9 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Speargreen2 sentences1990See, e.g., Matter of Spear, 160 Ariz. 545, 555 , 774 P.2d 1335, 1345 (1989) (standards provide a useful framework for guiding our sanction decision). 1990See, e.g., Matter of Spear, 160 Ariz. 545, 555 , 774 P.2d 1335, 1345 (1989) (standards provide a useful framework for guiding our sanction decision). | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Wardgreen2 sentences1997These considerations provide a useful framework, although they are “certainly neither exhaustive nor dispositive.” Ward, 448 U.S. at 249 , 100 S.Ct. at 2641 . 1997These considerations provide a useful framework, although they are “certainly neither exhaustive nor dispositive.” Ward, 448 U.S. at 249 , 100 S.Ct. at 2641 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017Although the trial court gave her the opportunity, Spring made no showing that Bradford’s expert witnesses changed their testimony based on their review of Spring’s expert witnesses’ trial testimony. ¶26 More apropos to our analysis and to providing a useful framework for considering claims of prejudice is American Power Products, Inc. In considering Arizona Rule of Evidence 606 and a bailiff’s improper communication with deliberating jurors, we stated that “our rules charge the trial judge with deciding, based on the available evidence, whether the error likely ‘affect[ed] the substantial rig 2017Although the trial court gave her the opportunity, Spring made no showing that Bradford’s expert witnesses changed their testimony based on their review of Spring’s expert witnesses’ trial testimony. ¶26 More apropos to our analysis and to providing a useful framework for considering claims of prejudice is American Power Products, Inc. In considering Arizona Rule of Evidence 606 and a bailiff’s improper communication with deliberating jurors, we stated that “our rules charge the trial judge with deciding, based on the available evidence, whether the error likely ‘affect[ed] the substantial rig | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Duval Sierrita Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2004In Duval Sierrita, the court addressed whether two types of property qualified for the § 42-5159(B)(1) use tax exemption: (1) spare or replacement parts for items conceded to be machinery or equipment, 116 Ariz. at 203 , 568 P.2d at 1101 , and (2) water booster pumps and steel water pipes used in Duval Sierrita’s mining operations, id. at 202 , 568 P.2d at 1100 . 2004In Duval Sierrita, the court addressed whether two types of property qualified for the § 42-5159(B)(1) use tax exemption: (1) spare or replacement parts for items conceded to be machinery or equipment, 116 Ariz. at 203 , 568 P.2d at 1101 , and (2) water booster pumps and steel water pipes used in Duval Sierrita’s mining operations, id. at 202 , 568 P.2d at 1100 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Boyes v. Shell Oil Products Company
green
1 sentence2003Co., 199 F.3d 1260 , provides a more useful analysis of the preemption issue. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
United States v. Ursery
green
1 sentence1997Indeed, after Noble , the Supreme Court in Ursery seemed to return to the two-part “intent-effects test” set forth in United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, 465 U.S. 354 , 104 S.Ct. 1099 , 79 L.Ed.2d 361 (1984). 518 U.S. at-, 116 S.Ct. at 2147 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms
green
2 sentences1997Indeed, after Noble , the Supreme Court in Ursery seemed to return to the two-part “intent-effects test” set forth in United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, 465 U.S. 354 , 104 S.Ct. 1099 , 79 L.Ed.2d 361 (1984). 518 U.S. at-, 116 S.Ct. at 2147 . 1997Indeed, after Noble , the Supreme Court in Ursery seemed to return to the two-part “intent-effects test” set forth in United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms, 465 U.S. 354 , 104 S.Ct. 1099 , 79 L.Ed.2d 361 (1984). 518 U.S. at-, 116 S.Ct. at 2147 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.