Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Maryhew v. Yovagreen2 sentences2024Thus, “[i]n order for a judgment to be rendered against a defendant when he is not served with process, there must be a showing upon the record that the defendant has voluntarily submitted himself to the court’s jurisdiction or committed other acts which constitute a waiver of the jurisdictional defense.” Id. at 156-157 ; see also Schumacher v. Schumacher, 2011-Ohio-581 , ¶ 11 (9th Dist.). 2022Personal jurisdiction “may be acquired either by service of process upon the defendant, the voluntary appearance and submission of the defendant or his legal representative, or by certain acts of the defendant or his legal representative which constitute an involuntary submission to the jurisdiction of the court.” Id. {¶5} “In order for a judgment to be rendered against a defendant when he is not served with process, there must be a showing upon the record that the defendant has voluntarily submitted himself to the court’s jurisdiction or committed other acts which constitute a waiver of the j | 5 | 13 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Five Star Financial Corp.
neutral
1 sentence2011Corp., Hamilton App. No. C-100037, 2011-Ohio-2476 , 2011 WL 2112667 , ¶ 19, fn. 15, quoting McBride v. Coble Express (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 505, 510 , 636 N.E.2d 356 (“ ‘[A]ny objection to assumption of personal jurisdiction is waived by a party’s failure to assert a challenge at its first appearance in the case, and such defendant is considered to have consented to the court’s jurisdiction’ ”). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
McBride v. Coble Express, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Corp., Hamilton App. No. C-100037, 2011-Ohio-2476 , 2011 WL 2112667 , ¶ 19, fn. 15, quoting McBride v. Coble Express (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 505, 510 , 636 N.E.2d 356 (“ ‘[A]ny objection to assumption of personal jurisdiction is waived by a party’s failure to assert a challenge at its first appearance in the case, and such defendant is considered to have consented to the court’s jurisdiction’ ”). 2011Corp., Hamilton App. No. C-100037, 2011-Ohio-2476 , 2011 WL 2112667 , ¶ 19, fn. 15, quoting McBride v. Coble Express (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 505, 510 , 636 N.E.2d 356 (“ ‘[A]ny objection to assumption of personal jurisdiction is waived by a party’s failure to assert a challenge at its first appearance in the case, and such defendant is considered to have consented to the court’s jurisdiction’ ”). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State ex rel. Ragozine v. Shaker
green
1 sentence2009Ragozine v. Shaker, 96 Ohio St.3d 201 , 2002-Ohio-3992 , 772 N.E.2d 1192 , ¶ 20, quoting Maryhew v. Yova (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 154, 156-157 , 11 OBR 471, 464 N.E.2d 538 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State ex rel. Ragozine v. Shaker
green
1 sentence2009Ragozine v. Shaker, 96 Ohio St.3d 201 , 2002-Ohio-3992 , 772 N.E.2d 1192 , ¶ 20, quoting Maryhew v. Yova (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 154, 156-157 , 11 OBR 471, 464 N.E.2d 538 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Weiss v. Pascal, Unpublished Decision (10-30-2003)
neutral
1 sentence2008Maryhew , 11 Ohio St.3d at 156 ("In order for a judgment to be rendered against a defendant when he is not served with process, there must be a showing upon the record that the defendant has voluntarily submitted himself to the court's jurisdiction or committed other acts which constitute a waiver of the jurisdictional defense."); Weiss, Inc. v. Pascal , Cuyahoga App. No. 82565, 2003-Ohio-5824 , at ¶ 7 (holding that the defense of personal jurisdiction is waivable and need not be raised by the trial court sua sponte); In re Billingsley , Putnam App. Nos. 12-02-07 12-02-08, 2003-Ohio-344 , at ¶ | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Continental Bank v. Meyer
green
1 sentence2003See, e.g., McBride v. Coble Express, Inc. (1993), 92 Ohio App.2d 505 ; Continental Bd., N.A., v. Meyer (7th Cir. 1993), 10 F.3d 1293 ; Yeldell v. Tutt (8th Cir. 1990), 913 F.2d 533 . {¶ 14} In McBride , the defendant never objected to the jurisdictional authority of the Ohio courts until after the plaintiff's worker's compensation claim was adjudicated and the plaintiff was seeking additional allowance for total disability benefits of the same claim. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
cluster 547541
green
1 sentence2003See, e.g., McBride v. Coble Express, Inc. (1993), 92 Ohio App.2d 505 ; Continental Bd., N.A., v. Meyer (7th Cir. 1993), 10 F.3d 1293 ; Yeldell v. Tutt (8th Cir. 1990), 913 F.2d 533 . {¶ 14} In McBride , the defendant never objected to the jurisdictional authority of the Ohio courts until after the plaintiff's worker's compensation claim was adjudicated and the plaintiff was seeking additional allowance for total disability benefits of the same claim. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.