telephone hearing in Missouri

2023See Wunderlich v. Jenson, 496 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016) (claimant who did not have good cause for failing to appear at his hearing because of his mistaken belief that the start time of his hearing was flexible); Robinson v. Div. of Emp.Security, 274 S.W.3d 505, 508 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) (“The Appeals Tribunal is not required to accommodate a party that does not follow the clearly stated directions in the notice of hearing.”); Guyton v. Div. of Emp.

2013See id.; see also Robinson v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 274 S.W.3d 505, 508 (Mo.App.

2014Ms. Gunn fails to cite any authority to support this contention. 5 “Mere conclusions and the failure to develop an argument with support from legal authority preserve nothing for review.” Kimble v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 388 S.W.3d 634, 643 (Mo.App.

2014Ms. Gunn fails to cite any authority to support this 4 No issue is presented in this appeal, and we therefore do not address, whether the Church‟s failure to notify Ms. Gunn of her exclusion from the coverage of the Employment Security Law has other consequences under the statute. 6 contention. 5 “Mere conclusions and the failure to develop an argument with support from legal authority preserve nothing for review.” Kimble v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 388 S.W.3d 634, 643 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

2016Speed, 402 S.W.3d at 156 , and fifteen minutes .after the designated hearing time,, Wilson v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 359 S.W.3d 133 ', 136 (Mo.App.W.D. 2012).

2012Wilson v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 359 S.W.3d 133, 136 (Mo.App.

2010Id. at 625 .

2010In Jenkins v. Manpower On Site at Proctor & Gamble, 106 S.W.3d 620, 623-24 (Mo.App.

2010Id.

2003See Brawley & Flowers, Inc. v. Gunter, 934 S.W.2d 557, 561 (Mo.App.1996) (holding that an employer who “failed to follow clearly stated directions” in a notice of a telephone hearing with the appeals tribunal was “not in a position to say its was denied reasonable opportunity for a fair hearing”).

2023Stevenson v. Div. of Emp't Sec., 359 S.W.3d 91, 93 (Mo. App. W.D. 2011).

2023See Wunderlich v. Jenson, 496 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016) (claimant who did not have good cause for failing to appear at his hearing because of his mistaken belief that the start time of his hearing was flexible); Robinson v. Div. of Emp.Security, 274 S.W.3d 505, 508 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) (“The Appeals Tribunal is not required to accommodate a party that does not follow the clearly stated directions in the notice of hearing.”); Guyton v. Div. of Emp.

2023See Hubbard v. Schaefer Autobody Ctrs., Inc., 561 S.W.3d 458, 462 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018) (“[T]he Appeals Tribunal may enter an order dismissing an appeal ‘in any case wherein the appellant, after having been duly notified of the date, time, and place of the hearing, shall fail to appear at such hearing.’”) (quoting section 288.190.3).

2021See Katz, 347 S.W.3d at 546 ; Kunzie, 330 S.W.3d at 481 , 481 n.7; see also Nitro Distributing, Inc., 194 S.W.3d at 352.

2016All regulatory references are to the .Missouri Code of State Regulations (October 31, 2013). 4 . ‘‘[W]e note that..the method by which a claimant appears at a telephone hearing has changed.” Speed v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 402 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Mo.App.W.D. 2013).

2016"Previously, a claimant appeared for a telephone hearing by ensuring 'that the referee had his or her proper phone number and by being available to receive the call from the referee at the appointed time.” Id.

2013Guyton v. Div. of Emp’t Sec., 375 S.W.3d 254, 256 (Mo.App.

2007Johnson v. Mo. Bd. of Nursing Adm’rs, 130 S.W.3d 619, 644 (Mo.App.

2007Comm’n, 482 S.W.2d 739, 742 (Mo.1972); § 586.070.8. 1 A complaint about the admission of hearsay evidence during a telephone hearing is not preserved for appeal if no objection was made at the time of the hearing.

2003Finnical v. Finnical, 81 S.W.3d 554, 557 (Mo.App.2002).

2003“It is an appellant’s obligation to cite appropriate and available precedent if [the appellant] expects to prevail.” In re Marriage of Spears, 995 S.W.2d 500, 503 (Mo.App.1999).