to another is liable for bodily harm caused by his failure to perform such services with due care or with such competence and skill as he possesses.’ ” Decker v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 268 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Pattersongreen1 sentence2024People v. Heider, 231 Ill. 2d 1, 18 , 896 N.E.2d 239, 249 (2008); see People v. Patterson, 392 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Heidergreen2 sentences2024People v. Heider, 231 Ill. 2d 1, 18 , 896 N.E.2d 239, 249 (2008); see People v. Patterson, 392 Ill. 2024People v. Heider, 231 Ill. 2d 1, 18 , 896 N.E.2d 239, 249 (2008); see People v. Patterson, 392 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Siklas v. Ecker Center for Mental Health, Inc.green1 sentence2024App. 3d 521, 526 (1994) (quoting Siklas v. Ecker Center for Mental Health, Inc., 248 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2024See People v. Johnson, 238 Ill. 2d 478, 484 (2010) (stating the failure to include an error in a posttrial motion results in forfeiture of the error for appellate review). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Luckettgreen1 sentence2017See Luckett, 273 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wyeth v. Levine
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 573 , 129 S.Ct. 1187 . 2019Id. at 573 , 129 S.Ct. 1187 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2008See, e.g., People v. Whitfield, 228 Ill. 2d 502 (2007); People v. Robinson, 223 Ill. 2d 165 (2006). 2008See, e.g., People v. Whitfield, 228 Ill.2d 502 , 321 Ill.Dec. 233 , 888 N.E.2d 1166 (2007); People v. Robinson, 223 Ill.2d 165 , 308 Ill.Dec. 19 , 860 N.E.2d 1101 (2006). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
McNames v. Rockford Park District
green
2 sentences2003McNames v. Rockford Park District, 185 Ill. 2003McNames v. Rockford Park District , 185 Ill. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Ratliff
green
1 sentence2025The portions of the court’s Ratliff opinion concerning waiver thus plainly do not apply here. ¶ 34 However, the court in Ratliff went on to opine that “[e]ven if” the court had been presented, not with a case of waiver but one of forfeiture, the claim the defendant was making was simply - 11 - No. 1-23-0584 “not cognizable as second-prong plain error.” Ratliff, 2024 IL 129356, ¶ 29 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
The PEOPLE v. Hysell
neutral
1 sentence1974(People v. Hysell, 48 Ill.2d 522 ), and also by the failure to include the claim in the original post-conviction petition which amounts to a waiver of the issue as well. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
McGovern v. City of Chicago
neutral
1 sentence1927The opinion states that the decisions are easily reconciled with each other; that in McGovern v. City of Chicago, supra, the affidavit presented only the defense of payment, and it was held that other defenses had been waived; that in Reddig v. Looney, supra, the defendant had not been permitted to show that certain labors and materials were not furnished as charged in the declaration. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Reddig v. Looney
neutral
1 sentence1927The opinion states that the decisions are easily reconciled with each other; that in McGovern v. City of Chicago, supra, the affidavit presented only the defense of payment, and it was held that other defenses had been waived; that in Reddig v. Looney, supra, the defendant had not been permitted to show that certain labors and materials were not furnished as charged in the declaration. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.