valid jury waiver (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

valid jury waiver in Louisiana

14 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Nanlalgreen
la · 1997 · cited in 10 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–2021
2 sentences

2021See State v. Nanlal, 97- 0786 La. 9 / 26/ 97), 701 So. 2d 963 ; State v. Chavis, 2011- 1685 ( La.

2018See State v. Nanlal , 97-0786 (La. 9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 -964.

610
State v. Parkergreen
la · 2006 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See also State v. McCloud, 04-1112, p. 7 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 901 So.2d 498, 504 , writ denied, 05-1450 (La.1/13/06), 920 So.2d 235 , in which this Court found that, if the trial court found there was a valid jury waiver, then the defendants conviction and sentence was affirmed.

2008Id.

12
State v. Cappelgreen
lactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013State v. Cappel, 525 So.2d 335, 337 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 468 (La.1988). 120When the record does not clearly indicate a valid waiver of the right to a jury trial, the recent trend has not been to reverse, but to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether a valid jury waiver was obtained.

11
State v. McCloudgreen
lactapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008See also State v. McCloud, 04-1112, p. 7 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 901 So.2d 498, 504 , writ denied, 05-1450 (La.1/13/06), 920 So.2d 235 , in which this Court found that, if the trial court found there was a valid jury waiver, then the defendants conviction and sentence was affirmed.

11
State v. Jamesgreen
lactapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See, State v. James, 99-KA-1047 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1/25/00), 751 So.2d 419 , a copy of which is attached.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. James green
lactapp · 1995
2 sentences

2006State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.App. 5th Cir.1/26/99), 726 So.2d 1112 ; State v. Nanlal, 97-0786 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App. 5th Cir.8/25/98), 717 So.2d 1243 ; State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 .

1999However, citing this Court's decision in State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5th Cir. 5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 , the Louisiana Supreme Court appears to have sanctioned the procedure of remanding to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether a valid jury waiver was obtained.

41999–2006
State v. Stoltz green
lactapp · 1998
2 sentences

2006State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.App. 5th Cir.1/26/99), 726 So.2d 1112 ; State v. Nanlal, 97-0786 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App. 5th Cir.8/25/98), 717 So.2d 1243 ; State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 .

1999State v. Nanlal, 97-0786 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App. 5 Cir.8/25/98), 717 So.2d 1243 ; State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5 Cir.5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 .

31999–2006
State v. Brual neutral
lactapp · 1999
2 sentences

2006State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.App. 5th Cir.1/26/99), 726 So.2d 1112 ; State v. Nanlal, 97-0786 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App. 5th Cir.8/25/98), 717 So.2d 1243 ; State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5th Cir.5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 .

1999State v. Nanlal, 97-0786 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 963 ; State v. Stoltz, 98-235 (La.App. 5 Cir.8/25/98), 717 So.2d 1243 ; State v. James, 94-720 (La.App. 5 Cir.5/30/95), 656 So.2d 746 , State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.App. 5 Cir.1/26/99), 726 So.2d 1112 .

21999–2006
State v. Cappel green
la · 1988
1 sentence

2013State v. Cappel, 525 So.2d 335, 337 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 468 (La.1988). 120When the record does not clearly indicate a valid waiver of the right to a jury trial, the recent trend has not been to reverse, but to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether a valid jury waiver was obtained.

12013–2013
Perez v. Stephens green
la · 1998
1 sentence

1998State v. Freeman, 98-0516 (La.6/26/98), 719 So.2d 486 .

11998–1998

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:10 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:24 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:438 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 88 (1974–2026) TX 14 (1998–2023) OH 14 (1999–2024) LA 14 (1998–2021) CA 13 (1971–2026) NY 5 (1996–2024) WA 4 (1998–2021) MD 3 (2011–2022) HI 3 (2005–2013) OR 2 (2013–2013) WY 2 (1986–1995) WI 2 (1999–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check