Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1968–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Companygreen2 sentences1975Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Company, 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966); Troxlair v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 291 So.2d 797 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1974); Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 210 So.2d 897 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1968); Katz v. Insurance Company of North American, 150 So.2d 879 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1963). 1968See Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Co., 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir., 1966), also Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 210 So.2d 897 (La.App. 1st Cir., 1968). | 1 | 2 |
Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.green2 sentences1975Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Company, 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966); Troxlair v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 291 So.2d 797 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1974); Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 210 So.2d 897 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1968); Katz v. Insurance Company of North American, 150 So.2d 879 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1963). 1968See Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Co., 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir., 1966), also Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 210 So.2d 897 (La.App. 1st Cir., 1968). | 1 | 2 |
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co.green1 sentence2017See Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co., 606 So.2d 1320, 1324 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 608 So.2d 1010 (La.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co.green1 sentence2017See Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co., 606 So.2d 1320, 1324 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 608 So.2d 1010 (La.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Francisgreen1 sentence1996Martin v. Francis, 600 So.2d 1382, 1387 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 606 So.2d 541 (La.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Joubert v. Texas Industriesgreen1 sentence1987As no objection to the jury instructions was made, appellant is precluded from raising the issue on appeal. 1 La.C.C.P. art. 1793; Joubert v. Texas Industries, 401 So.2d 571, 573 (La.App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, 404 So.2d 1257 (La.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Companygreen1 sentence1982Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 309 So.2d 402, 405 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ryals v. Home Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1988Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 445 So.2d 206 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984); Ryals v. Home Insurance Company, 410 So.2d 827 (La.App. 3 Cir.1982), writ den., 414 So.2d 375 (La.1982). 1985Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Ryals v. Home Insurance Company, 410 So.2d 827 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1982) rehearing denied March 23, 1982. | 2 | 1985–1988 |
McCrea v. Petroleum, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2009(Emphasis added.) In McCrea v. Petroleum, Inc., 96-1962, pp. 6-7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/29/97), 705 So.2d 787, 791 , appears the following: Additionally, we note that the trial court is required to instruct the jurors on the law applicable to the cause submitted to them, pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. art. 1792(B). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Martin v. Francis
green
1 sentence1996Martin v. Francis, 600 So.2d 1382, 1387 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 606 So.2d 541 (La.1992). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Ryals v. Home Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1988Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 445 So.2d 206 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984); Ryals v. Home Insurance Company, 410 So.2d 827 (La.App. 3 Cir.1982), writ den., 414 So.2d 375 (La.1982). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Wright v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
neutral
1 sentence1988Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 445 So.2d 206 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984); Ryals v. Home Insurance Company, 410 So.2d 827 (La.App. 3 Cir.1982), writ den., 414 So.2d 375 (La.1982). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Succession of Dugas
neutral
1 sentence1987As no objection to the jury instructions was made, appellant is precluded from raising the issue on appeal. 1 La.C.C.P. art. 1793; Joubert v. Texas Industries, 401 So.2d 571, 573 (La.App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, 404 So.2d 1257 (La.1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Robillard v. P & R RACETRACKS, INC.
green
1 sentence1985Robillard v. P & R Racetracks, Inc., 405 So.2d 1203 (La. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Fincher v. Surrette
green
1 sentence1983Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." *494 See also Fincher v. Surrette, 365 So.2d 860 (La.App. 4th Cir.1978), and numerous other decisions requiring strict compliance with Art. 1793. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Williams v. City of Alexandria
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Devillier v. City of Opelousas
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." (Emphasis ours.) Plaintiffs point out that defendants' "blanket objection" to the judge's failure to submit defendants' special interrogatories did not comply with this procedural article. [6] See also Devillier v. City of Opelousas, 247 So.2d 412 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1971). [7] The pertinent requested jury charges read as follows: "DEFENDANT'S REQUESTED JURY CHARGE NO. 1 Where, as here, no employee benefits were vested prior to 1 April 1976, the ERISA did not prohibit Dixie Life from amending its plan retroactively | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Stevens v. GULF AMERICAN FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Yarbrough v. Louisiana Cement Co., Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Williams v. City of Alexandria
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
green
2 sentences1982Nachman Corporation v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., et al, 446 U.S. 359 , 100 S.Ct. 1723 , 64 L.Ed.2d 354 CCH Pension Plan Guide, § 22-636 (5-16-80)." "DEFENDANT'S REQUESTED JURY CHARGE NO. 6 You are instructed that the Federal law, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, provides in Section 1061 as follows: `In the case of a plan existing on January 1, 1974, this part shall apply in the case of plan years beginning after December 31, 1975.' The provisions referred to in Section 1061 are the provisions concerning retroactive amendment of Pension Plans reducing pension benefits to emplo 1982Nachman Corporation v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., et al, 446 U.S. 359 , 100 S.Ct. 1723 , 64 L.Ed.2d 354 CCH Pension Plan Guide, § 22-636 (5-16-80)." "DEFENDANT'S REQUESTED JURY CHARGE NO. 6 You are instructed that the Federal law, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, provides in Section 1061 as follows: `In the case of a plan existing on January 1, 1974, this part shall apply in the case of plan years beginning after December 31, 1975.' The provisions referred to in Section 1061 are the provisions concerning retroactive amendment of Pension Plans reducing pension benefits to emplo | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Druilhet v. Comeaux
green
1 sentence1982Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." See also Kolmaister v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 370 So.2d 630 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1979), writ denied 373 So.2d 531 (La.1979); Druilhet v. Comeaux, 317 So.2d 270 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), writ denied 321 So.2d 363 (La.1975); Williams v. City of Alexandria, 376 So.2d 367 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979), writ denied 378 So.2d 432 (La.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies Inc.
green
1 sentence1977See: Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., 321 So.2d 844 (La.App. 1st Cir., 1975) writs den. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Troxlair v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
green
1 sentence1975Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Company, 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966); Troxlair v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 291 So.2d 797 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1974); Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 210 So.2d 897 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1968); Katz v. Insurance Company of North American, 150 So.2d 879 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1963). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Katz v. Insurance Co. of North America
neutral
1 sentence1975Gryder v. Travelers Insurance Company, 193 So.2d 532 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1966); Troxlair v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 291 So.2d 797 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1974); Mulkey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 210 So.2d 897 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1968); Katz v. Insurance Company of North American, 150 So.2d 879 (La.App., 4th Cir. 1963). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.