Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Braun v. Pettygreen2 sentences2009A petition may not be dismissed for violating the statute of limitations “unless it is clearly established on the petition’s face and without exception that the cause of action is time barred.” Braun v. Petty, 31 S.W.3d 521, 523 (Mo.App. 2008A petition may not be dismissed for violating the statute of limitations “unless it is clearly established on the petition’s face and without exception that the cause of action is time barred.” Braun v. Petty, 31 S.W.3d 521, 523 (Mo.App. | 4 | 5 |
Hrb v. Jlggreen2 sentences1998H.R.B. v. J.L.G., 913 S.W.2d 92, 96 (Mo.App.1995). 1998H.R.B. v. J.L.G., 913 S.W.2d 92, 96 (Mo.App.1995). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Community Title Co. v. U.S. Title Guaranty Co.
green
2 sentences2014“If the statute of limitations is raised as an affirmative defense, the trial court may not dismiss the petition unless it is clearly established, on the petition’s face and without exception, that the cause of action is barred.” Community Title Co., 965 S.W.2d at 250 . 3 All statutory references are to RSMo 2012. 7 Here, the Post did not file an answer to the Estate’s Petition but instead filed two motions to dismiss. 2014“If the statute of limitations is raised as an affirmative defense, the trial court may not dismiss the petition unless it is clearly established, on the petition’s face and without exception, that the cause of action is barred.” Community Title Co., 965 S.W.2d at 250 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Sheehan v. Sheehan
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 59 . 1995Id. at 59 . | 2 | 1995–1995 |
Basye v. Fayette R-III School District Board of Education
green
1 sentence2024To succeed on a motion to dismiss on the affirmative defense of a statute of limitations, it must clearly be established "on the petition's face and without exception that the cause of action is time barred." Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Horn
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
City of Ellisville v. Lohman
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.