14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Browngreen2 sentences2022Accordingly, “a defendant claiming error on appeal has the burden of demonstrating that he suffered actual, not speculative, prejudice because of the ruling permitting a joint trial.” Id. at 162 (citations omitted). - 11 - J-A18044-22 The PCRA court concluded Smith failed to establish his counsel was ineffective because he did not prove he was prejudiced, as he did not show the trial court would have granted a motion to sever: [T]he Court finds that there would have been little possibility the trial court would have granted such a motion had it been raised. 2017Further, “a defendant claiming error on appeal has the burden of demonstrating that he suffered actual, not speculative, prejudice because of the ruling permitting a joint trial.” Brown, 925 A.2d at 162 (citation omitted). | 6 | 7 |
Commonwealth v. Hawkinsgreen2 sentences2016A defendant claiming this exception must also show that “the information could not have been obtained earlier with the exercise of due diligence.” Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 953 A.2d 1248, 1253 (Pa. 2006) (citation omitted). 2015A defendant claiming this exception must also show that “the information could not have been obtained earlier with the exercise of due diligence.” Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 953 A.2d 1248, 1253 (Pa. 2006) (citation omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Housmangreen1 sentence2017Commonwealth v. Brown, 925 A.2d 147, 161-62 (Pa. 2007) (quotation marks, citations, and footnote omitted)17; see also 18 Pa.C.S. § 903(d).18 ____________________________________________ 17 See also Commonwealth v. Housman, 986 A.2d 822, 834 (Pa. 2009) (“[T]he fact the co-defendants blamed one another is insufficient to warrant separate trials based on antagonistic defenses. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Rivera
green
2 sentences2021Rivera, 773 A.2d at 137 . 2007Rivera, 773 A.2d at 137 . | 2 | 2007–2021 |
Duren v. Missouri
green
2 sentences1980In Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S.Ct. 664 , 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979), the defendant bore the burden of proving that a jury panel system that afforded women an automatic exemption from jury service violated his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. 1980In Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S.Ct. 664 , 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979), the defendant bore the burden of proving that a jury panel system that afforded women an automatic exemption from jury service violated his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.