14 New York opinions name it 6 courts 1925–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Forbesgreen2 sentences2025Although not binding on this court, the factors set forth in People v Forbes ( 182 AD2d 829, 829-830 [4th Dept 1992]) provide a useful framework to determine whether a defendant was in custody: "(1) the amount of time the defendant spent with the police, (2) whether [the defendant's] freedom of action was restricted in any significant manner," (3) the location and atmosphere in which the defendant was questioned, (4) the degree of cooperation exhibited by the defendant, (5) whether [the defendant] was apprised of his constitutional rights, and (6) whether the questioning was investigatory or a 2025Although not binding on this court, the factors set forth in People v Forbes ( 182 AD2d 829, 829-830 [4th Dept 1992]) provide a useful framework to determine whether a defendant was in custody: "(1) the amount of time the defendant spent with the police, (2) whether [the defendant's] freedom of action was restricted in any significant manner," (3) the location and atmosphere in which the defendant was questioned, (4) the degree of cooperation exhibited by the defendant, (5) whether [the defendant] was apprised of his constitutional rights, and (6) whether the questioning was investigatory or a | 3 | 3 |
People v. Bridgmangreen2 sentences2025Although not binding on this Court, the factors set forth in People v. Bridgman ( 163 Misc 2d 818, 820 [City Court, City of Canandaigua 1995]) provide a useful framework for the hardship privilege analysis. 2025Those factors are: "(1) the presence or absence of licensed persons present in the licensee's household; (2) the ability of other licensed household members to provide transportation for the licensee; (3) the occupation and health condition of the licensee; (4) the proximity of the licensee's place of employment, health care provider or school to his or her household; (5) the presence or absence of any public transportation or taxi service to or from the licensee's household to the place of employment, health care provider or school; (6) a consideration of the licensee's ability to afford publ | 1 | 1 |
Andrews v. . Gardinergreen1 sentence2003A most useful test “[t]o appreciate . . . pertinency, [is to] ask . . . what the duty of [the participants] would have been, had [the statement] been true” (Andrews v Gardiner, 224 NY 440, 446 [1918]). | 1 | 1 |
Martirano v. Frostgreen1 sentence2003This question gives ready guidance as to whether “the statement [is] so outrageously out of [the litigation] context as to permit one to conclude, from the mere fact that the statement was uttered, that it was motivated by no other desire than to defame” (Martirano v Frost, 25 NY2d 505, 508 [1969]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Wilkinsgreen1 sentence1998In People v Wilkins ( 68 NY2d 269, 273 [1986]) the Court of Appeals observed that the “statutory scheme regulating Grand Jury proceedings does not contemplate the termination of deliberations without some action by the Grand Jury.” The Court held that when a prosecutor withdraws a case from the Grand Jury after presenting the People’s evidence but prior to the Grand Jury’s vote, the withdrawal is considered a dismissal for purposes of CPL 190.75. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v. Shah
green
1 sentence2018Judge Bellacosa,{**32 NY3d at 280} dissenting in Boreali , warned that Boreali 's "dramatic[ ] change[ ]" to "the principles of ordinary statutory construction . . . will come back to haunt us" ( 71 NY2d at 19 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Boreali v. Axelrod
green
1 sentence2018Judge Bellacosa,{**32 NY3d at 280} dissenting in Boreali , warned that Boreali 's "dramatic[ ] change[ ]" to "the principles of ordinary statutory construction . . . will come back to haunt us" ( 71 NY2d at 19 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corporation
green
2 sentences2012Blair & Co., Inc. v Gottdiener, 462 F3d 95 , 103 [2d Cir 2006].) Judge Sotomayor’s well-reasoned opinion in Specht v Netscape Communications Corp. ( 306 F3d 17 [2d Cir 2002]) provides a useful framework for further analysis of the issue. 2012In Specht , the court applied precedents “from the world of paper contracting” to “the emergent world of online product delivery.” ( 306 F3d at 31 .) The plaintiffs in that case were Internet users who had downloaded software from defendants’ web page. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Blair & Co., Inc. v. Gottdiener
green
1 sentence2012Blair & Co., Inc. v Gottdiener, 462 F3d 95 , 103 [2d Cir 2006].) Judge Sotomayor’s well-reasoned opinion in Specht v Netscape Communications Corp. ( 306 F3d 17 [2d Cir 2002]) provides a useful framework for further analysis of the issue. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
People v. Fortin
green
1 sentence2005A useful analysis of the steps to be taken in order to make a determination of general acceptance may be found in the case of People v Fortin ( 184 Misc 2d 10 [2000]), in which the defendant in this criminal case had requested a Frye hearing in an effort to introduce evidence, through a psychiatrist, of parental alienation syndrome. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Davis (Byron) v. Mummert (Thomas C.)
neutral
1 sentence1995However, there is an emerging consensus in the majority of recently reported cases in the United States (see, Friedrich v Friedrich, 983 F2d 1396, supra; Levesque v Levesque, supra, at 665; Matter of Ponath, 829 F Supp 363 [D Utah 1993]; Slagenweit v Slagenweit, 841 F Supp 264 [ND Iowa 1993], appeal dismissed 43 F3d 1476 [8th Cir 1994]; Falls v Downie, 871 F Supp 100 [D Mass 1994]) that British courts have provided a useful analysis of the term habitual residence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit
green
1 sentence1995However, there is an emerging consensus in the majority of recently reported cases in the United States (see, Friedrich v Friedrich, 983 F2d 1396, supra; Levesque v Levesque, supra, at 665; Matter of Ponath, 829 F Supp 363 [D Utah 1993]; Slagenweit v Slagenweit, 841 F Supp 264 [ND Iowa 1993], appeal dismissed 43 F3d 1476 [8th Cir 1994]; Falls v Downie, 871 F Supp 100 [D Mass 1994]) that British courts have provided a useful analysis of the term habitual residence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Application of Ponath
green
1 sentence1995However, there is an emerging consensus in the majority of recently reported cases in the United States (see, Friedrich v Friedrich, 983 F2d 1396, supra; Levesque v Levesque, supra, at 665; Matter of Ponath, 829 F Supp 363 [D Utah 1993]; Slagenweit v Slagenweit, 841 F Supp 264 [ND Iowa 1993], appeal dismissed 43 F3d 1476 [8th Cir 1994]; Falls v Downie, 871 F Supp 100 [D Mass 1994]) that British courts have provided a useful analysis of the term habitual residence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Falls v. Downie
green
1 sentence1995However, there is an emerging consensus in the majority of recently reported cases in the United States (see, Friedrich v Friedrich, 983 F2d 1396, supra; Levesque v Levesque, supra, at 665; Matter of Ponath, 829 F Supp 363 [D Utah 1993]; Slagenweit v Slagenweit, 841 F Supp 264 [ND Iowa 1993], appeal dismissed 43 F3d 1476 [8th Cir 1994]; Falls v Downie, 871 F Supp 100 [D Mass 1994]) that British courts have provided a useful analysis of the term habitual residence. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Trepanier
green
1 sentence1989Thus, in People v Trepanier ( 84 AD2d 374, 377 ), People v Vastano ( 117 AD2d 637 ) and Steiner v Commissioner of Correction ( 490 F Supp 204 ), three attempted insurance fraud cases on which the People have placed heavy reliance, the defendants were held to have committed the crime of attempt even though no false claim had been filed because they had done everything within their power toward the accomplishment of their goal by placing the means to complete this final step in the hands of their confederates. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Thompson
neutral
1 sentence1989Thus, in People v Trepanier ( 84 AD2d 374, 377 ), People v Vastano ( 117 AD2d 637 ) and Steiner v Commissioner of Correction ( 490 F Supp 204 ), three attempted insurance fraud cases on which the People have placed heavy reliance, the defendants were held to have committed the crime of attempt even though no false claim had been filed because they had done everything within their power toward the accomplishment of their goal by placing the means to complete this final step in the hands of their confederates. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Steiner v. Commissioner of Correction
green
1 sentence1989Thus, in People v Trepanier ( 84 AD2d 374, 377 ), People v Vastano ( 117 AD2d 637 ) and Steiner v Commissioner of Correction ( 490 F Supp 204 ), three attempted insurance fraud cases on which the People have placed heavy reliance, the defendants were held to have committed the crime of attempt even though no false claim had been filed because they had done everything within their power toward the accomplishment of their goal by placing the means to complete this final step in the hands of their confederates. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley
green
1 sentence1966A useful test in cases of this kind may be found in Two Guys v. McGinley ( 366 U. S. 582 ) which dealt with Sunday closing laws. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Allen B. Dumont Laboratories, Inc. v. Carroll
green
2 sentences1951Indeed, Congress itself has found in the word "profane" a useful standard for both administrative and criminal sanctions against those uttering profane language or meaning by means of radio ( Dumont Laboratories v. Carroll , 184 F.2d 153, 156 , certiorari denied 340 U. S. 929 ; U. S. Code, tit. 47, § 303, subd. [m], par. [1], cl. [D]; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 1464; see, also, Penal Law, § 2072). 1951Indeed, Congress itself has found in the word “ profane ” a useful standard for both administrative and criminal sanctions against those uttering profane language or meaning by means of radio (Dumont Laboratories v. Carroll, 184 F. 2d 153, 156 , certiorari denied 340 U. S. 929 ; U. S. Code, tit. 47, § 303, subd. [m], par. [1], cl. [D]; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 1464; see, also, Penal Law, § 2072). | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Woodward v. United States
green
2 sentences1951Indeed, Congress itself has found in the word "profane" a useful standard for both administrative and criminal sanctions against those uttering profane language or meaning by means of radio ( Dumont Laboratories v. Carroll , 184 F.2d 153, 156 , certiorari denied 340 U. S. 929 ; U. S. Code, tit. 47, § 303, subd. [m], par. [1], cl. [D]; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 1464; see, also, Penal Law, § 2072). 1951Indeed, Congress itself has found in the word “ profane ” a useful standard for both administrative and criminal sanctions against those uttering profane language or meaning by means of radio (Dumont Laboratories v. Carroll, 184 F. 2d 153, 156 , certiorari denied 340 U. S. 929 ; U. S. Code, tit. 47, § 303, subd. [m], par. [1], cl. [D]; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 1464; see, also, Penal Law, § 2072). | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Rose v. . Balfe
green
1 sentence1925The case is not one of a disobedient servant doing an unnecessary thing as in Rose v. Balfe (supra), where to impose liability it was sought to cover an apparent joy ride with the shadow of authority, nor as in Boettcher v. Best & Co., Inc. (supra), the car is moved by a helper, not a driver, expressly forbidden to drive. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Boettcher v. Best & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1925The case is not one of a disobedient servant doing an unnecessary thing as in Rose v. Balfe (supra), where to impose liability it was sought to cover an apparent joy ride with the shadow of authority, nor as in Boettcher v. Best & Co., Inc. (supra), the car is moved by a helper, not a driver, expressly forbidden to drive. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.