Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2021 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Leverettegreen2 sentences2021Commonwealth v. Leverette, 911 A.2d 998, 1004 (Pa.Super. 2006). 2020Commonwealth v. Leverette, 911 A.2d 998, 1004 (Pa.Super. 2006). | 6 | 6 |
Com. v. Starr, E.green2 sentences2021See id. at 764 . -6- J-A11006-21 We concluded that the issue involved “a legal question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in fashioning an overbroad condition that runs afoul of constitutional rights” and did “not present a legality-of-sentence issue involving the trial court’s imposition of a sentence that exceeds its statutory authority.” Id. at 765 . 2021See id. at 764 . -6- J-A11006-21 We concluded that the issue involved “a legal question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in fashioning an overbroad condition that runs afoul of constitutional rights” and did “not present a legality-of-sentence issue involving the trial court’s imposition of a sentence that exceeds its statutory authority.” Id. at 765 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Egan
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 299 n. 4, 663 A.2d at 792 n. 4. *392 In Commonwealth v. Egan, 451 Pa.Super. 219 , 679 A.2d 237 (1996), however, we held that we could review a challenge to a sentence on the ground that the trial court failed to state the reasons for imposing the sentence on the record, regardless of whether the appellant raised this claim in the lower court. 1996Id. at 299 n. 4, 663 A.2d at 792 n. 4. *392 In Commonwealth v. Egan, 451 Pa.Super. 219 , 679 A.2d 237 (1996), however, we held that we could review a challenge to a sentence on the ground that the trial court failed to state the reasons for imposing the sentence on the record, regardless of whether the appellant raised this claim in the lower court. | 3 | 1996–2015 |
Adams v. Schriro
green
1 sentence2021In Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426 , 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115 , 124 S.Ct. 1053 , 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), our Supreme Court determined that an ineffectiveness claim might be raised on - 21 - J-S20027-21 direct appeal if: (1) the appellant raised his claim(s) in a post-sentence motion; (2) an evidentiary hearing was held on the claim(s); and (3) a record devoted to the claim(s) has been developed. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Marian v. California
green
1 sentence2021In Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426 , 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115 , 124 S.Ct. 1053 , 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), our Supreme Court determined that an ineffectiveness claim might be raised on - 21 - J-S20027-21 direct appeal if: (1) the appellant raised his claim(s) in a post-sentence motion; (2) an evidentiary hearing was held on the claim(s); and (3) a record devoted to the claim(s) has been developed. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Harley v. McMaster
green
1 sentence2021In Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426 , 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115 , 124 S.Ct. 1053 , 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), our Supreme Court determined that an ineffectiveness claim might be raised on - 21 - J-S20027-21 direct appeal if: (1) the appellant raised his claim(s) in a post-sentence motion; (2) an evidentiary hearing was held on the claim(s); and (3) a record devoted to the claim(s) has been developed. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Commonwealth v. Bomar
green
2 sentences2021In Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426 , 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115 , 124 S.Ct. 1053 , 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), our Supreme Court determined that an ineffectiveness claim might be raised on - 21 - J-S20027-21 direct appeal if: (1) the appellant raised his claim(s) in a post-sentence motion; (2) an evidentiary hearing was held on the claim(s); and (3) a record devoted to the claim(s) has been developed. 2021In Commonwealth v. Bomar, 573 Pa. 426 , 826 A.2d 831 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1115 , 124 S.Ct. 1053 , 157 L.Ed.2d 906 (2004), our Supreme Court determined that an ineffectiveness claim might be raised on - 21 - J-S20027-21 direct appeal if: (1) the appellant raised his claim(s) in a post-sentence motion; (2) an evidentiary hearing was held on the claim(s); and (3) a record devoted to the claim(s) has been developed. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Commonwealth v. Holmes
green
2 sentences2021The Supreme Court limited its holding in Bomar in Commonwealth v. Holmes, 621 Pa. 595 , 79 A.3d 562 (2013). 2021The Supreme Court limited its holding in Bomar in Commonwealth v. Holmes, 621 Pa. 595 , 79 A.3d 562 (2013). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Commonwealth v. McKenna
green
2 sentences2018See: Com[monwealth] v. McKenna, 476 Pa. 428 , 383 A.2d 174 (1978)[.] Bronson’s Order states that the Appellant raised the claim that: “THE COURT IMPOSED A SENTENCE[] GREATER THAN THE LAWFUL MAXIMUM”, the Appellant’s claim is that his liberty has been restrained unlawfully and unconstitutionally. 2018See: Com[monwealth] v. McKenna, 476 Pa. 428 , 383 A.2d 174 (1978)[.] Bronson’s Order states that the Appellant raised the claim that: “THE COURT IMPOSED A SENTENCE[] GREATER THAN THE LAWFUL MAXIMUM”, the Appellant’s claim is that his liberty has been restrained unlawfully and unconstitutionally. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Chazin
green
1 sentence2016Chazin, supra at 735 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Com. v. DM
green
1 sentence1996Id. at 299 n. 4, 663 A.2d at 792 n. 4. *392 In Commonwealth v. Egan, 451 Pa.Super. 219 , 679 A.2d 237 (1996), however, we held that we could review a challenge to a sentence on the ground that the trial court failed to state the reasons for imposing the sentence on the record, regardless of whether the appellant raised this claim in the lower court. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Commonwealth v. Daniels
green
2 sentences1982In Commonwealth v. Daniels, 491 Pa. 289 , 420 A.2d 1323 (1980) our Supreme Court was faced with a somewhat identical factual situation, the only real difference being appellant’s intervening PCHA petitions; in Daniels the appellant raised his claim immediately after counsel refused to seek review in the Supreme Court. 1982In Commonwealth v. Daniels, 491 Pa. 289 , 420 A.2d 1323 (1980) our Supreme Court was faced with a somewhat identical factual situation, the only real difference being appellant’s intervening PCHA petitions; in Daniels the appellant raised his claim immediately after counsel refused to seek review in the Supreme Court. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.